The Contribution of Cancer Incidence, Stage at Diagnosis and Survival to Racial Differences in Years of Life Expectancy

African Americans have higher cancer mortality rates than whites. Understanding the relative contribution of cancer incidence, stage at diagnosis and survival after diagnosis to the racial gap in life expectancy has important implications for directing future health disparity interventions toward cancer prevention, screening and treatment. We estimated the degree to which higher cancer mortality among African Americans is due to higher incidence rates, later stage at diagnosis or worse survival after diagnosis. Stochastic model of cancer incidence and survival after diagnosis. Surveillance and Epidemiology End Result cancer registry and National Health Interview Survey data. Life expectancy if African Americans had the same cancer incidence, stage and survival after diagnosis as white adults. African-American men and women live 1.47 and 0.91 fewer years, respectively, than whites as the result of all cancers combined. Among men, racial differences in cancer incidence, stage at diagnosis and survival after diagnosis account for 1.12 (95% CI: 0.52 to 1.36), 0.17 (95% CI: −0.03 to 0.33) and 0.21 (95% CI: 0.05 to 0.34) years of the racial gap in life expectancy, respectively. Among women, incidence, stage and survival after diagnosis account for 0.41 (95% CI: −0.29 to 0.60), 0.26 (95% CI: −0.06 to 0.40) and 0.31 (95% CI: 0.05 to 0.40) years, respectively. Differences in stage had a smaller impact on the life expectancy gap compared with the impact of incidence. Differences in cancer survival after diagnosis had a significant impact for only two cancers—breast (0.14 years; 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.16) and prostate (0.05 years; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.09). In addition to breast and colorectal cancer screening, national efforts to reduce disparities in life expectancy should also target cancer prevention, perhaps through smoking cessation, and differences in survival after diagnosis among persons with breast and prostate cancer

Predictors of survival after hepatic resection among patients with colorectal liver metastasis

Studies suggest improved survival following resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CLMs). We investigated predictors of survival among patients with CLM who underwent hepatic resection using the SEER-Medicare database to identify patients ⩾65 years diagnosed with CLM, 1991–2003, who underwent hepatectomy. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify factors associated with survival after hepatectomy. Of 923 patients with CLM who underwent hepatectomy, 514 were stages I–III and developed CLM>6 months after diagnosis (metachronous), and 409 were stage IV with CLM at diagnosis (synchronous). From the date of hepatectomy, 5 year survival was 22%; younger age, being married, female gender, surgery in an NCI-designated cancer centre, fewer comorbidities, fewer positive lymph nodes, and lower grade were associated with improved survival. Both 5-fluorouracil (5FU)-based chemotherapy and hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of floxuridine-based chemotherapy following hepatectomy improved survival (HR=0.62, 95% CI: 0.50–0.78; HR=0.51, 95% CI: 0.28–0.97, respectively) in the synchronous, but not metachronous, group. The HR for overall mortality was higher in hospitals with a high vs low procedure volume (0.75, 95% CI: 0.58–0.94). A substantial subgroup of patients with CLM who undergo hepatectomy experiences long-term survival. High hospital procedure volume and use of 5FU-based or HAI-based chemotherapy after resection were associated with improved prognosis

Patient Experience of Interpersonal Processes of Care and Subsequent Utilization of Hormone Therapy for Non-Metastatic Breast Cancer

Abstract Purpose: We examined the association between patient experience of care and utilization of hormone therapy (HT) in the treatment of non-metastatic hormone-receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer. Methods: Patients newly diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer were recruited from 2006 to 2010 for a longitudinal multisite cohort study in New York, NY, Detroit, MI, and Northern California. Of 1,145 patients surveyed, 797 had HR+ tumors eligible for HT and all necessary data. We assessed patient experience 4 to 8 weeks after recruitment using 6 subscales of the Interpersonal Processes of Care (IPC) survey: compassion, discrimination, and hurriedness in communication, as well as concern elicitation, result explanation, and patient-centered decision-making. Subscales ranged from 1 to 5 where higher values indicated better experiences. HT for 5 years is standard care for HR+ breast cancer so utilization was defined as time from diagnosis to HT initiation and time from HT initiation to early discontinuation before 5 years as calculated from follow-up survey responses. We evaluated the relationship between patient experience and utilization using Cox proportional hazard models, controlling for education, income, insurance, marital status, social support, site of care, age at diagnosis, stage, grade, tumor size, Charlson comorbidity index, and chemotherapy. Results: Median age at diagnosis was 59 years (interquartile range 51–66) with the majority diagnosed at clinical stage 1 (54%) and with low or moderate grade disease (78%). Less hurried communication was associated with increased probability of HT initiation (Hazards Ratio (HR) 1.15; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 1.03, 1.30; p = 0.018). Conversely, more patient-centered decision-making was associated with increased probability of early discontinuation (HR 1.29; CI, 1.03, 1.63; p = 0.028). All other associations were null. Conclusion: While unhurried communication was associated with initiation of hormone therapy, patient-centered decision-making was associated with early discontinuation. Different aspects of patient experience may have vastly different relationships with patient utilization of health services. Actionable assessments of patient experience may require measurement along multiple dimensions.</jats:p