Low Birth Weight Inequities in Context: Racial Segregation, Neighborhood Factors, and Preconception Care.

Black women experience disproportionately higher rates of low birth weight, preterm delivery, and infant mortality. At least some amount of this disparity results from differences in exposure to detrimental social factors. Segregation is one social force shaping the distribution of power and resources and, therefore, women’s exposure to negative social environments. Using data from California Vital Records and the US Census, paper 1 evaluates the relationship between racial isolation and low birth weight for black, Hispanic, and Asian/Pacific Islander women. Isolation from whites predicts higher risk of low birth weight for black women specifically through an increased risk of small for gestational age births. For Hispanic women, isolation from whites predicts and increase in low birth weight for US-born women, but not foreign-born women, suggesting that ethnic enclave effects may not persist in this group. Finally, for Asian/Pacific Islander women, isolation predicts lower risk of low birth weight as a result of decreased risk of appropriate for gestational age preterm birth. Social capital is one mechanism through which segregation may impact birth outcomes. In Paper 2, analyses using data from California Vital Records and LAFANS suggest that higher levels of perceived social reciprocity are associated with lower risk of low birth weight for foreign-born women, but not for US-born women. Reciprocity predicts higher rates of low birth weight for Hispanic women, indicating that social reciprocity may be a unique stressor for US-born Hispanic women. For black women, social capital measures did not predict low birth weight outcomes. Paper 3 explores the potential for preconception care – a proposed public health intervention – to alleviate racial inequities in pregnancy outcomes. Preconception care may have positive impacts on individual women’s health. However, preconception care utilizes a clinical, individualistic, non-specific approach that does not address either the clinical or social drivers of racial inequities in birth outcomes, and should be reconsidered as a strategy for reducing these gaps. Taken together, these analyses provide insight into inequities in birth outcomes for women of color living in segregated neighborhoods, and evaluate policies aimed at mitigating this disparity.PHDHealth Services Organization & PolicyUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studieshttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/97930/1/mdebbink_1.pd

Maternal Morbidity and Medically Assisted Reproduction Treatment Types

OBJECTIVE: To compare odds of maternal morbidity by mode of becoming pregnant and type of medically assisted reproduction treatments: fertility-enhancing drugs, intrauterine insemination (IUI), and assisted reproductive technology (ART) with autologous or donor oocytes. METHODS: Birth certificates were used to study maternal morbidity among the birthing population in Utah between 2009 and 2017 (N=469,919 deliveries); 22,543 pregnancies occurred through medically assisted reproduction (4.8%). Maternal morbidity was identified as a binary variable, indicating the presence of any of the following: blood transfusion, unplanned operating room procedure, admission to intensive care unit, eclampsia, unplanned hysterectomy, and ruptured uterus. Using logistic regression, we assessed maternal morbidity among medically assisted reproduction pregnancies (overall and by type of treatment) compared with unassisted pregnancies in the overall sample before and after adjustment for individual sociodemographics (age at birth, family structure, level of education, Hispanic origin, parity), and pre-existing comorbidities (ie, chronic hypertension, heart disease, asthma), multifetal gestation, and obstetric comorbidities (ie, placenta previa, placental abruption, cesarean delivery). RESULTS: Individuals becoming pregnant through medically assisted reproduction had higher risk of maternal morbidity, with odds ratios (ORs) increasing as medically assisted reproduction treatments become more invasive. Associations were largely attenuated when accounting for multifetal gestation and further reduced after controlling for obstetric comorbidities. However, ART with autologous oocytes (OR 1.46, 95% CI, 1.20–1.78) maintained higher coefficients compared with unassisted pregnancies. In models including only singletons, after controlling for obstetric comorbidities, the OR differences in maternal morbidity between all medically assisted reproduction groups and unassisted pregnancies were no longer statistically significant. CONCLUSION: More invasive medically assisted reproduction treatments (ART and IUI) are associated with higher odds of maternal morbidity, whereas less invasive treatments are not. This relationship is partially explained by higher prevalence of multifetal gestation and obstetric comorbidities in people undergoing more invasive treatment, but the persistent association suggests subfertility itself may contribute to maternal morbidity

