50 research outputs found
Predictors of Antibiotics Co-prescription with Antimalarials for Patients Presenting with Fever in Rural Tanzania.
Successful implementation of malaria treatment policy depends on the prescription practices for patients with malaria. This paper describes prescription patterns and assesses factors associated with co-prescription of antibiotics and artemether-lumefantrine (AL) for patients presenting with fever in rural Tanzania. From June 2009 to September 2011, a cohort event monitoring program was conducted among all patients treated at 8 selected health facilities in Ifakara and Rufiji Health and Demographic Surveillance System (HDSS).It included all patients presenting with fever and prescribed with AL. Logistic regression was used to model the predictors on the outcome variable which is co-prescription of AL and antibiotics on a single clinical visit. A cohort of 11,648 was recruited and followed up with 92% presenting with fever. Presumptive treatment was used in 56% of patients treated with AL. On average 2.4 (1 -- 7) drugs was prescribed per encounter, indicating co-prescription of AL with other drugs. Children under five had higher odds of AL and antibiotics co-prescription (OR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.46 -- 0.85) than those aged more than five years. Patients testing negative had higher odds (OR = 2.22, 95%CI: 1.65 -- 2.97) of AL and antibiotics co-prescription. Patients receiving treatment from dispensaries had higher odds (OR = 1.45, 95% CI: 0.84 -- 2.30) of AL and antibiotics co-prescription than those from served in health centres even though the deference was not statistically significant. Regardless the fact that Malaria is declining but due to lack of laboratories and mRDT in most health facilities in the rural areas, clinicians are still treating malaria presumptively. This leads them to prescribe more drugs to treat all possibilities
Facilitating factors and barriers to malaria research utilization for policy development in Malawi
BACKGROUND : Research on various determinants of health is key in providing evidence for policy development,
thereby leading to successful interventions. Utilization of research is an intricate process requiring an understanding
of contextual factors. The study was conducted to assess enhancing factors and barriers of research utilization for
malaria policy development in Malawi.
METHODS : Qualitative research approach was used through in-depth interviews with 39 key informants that included
malaria researchers, policy makers, programme managers, and key stakeholders. Purposive sampling and snowballing
techniques were used in identifying key informants. Interview transcripts were entered in QSR Nvivo 11 software for
coding and analysis.
RESULTS : Respondents identified global efforts as key in advancing knowledge translation, while local political will has
been conducive for research utilization. Other factors were availability of research, availability of diverse local researchers
and stakeholders supporting knowledge translation. While barriers included: lack of platforms for researcher-public
engagement, politics, researchers’ lack of communication skills, lack of research collaborations, funder driven research,
unknown World Health Organization policy position, and the lack of a malaria research repository.
CONCLUSION : Overall, the study identified facilitating factors to malaria research utilization for policy development in
Malawi. These factors need to be systematically coordinated to address the identified barriers and improve on malaria
research utilization in policy development. Malaria research can be key in the implementation of evidence-based
interventions to reduce the malaria burden and assist in the paradigm shift from malaria control to elimination in
Malawi.University of Pretoria Institute for Sustainable Malaria Control (UP ISMC)http://www.malariajournal.comam2016School of Health Systems and Public Health (SHSPH
Malaria prevention practices and delivery outcome: a cross sectional study of pregnant women attending a tertiary hospital in northeastern Nigeria
The combined effect of determinants on coverage of intermittent preventive treatment of malaria during pregnancy in the Kilombero Valley, Tanzania
BACKGROUND\ud
\ud
Intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy (IPTp) at routine antenatal care (ANC) clinics is an important and efficacious intervention to reduce adverse health outcomes of malaria infections during pregnancy. However, coverage for the recommended two IPTp doses is still far below the 80% target in Tanzania. This paper investigates the combined impact of pregnant women's timing of ANC attendance, health workers' IPTp delivery and different delivery schedules of national IPTp guidelines on IPTp coverage.\ud
\ud
METHODS\ud
\ud
Data on pregnant women's ANC attendance and health workers' IPTp delivery were collected from ANC card records during structured exit interviews with ANC attendees and through semi-structured interviews with health workers in south-eastern Tanzania. Women's timing of ANC visits and health worker's timing of IPTp delivery were analyzed in relation to the different national IPTp schedules and the outcome on IPTp coverage was modelled.\ud
\ud
RESULTS\ud
\ud
Among all women eligible for IPTp, 79% received a first dose of IPTp and 27% were given a second dose. Although pregnant women initiated ANC attendance late, their timing was in line with the national guidelines recommending IPTp delivery between 20-24 weeks and 28-32 weeks of gestation. Only 15% of the women delayed to the extent of being too late to be eligible for a first dose of IPTp. Less than 1% of women started ANC attendance after 32 weeks of gestation. During the second IPTp delivery period health workers delivered IPTp to significantly less women than during the first one (55% vs. 73%) contributing to low second dose coverage. Simplified IPTp guidelines for front-line health workers as recommended by WHO could lead to a 20 percentage point increase in IPTp coverage.\ud
\ud
CONCLUSIONS\ud
\ud
This study suggests that facility and policy factors are greater barriers to IPTp coverage than women's timing of ANC attendance. To maximize the benefit of the IPTp intervention, revision of existing guidelines is needed. Training on simplified IPTp messages should be consolidated as part of the extended antenatal care training to change health workers' delivery practices and increase IPTp coverage. Pregnant women's knowledge about IPTp and the risks of malaria during pregnancy should be enhanced as well as their ability and power to demand IPTp and other ANC services
