Hippocampal state-dependent behavioral reflex to an identical sensory input in rats.

We examined the local field potential of the hippocampus to monitor brain states during a conditional discrimination task, in order to elucidate the relationship between ongoing brain states and a conditioned motor reflex. Five 10-week-old Wistar/ST male rats underwent a serial feature positive conditional discrimination task in eyeblink conditioning using a preceding light stimulus as a conditional cue for reinforced trials. In this task, a 2-s light stimulus signaled that the following 350-ms tone (conditioned stimulus) was reinforced with a co-terminating 100-ms periorbital electrical shock. The interval between the end of conditional cue and the onset of the conditioned stimulus was 4±1 s. The conditioned stimulus was not reinforced when the light was not presented. Animals successfully utilized the light stimulus as a conditional cue to drive differential responses to the identical conditioned stimulus. We found that presentation of the conditional cue elicited hippocampal theta oscillations, which persisted during the interval of conditional cue and the conditioned stimulus. Moreover, expression of the conditioned response to the tone (conditioned stimulus) was correlated with the appearance of theta oscillations immediately before the conditioned stimulus. These data support hippocampal involvement in the network underlying a conditional discrimination task in eyeblink conditioning. They also suggest that the preceding hippocampal activity can determine information processing of the tone stimulus in the cerebellum and its associated circuits

Rat hippocampal LFP, eyelid EMG, and stimulus timstamps (PLOS ONE Data)

<p>The original raw data of the experiment in the Plos One paper;</p> <p>Keita Tokuda, Michimasa Nishikawa, Shigenori Kawahara, "Hippocampal state-dependent behavioral reflex to an identical sensory input in rats," <em>PLOS ONE</em>, (accepted).</p> <p>The data contains folders corresponding each rat:t1, t2, t3, t5, t6.<br>Each of those folders contains folders corresponding 12 sessions.<br>Each folder contains the files in Neuralynx file format, as below;<br>----------------------------</p> <p>EMG.Ncs<br>Events.Nev<br>LogFile.txt<br>hippo.Ncs</p> <p>----------------------------</p> <p>The file "hippo.ncs" contains all the data from hippocampus acquired during the experimet. The file "EMG.ncs" contains all the data of eyelid electromyography acquired during the experiment.<br>One can refer to the Event.Nev file to know the time points of the task stimuli.<br>One can either visualize and convert the neuralynx files by downloading softwares from Neuralynx web cite.<br>http://neuralynx.com/research_software/file_converters_and_utilities/</p

Dependency of the CR expression on the state of hippocampal LFP before the CS onset.

<p>(A) LFP signals and EMG amplitude signals for two successive paired trials (trial 24 and trial 25 in session 10). The theta rhythm is absent and no CR response is observed in the former trial. A prominent theta rhythm and successive CR response are observed in the latter trial. (B) Averaged dynamic power spectra around the CS presentation calculated separately according to the trial type and presence of CR. Theta band activity is evident before the presentation of CS in the trials with CR expression. Shown are the data from the session 10 of a rat. x axis, time (in s); y axis, frequency (in Hz). The color scale represents the signal power (in log₁₀V²). The width of the moving time window is 2 s long. The lower traces corresponds the relative theta power calculated from the average dynamics spectra shown above. (C) The average relative theta power across the last 5 sessions (sessions 6–10). All the valid trials in those sessions for each rat were separated according to the trial type and presence of the CR to the CS for the calculation of the relative theta power. Then, the average relative theta power across all the rats was compared. Significant difference were observed between CR trials and no-CR trials (paired <i>t</i>-test, **<i>P</i><0.001; *<i>P</i><0.005). Vertical bars indicate the standard deviations.</p

Elicitation of the hippocampal theta by the stimuli.

<p>(A) (B) The dynamic power spectra showing the elicitation of theta oscillation by the stimuli. Note that the main reason for the predominance of the theta rhythm is the decreased power of frequency ranges other than theta, while the absolute power of the theta range remained constant. (A) A representative LFP signal around a presentation of the light cue. The theta oscillation is elicited by the presentation of the cue. The middle panel shows the dynamic power spectra for the same trial using a 2-s moving window. The lowermost panel trace shows the relative power of the theta frequency range calculated for each time point using the moving window centered at that time. (B) Dynamic power spectra around the stimuli and the relative theta power. Theta band activity is evident after presentation of both the conditional light cue and CS. Shown are the averages across all the trials for each stimulus type in the session 10 of a rat (50 trials each). x axis, time (in s); y axis, frequency (in Hz). The color scale represents the signal power (in log₁₀V²). The width of the moving time window is 2 s long. The relative theta power was calculated with the average dynamic power spectra showed above the trace with 2-s time window. (C) The relative theta power (5–8 Hz) calculated for each 3-s prestimulus and poststimulus interval. The average relative theta power over all valid trials from the same day across 5 rats. Vertical bars indicate the standard error of the mean. (D) Same data from the first acquisition session calculated for successive blocks of 5 trials. The data for post paired CS period are excluded. Vertical bars indicate the standard error of the mean.</p

Acquisition of discriminative CRs.

<p>(A) The upper figure illustrates the averaged learning curves for 5 rats calculated for each type of trials. Vertical bars indicate the standard error of the mean. The lower figure shows the learning curves illustrated by the average normalized CR amplitude across all rats calculated separately for each type of trials and session. Vertical bars indicate the standard error of the mean. (B) Averaged normalized EMG amplitudes for paired trials and CS-alone trials of a rat for different sessions. sp, spontaneous session.</p

Electrode position in hippocampus.

<p>(A) The picture of a brain section taken from one of the animals. The arrows show the tips of a pair of the electrodes. (B) The upper trace shows the raw EMG signal around the CS of a paired trial. The lower trace shows the EMG amplitude signal calculated using the method described in the text. (C) Representative raw hippocampal LFP signals recorded by a pair of electrodes in a same session showing theta oscillation and large irregular amplitude activity (LIA). The upper trace shows representative theta oscillation and the lower trace shows a representative LIA.</p

The sequence of the stimuli in the conditional discrimination task.

<p>Two kinds of trials were used in the task: paired trials, and CS-alone trials. In a paired trial, a chamber light stimulus is delivered before the CS. The duration of the interval between the end of the light stimulus and the CS onset is 3 s to 5 s, averaging 4 s. In a CS-alone trial, the CS alone is delivered without reinforcement.</p

Correlation between CR amplitude and theta power.

<p>(A) Scattergrams showing the relationship between CR amplitude and relative theta power. Each point indicates each trial. Open circles correspond to paired trials and filled circles correspond to CS-alone trials. Shown are data from one rat (rat t6). x axis, relative theta power of 3-s prestimulus interval calculated for each trial; y axis, normalized CR amplitude. (B) Histogram of CR amplitude for session 10 from the same rat. Sharp peak around the value 1 corresponds to the trials without any response to the CS showing spontaneous level of EMG. The distribution shows a clear bimodal clustering tendency. (C) Histogram of relative theta power of prestimulus intervals for session 10. The trials were divided according to whether the EMG amplitude is bigger or smaller than 2. (D) The upper panel shows the plots of average correlation coefficients between CR amplitude and relative theta power for the 5 rats, and average correlation ratio between trial type (paired trial or CS-alone trial) and relative theta power for prestimulus interval for the 5 rats. The lower panel shows the plot of average CR percentage difference between paired trial and CS-alone trial for 5 rats. Each value was calculated for each session, and then the average and standard error were calculated across 5 rats.</p