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Adverse Perinatal Outcomes at Term

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate whether racial and ethnic disparities in adverse perinatal outcomes exist at term. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a secondary analysis of a multicenter observational study of 115,502 pregnant patients and their neonates (2008-2011). Singleton, nonanomalous pregnancies delivered from 37 to 41 weeks were included. Race and ethnicity were abstracted from the medical record and categorized as non-Hispanic White (White; referent), non-Hispanic Black (Black), non-Hispanic Asian (Asian), or Hispanic. The primary outcome was an adverse perinatal composite defined as perinatal death, Apgar score < 4 at 5 minutes, ventilator support, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, subgaleal hemorrhage, skeletal fracture, infant stay greater than maternal stay (by ≥ 3 days), brachial plexus palsy, or facial nerve palsy. RESULTS: Of the 72,117 patients included, 48% were White, 20% Black, 5% Asian, and 26% Hispanic. The unadjusted risk of the primary outcome was highest for neonates of Black patients (3.1%, unadjusted relative risk [uRR] = 1.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-1.30), lowest for neonates of Hispanic patients (2.1%, uRR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.71-0.89), and no different for neonates of Asian (2.6%), compared with those of White patients (2.7%). In the adjusted model including age, body mass index (BMI), smoking, obstetric history, and high-risk pregnancy, differences in risk for the primary outcome were no longer observed for neonates of Black (adjusted relative risk [aRR] = 1.06, 95% CI: 0.94-1.19) and Hispanic (aRR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.81-1.04) patients. Adding insurance to the model lowered the risk for both groups (aRR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.75-0.96 for Black; aRR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.59-0.78 for Hispanic). CONCLUSION: Although neonates of Black patients have the highest frequency of adverse perinatal outcomes at term, after adjustment for sociodemographic factors, this higher risk is no longer observed, suggesting the importance of developing strategies that address social determinants of health to lessen extant health disparities. KEY POINTS: Term neonates of Black patients have the highest crude frequency of adverse perinatal outcomes. After adjustment for confounders, higher risk for neonates of Black patients is no longer observed. Disparities in outcomes are strongly related to insurance status

Racial and Ethnic Inequities in Cesarean Birth and Maternal Morbidity in a Low-Risk, Nulliparous Cohort

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate race and ethnicity differences in cesarean birth and maternal morbidity in low-risk nulliparous people at term. METHODS: We conducted a secondary analysis of a randomized trial of expectant management compared with induction of labor in low-risk nulliparous people at term. The primary outcome was cesarean birth. Secondary outcome was maternal morbidity, defined as: transfusion of 4 or more units of red blood cells, any transfusion of other products, postpartum infection, intensive care unit admission, hysterectomy, venous thromboembolism, or maternal death. Multivariable modified Poisson regression was used to evaluate associations between race and ethnicity, cesarean birth, and maternal morbidity. Indication for cesarean birth was assessed using multivariable multinomial logistic regression. A mediation model was used to estimate the portion of maternal morbidity attributable to cesarean birth by race and ethnicity. RESULTS: Of 5,759 included participants, 1,158 (20.1%) underwent cesarean birth; 1,404 (24.3%) identified as non-Hispanic Black, 1,670 (29.0%) as Hispanic, and 2,685 (46.6%) as non-Hispanic White. Adjusted models showed increased relative risk of cesarean birth among non-Hispanic Black (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.21, 95% CI 1.03-1.42) and Hispanic (aRR 1.26, 95% CI 1.08-1.46) people compared with non-Hispanic White people. Maternal morbidity affected 132 (2.3%) individuals, and was increased among non-Hispanic Black (aRR 2.05, 95% CI 1.21-3.47) and Hispanic (aRR 1.92, 95% CI 1.17-3.14) people compared with non-Hispanic White people. Cesarean birth accounted for an estimated 15.8% (95% CI 2.1-48.7%) and 16.5% (95% CI 4.0-44.0%) of excess maternal morbidity among non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic people, respectively. CONCLUSION: Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic nulliparous people who are low-risk at term undergo cesarean birth more frequently than low-risk non-Hispanic White nulliparous people. This difference accounts for a modest portion of excess maternal morbidity

