Prostate cancer metastasis mimicking appendicitis—A rare but important differential diagnosis in PET/CT imaging

Prostate cancer most commonly metastasizes to lymph nodes, bones, the liver, and the lungs. Prostate cancer carcinomatosis with an affinity for the appendix is not well described in current literature and is usually reported with acute appendicitis as the primary presentation. A 65-year-old male with a history of recurrent prostate cancer presented with an increase in PSA value. 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT showed nodular tissue growth and increased PSMA uptake in the prostate, on the appendix, in the umbilicus, and in several intra- and extra pelvic lymph nodes. The patient had no symptomatic complaints at time of referral. Imaging findings of the appendix resembling characteristic findings of acute appendicitis raised doubts about the interpretation of these as inflammatory disease or peritoneal carcinomatosis secondary to prostate cancer. This case demonstrates the importance of correct differentiation between the 2 conditions based on imaging, clinical symptomatology, and patient history to provide proper care in time.</p

Indications for nuclear medicine imaging in prostate cancer

Nuclear medicine imaging for prostate cancer has advanced significantly over the past decade. A survey is presented in this review. PSMA-PET/CT is a new highly accurate method that has been introduced, but bone scans and bone-PET continue to be widely applied. PSMA-PET/CT still lacks sufficient patient outcome data to be recommended for treatment allocation when used for primary staging. However, the literature and clinical guidelines support its use at the stage of biochemical recurrence. In Denmark, the use of nuclear medicine examinations for prostate cancer aligns with clinical guideline recommendations.</p

A randomised trial of [18F]PSMA‐1007‐PET/CT versus NaF‐PET/CT for staging primary prostate cancer: A trial protocol

Prostate‐specific membrane antigen (PSMA)‐positron emission tomography/contrast‐enhanced computed tomography (PET/CT) is a sensitive imaging modality for prostate cancer (PCa). Due to lack of knowledge of the patient benefit, PSMA‐PET/CT is not yet recommended in the European guidelines for staging and treatment planning of patients with newly diagnosed PCa. We will investigate the potential difference in progression‐free survival (PFS) and quality of life (QoL) of using PSMA‐PET/CT versus sodium fluoride (NaF)‐PET/CT for staging and treatment planning in patients with newly diagnosed PCa. This is a prospective randomised controlled multicentre trial carried out at three centres in the Region of Southern Denmark. The primary endpoint is PFS. Secondary endpoints are residual disease, stage migration, impact on treatment strategies, stage distribution, QoL and diagnostic accuracy measures. Patients eligible for the study have newly diagnosed unfavourable intermediate‐ or high‐risk PCa. A total of 448 patients will be randomised 1:1 into two groups: (A) a control group staged with Na[18F]F‐PET/CT and (B) an intervention group staged with [18F]PSMA‐1007‐PET/CT. A subgroup in the intervention group will have a supplementary blinded Na[18F]F‐PET/CT performed for the purpose of performing accuracy analyses. QoL will be assessed at baseline and with regular intervals (3–12 months) during the study period. Treatment decisions are achieved at multidisciplinary team conferences based on the results of the respective scans and according to current Danish guidelines. The Regional Committees on Health Research Ethics for Southern Denmark (S‐20190161) and the Danish Medicines Agency (EudraCT Number 2021‐000123‐12) approved the study, and it has been registered on clinicaltrials.gov (Record 2020110469).Background: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positron emission tomography/contrast-enhanced computed tomography (PET/CT) is a sensitive imaging modality for prostate cancer (PCa). Due to lack of knowledge of the patient benefit, PSMA-PET/CT is not yet recommended in the European guidelines for staging and treatment planning of patients with newly diagnosed PCa. We will investigate the potential difference in progression-free survival (PFS) and quality of life (QoL) of using PSMA-PET/CT versus sodium fluoride (NaF)-PET/CT for staging and treatment planning in patients with newly diagnosed PCa. Study Design: This is a prospective randomised controlled multicentre trial carried out at three centres in the Region of Southern Denmark. Endpoints: The primary endpoint is PFS. Secondary endpoints are residual disease, stage migration, impact on treatment strategies, stage distribution, QoL and diagnostic accuracy measures. Patients and Methods: Patients eligible for the study have newly diagnosed unfavourable intermediate- or high-risk PCa. A total of 448 patients will be randomised 1:1 into two groups: (A) a control group staged with Na[ 18F]F-PET/CT and (B) an intervention group staged with [ 18F]PSMA-1007-PET/CT. A subgroup in the intervention group will have a supplementary blinded Na[ 18F]F-PET/CT performed for the purpose of performing accuracy analyses. QoL will be assessed at baseline and with regular intervals (3–12 months) during the study period. Treatment decisions are achieved at multidisciplinary team conferences based on the results of the respective scans and according to current Danish guidelines. Trial Registration: The Regional Committees on Health Research Ethics for Southern Denmark (S-20190161) and the Danish Medicines Agency (EudraCT Number 2021-000123-12) approved the study, and it has been registered on clinicaltrials.gov (Record 2020110469).</p

