The discrepancy between patient expectations and actual outcome reduces at the first 6 months following total knee replacement surgery

Purpose: Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty often have unfulfilled expectations from the surgery that can lead to dissatisfaction. This study aimed to examine the discrepancy between patients’ expectations and actual functional abilities prior to undergoing knee replacement surgery, and at 6 and 12 months following the surgery. Methods: A survey was undertaken of patients before, and 6 and 12 months post-surgery. The survey included the Knee Surgery Perception Questionnaire (KSPQ) to assess patients’ current perception of their level of function and pain, their desired outcomes, and the discrepancy between the two. Pain, function and quality of life were also assessed. Repeated measure ANOVAs were used to assess differences between pre- and post-surgery. Results: A total of 176 patients were surveyed. Significant differences in the KSPQ discrepancy scores (subscale and total scores) were demonstrated between the three assessment point times (p < 0.01). Paired t tests identified significant differences between the pre-surgery and 6-month KSPQ discrepancy scores, (p < 0.01) indicative of substantial improvement in physical function and slight reduction in expectations. Overall significant improvement (p < 0.01) was reported over time across all measures: physical function, pain and stiffness and quality of life. Conclusion: The discrepancy between patients’ current abilities and their expectation changes following surgery, especially in the first 6 months post-surgery. Patients’ goals might change as their function and pain improve post-surgery. Combining education programmes and discussion with the treating orthopaedic surgeons pre-operatively is important for the development of realistic, achievable expectations. Level of evidence: III

How do orthopaedic surgeons inform their patients before knee arthroplasty surgery? A cross-sectional study

Abstract Background Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a successful and common procedure. However, 6–28% of patients are dissatisfied postoperatively. The provision of preoperative patient information, inquiring about patients’ expectations, and taking a psychiatric history are essential parts of both preoperative evaluation and postoperative outcome. The aim of this study was to investigate how orthopaedic knee surgeons in Sweden inform their patients before surgery. Methods A questionnaire was distributed to all knee surgeons performing TKA in Sweden. Responses were received from 60 of the 65 orthopaedic departments performing TKA in Sweden (92%), covering 219 of the approximately 311 knee surgeons at the 65 departments (70%). The answers were analysed with descriptive statistics. A content analysis of the surgeons’ opinions was also performed using a thematic method. Results In terms of information provision, 58% of the surgeons always gave written information while 92% informed orally. Only 44% always asked about the patient’s expectations, and only 42% always informed patients about the 20% dissatisfaction rate after TKA. Additionally, 24% never operated on mild indication of arthrosis, 20% always took a psychiatric history, and half never or seldom consulted a psychiatrist. However, all the knee surgeons believed in a psychiatric impact on TKA outcome. Qualitative analysis revealed five common causes of patient dissatisfaction, which in descending frequency were: patients’ expectations, choice of patients to operate on, surgical factors, combinations of factors, and insufficient information provision to patients. Conclusions Knee surgeons in Sweden have considerable awareness of the importance of preoperative patient information, the impact of patient expectations, and psychiatric illness. However, they need to improve their preoperative routines when it comes to providing written information, asking about the patient’s expectations, and psychiatric assessment