54 research outputs found

    Feasibility of Privacy-Preserving Entity Resolution on Confidential Healthcare Datasets Using Homomorphic Encryption

    Full text link
    Patient datasets contain confidential information which is protected by laws and regulations such as HIPAA and GDPR. Ensuring comprehensive patient information necessitates privacy-preserving entity resolution (PPER), which identifies identical patient entities across multiple databases from different healthcare organizations while maintaining data privacy. Existing methods often lack cryptographic security or are computationally impractical for real-world datasets. We introduce a PPER pipeline based on AMPPERE, a secure abstract computation model utilizing cryptographic tools like homomorphic encryption. Our tailored approach incorporates extensive parallelization techniques and optimal parameters specifically for patient datasets. Experimental results demonstrate the proposed method's effectiveness in terms of accuracy and efficiency compared to various baselines

    Development of a social and environmental determinants of health informatics maturity model

    Get PDF
    INTRODUCTION: Integrating social and environmental determinants of health (SEDoH) into enterprise-wide clinical workflows and decision-making is one of the most important and challenging aspects of improving health equity. We engaged domain experts to develop a SEDoH informatics maturity model (SIMM) to help guide organizations to address technical, operational, and policy gaps. METHODS: We established a core expert group consisting of developers, informaticists, and subject matter experts to identify different SIMM domains and define maturity levels. The candidate model (v0.9) was evaluated by 15 informaticists at a Center for Data to Health community meeting. After incorporating feedback, a second evaluation round for v1.0 collected feedback and self-assessments from 35 respondents from the National COVID Cohort Collaborative, the Center for Leading Innovation and Collaboration\u27s Informatics Enterprise Committee, and a publicly available online self-assessment tool. RESULTS: We developed a SIMM comprising seven maturity levels across five domains: data collection policies, data collection methods and technologies, technology platforms for analysis and visualization, analytics capacity, and operational and strategic impact. The evaluation demonstrated relatively high maturity in analytics and technological capacity, but more moderate maturity in operational and strategic impact among academic medical centers. Changes made to the tool in between rounds improved its ability to discriminate between intermediate maturity levels. CONCLUSION: The SIMM can help organizations identify current gaps and next steps in improving SEDoH informatics. Improving the collection and use of SEDoH data is one important component of addressing health inequities

    Environment Scan of Generative AI Infrastructure for Clinical and Translational Science

    Get PDF
    This study reports a comprehensive environmental scan of the generative AI (GenAI) infrastructure in the national network for clinical and translational science across 36 institutions supported by the CTSA Program led by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) at the United States. Key findings indicate a diverse range of institutional strategies, with most organizations in the experimental phase of GenAI deployment. The results underscore the need for a more coordinated approach to GenAI governance, emphasizing collaboration among senior leaders, clinicians, information technology staff, and researchers. Our analysis reveals that 53% of institutions identified data security as a primary concern, followed by lack of clinician trust (50%) and AI bias (44%), which must be addressed to ensure the ethical and effective implementation of GenAI technologies

    324 An umbrella protocol that establishes an enterprise-wide framework for the operation of a Clinical Data Warehouse

    No full text
    OBJECTIVES/GOALS: To streamline the standards and procedures for operating a research-specific, clinical data warehouse, acheived by defining roles, introducing a common language, and categorizing dataset types to provide transparency regarding data security risks inherent in the use of patient data. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: We established a Bioethics committee responsible for ensuring clinical data is securely procured, maintained, and extracted in a manner that adheres to all federal, state, and local laws. We created an operational framework in the form of an umbrella IRB protocol and shared it with the bioethics committee for feedback and approval. The protocol was approved first by the bioethics committee and subsequently by the IRB. It was then disseminated across the institution and published online for continuous reference and use by committee members, researchers, and the data warehouse service team. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: The resulting framework defined the roles of researchers, data warehouse service team members, and honest brokers; explains the procedures for accessing and securely delivering data; and lists six categories of datasets according to type and implicit risks: datasets that are preparatory for research/aggregate counts, anonymized datasets, coded datasets, limited datasets, identified datasets for recruitment purposes, and defined identified cohort datasets. The protocol is approved and in use enterprise-wide, has reduced the number of questions from stakeholders, and has given researchers, IRB members, and informatics staff confidence in the use of the clinical research data warehouse. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE: We offer our framework to CTSAs interested in streamlining their data warehouse operations. We believe the adoption of this framework will establish strong procedures for ensuring compliance with IRB requirements, data privacy, and data security while reducing barriers to clinical research

    (A-E) Selected signaling pathway schematics demonstrating increase (red bar) or decrease (blue) bar and relative amplitude (height of bar) of differentially expression in each gene and their roles in the signaling pathway depicted.

    No full text
    Green arrows indicate positive interactions or activation, red arrows indicate negative interactions or inhibition, while grey arrows indicate an unknown interaction. More details of symbol meanings can be found in the supplemental tables in the Metacore ® quick reference guide.</p

    The IRF4 gene regulatory module functions as a read-write integrator to dynamically control T helper cell fate

    Full text link
    Abstract Transcriptional regulation during CD4+ T cell fate decisions enables their differentiation into distinct states, guiding immune responses towards antibody production via Tfh cells or inflammation by Teff cells. Tfh–Teff fate commitment is regulated by mutual antagonism between the transcription factors Bcl6 and Blimp-1. Here we examined how T cell receptor (TCR) signals establish and arbitrate Bcl6–Blimp-1 counter-antagonism. We found that the TCR-signal induced transcription factor IRF4 is essential for the differentiation of Bcl6-expressing Tfh and Blimp-1-expressing Teff cells. Increased TCR signaling raised IRF4 amounts and promoted Teff fates at the expense of Tfh ones. Importantly, orthogonal induction of IRF4 expression redirected Tfh fate trajectories towards those of Teff and this occurred independently of IL-2 signals. Mechanistically, we linked greater IRF4 abundance with its recruitment towards low affinity binding sites within Teff cis-regulatory elements, including those of Prdm1. We propose that the Irf4 locus functions as the “reader” of TCR signal strength, in turn, concentration-dependent activity of IRF4 “writes” T helper fate choice.</jats:p
    corecore