Complexity of Drug Substitutions Caused by Drug Tenders: A Mixed-Methods Study in Denmark

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate factors influencing the complexity of drug substitutions caused by drug tenders in a Danish hospital setting. Methods: A sequential explanatory mixed-methods approach was employed. In the first phase, a custom-made, self-administered questionnaire was distributed to 58 pharmacists and pharmaconomists employed at the Hospital Pharmacy in the North Denmark Region. The questionnaire consisted of 13 questions, which helped to obtain quantitative information on factors complicating drug substitutions. The results were used to inform the construction of an interview guide for a focus group interview held in the following qualitative second phase of the study. The focus group included 11 pharmacists and pharmaconomists from the Hospital Pharmacy in the North Denmark Region working with drug substitutions. The focus group interview was conducted to facilitate validation of results from the questionnaire survey and to add further perspectives on identified factors influencing the complexity of drug substitutions. Results: Findings from both phases of the study revealed that implementation of drug substitutions is more complex when drug strength or pharmaceutical form of a drug changes, compared with changes of drug trade name or package size. Furthermore, it was established that Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification codes could be used to identify drug substitutions that are typically complex, for example, L01 and N05. Several external factors were also found to influence implementation of drug substitutions, for example, related to drug usage, number of end users, and hospital wards. Conclusions: From a hospital pharmacy point of view, multiple factors were identified that could influence and complicate the implementation of drug substitutions with different impact size. Those factors included both changed characteristics of drugs, Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification codes involved in substitution, and external factors. </jats:p

Complexity of drug substitutions caused by drug tenders: A mixed-methods study in Denmark

Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate factors influencing the complexity of drug substitutions caused by drug tenders in a Danish hospital setting. Methods: A sequential explanatory mixed-methods approach was employed. In the first phase, a custom-made, self-administered questionnaire was distributed to 58 pharmacists and pharmaconomists employed at the Hospital Pharmacy in the North Denmark Region. The questionnaire consisted of 13 questions, which helped to obtain quantitative information on factors complicating drug substitutions. The results were used to inform the construction of an interview guide for a focus group interview held in the following qualitative second phase of the study. The focus group included 11 pharmacists and pharmaconomists from the Hospital Pharmacy in the North Denmark Region working with drug substitutions. The focus group interview was conducted to facilitate validation of results from the questionnaire survey and to add further perspectives on identified factors influencing the complexity of drug substitutions. Results: Findings from both phases of the study revealed that implementation of drug substitutions is more complex when drug strength or pharmaceutical form of a drug changes, compared with changes of drug trade name or package size. Furthermore, it was established that Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification codes could be used to identify drug substitutions that are typically complex, for example, L01 and N05. Several external factors were also found to influence implementation of drug substitutions, for example, related to drug usage, number of end users, and hospital wards. Conclusions: From a hospital pharmacy point of view, multiple factors were identified that could influence and complicate the implementation of drug substitutions with different impact size. Those factors included both changed characteristics of drugs, Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification codes involved in substitution, and external factors