Virology under the microscope—a call for rational discourse

Viruses have brought humanity many challenges: respiratory infection, cancer, neurological impairment and immunosuppression to name a few. Virology research over the last 60+ years has responded to reduce this disease burden with vaccines and antivirals. Despite this long history, the COVID-19 pandemic has brought unprecedented attention to the field of virology. Some of this attention is focused on concern about the safe conduct of research with human pathogens. A small but vocal group of individuals has seized upon these concerns – conflating legitimate questions about safely conducting virus-related research with uncertainties over the origins of SARS-CoV-2. The result has fueled public confusion and, in many instances, ill-informed condemnation of virology. With this article, we seek to promote a return to rational discourse. We explain the use of gain-of-function approaches in science, discuss the possible origins of SARS-CoV-2 and outline current regulatory structures that provide oversight for virological research in the United States. By offering our expertise, we – a broad group of working virologists – seek to aid policy makers in navigating these controversial issues. Balanced, evidence-based discourse is essential to addressing public concern while maintaining and expanding much-needed research in virology

Racial Residential Segregation and Low Birth Weight in Michigan's Metropolitan Areas

Objectives. We examined the influence of racial residential segregation, independent of neighborhood economic factors, on the overall and specific etiological risks of low birth weight. Methods. We geocoded all singleton births in Michigan metropolitan areas during 2000 to census tracts. We used hierarchical generalized linear models to investigate the association between low birth weight (&lt; 2500 g) and neighborhood-level economic and racial segregation, controlling for individual and neighborhood characteristics. We analyzed competing risks of the 2 etiologies of low birth weight: intrauterine growth restriction and preterm birth. Results. Living in a Black segregated area was associated with increased odds (odds ratio [OR] = 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03, 1.29; P &lt; .05) of low birth weight after adjusting for individual- and tract-level measures. The analysis suggested that the association between low birth weight and racial segregation was attributable primarily to increased risk of intrauterine growth restriction (OR = 1.19; 95% CI = 1.03, 1.37; P &lt; .05). Conclusions. Odds of low birth weight are higher in racially segregated Black neighborhoods in Michigan's metropolitan areas, independent of economic factors. The association appears to operate through intrauterine growth restriction rather than preterm birth. </jats:p

Association of multifetal gestation with obstetric and neonatal outcomes in gestational carrier pregnancies.

OBJECTIVE: Multifetal gestation is more frequent among gestational carrier pregnancies than non-surrogacy IVF pregnancies. We aimed to evaluate the association between multifetal gestation and obstetric and neonatal morbidity among gestational carrier pregnancies. METHODS: Pooled cross-sectional study of birth certificate data from gestational carrier pregnancies in Utah from 2009 to 2018. Our primary outcome was a composite of severe obstetric morbidity; secondary outcomes included cesarean delivery (CD), hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, preterm birth (PTB), and a neonatal morbidity composite. Logistic regression was utilized to compare odds of these outcomes between gestational carrier pregnancies with and without multifetal gestation. RESULTS: A total of 361 gestational carrier pregnancies resulted in the delivery of 435 neonates during the study period. Of these, 284 were singleton pregnancies, and 77 were multifetal, a multifetal gestation rate of 21.3%. Baseline demographic characteristics did not differ between singleton and multifetal gestations. Multifetal gestation was not associated with higher rates of severe obstetric morbidity (odds ratio [OR] 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34-10.39). Multifetal gestation was associated with increased odds of neonatal morbidity (OR 9.49, 95% CI 5.35-15.83); PTB &lt; 37, 34, and 32&nbsp;weeks (OR 21.88, 95% CI 11.64-41.12; OR 11.67, 95% CI 5.25-25.91; OR 8.79, 95% CI 3.41-22.68); and CD (OR 4.82, 95% CI 2.81-8.27). CONCLUSION: Severe obstetric morbidity did not differ between singleton and multifetal gestations among gestational carrier pregnancies. However, multifetal gestation was associated with increased odds of neonatal morbidity, CD, and PTB. This information may be useful when counseling prospective gestational carriers and intended parents