Irradiation to Improve the Response to Immunotherapeutic Agents in Glioblastomas.

PurposeGlioblastoma (GBM) remains an incurable disease despite extensive treatment with surgical resection, irradiation, and temozolomide. In line with many other forms of aggressive cancers, GBM is currently under consideration as a target for immunotherapy. However, GBM tends to be nonimmunogenic and exhibits a microenvironment with few or no effector T cells, a relatively low nonsynonymous somatic mutational load, and a low predicted neoantigen burden. GBM also exploits a multitude of immunosuppressive strategies.Methods and materialsA number of immunotherapeutic approaches have been tested with disappointing results. A rationale exists to combine immunotherapy and radiation therapy, which can induce an immunogenic form of cell death with T-cell activation and tumor infiltration.ResultsVarious immunotherapy agents, including immune checkpoint modulators, transforming growth factor beta receptor inhibitors, and indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase inhibitors, have been evaluated with irradiation in preclinical GBM models, with promising results, and are being further tested in clinical trials.ConclusionsThis review aims to present the basic rationale behind this emerging complementary therapeutic approach in GBM, appraise the current preclinical and clinical data, and discuss the future challenges in improving the antitumor immune response

Prostate Brachytherapy: Current States and Future Prospects

peer reviewedThe paper presents the characteristics, the place and the limits of brachytherapy in prostate radiotherapy. While sparing the rectal wall, erectile function as well as urinary continence, I(125) and Pd(103) permanent implants represent interesting approaches for good prognosis tumours in comparison to surgery or conformal external beam radiotherapy with similar cure rates. Overcoming easily the problems of organ motion and patient positioning while allowing doses per fraction as high as 10 Gy, brachytherapy is an excellent boosting method in the treatment of intermediate or unfavourable prognosis tumours of which alpha/beta is 1,5 Gy. Encouraging biological control rates of 80-90% have been published in phase II trials. Compared to external beam radiotherapy, the heterogeneity of irradiation inside the clinical target volume should increase the probability of cure as for a specific dose, a significant part will be overdosed. So far, 120-130% of the prescribed doses are delivered to the peripheral zone at the origin of 70% of tumours. On the opposite, this heterogeneity is inducing an overdosage of the urethral bed at the price of higher toxicity levels in situations of previous obstructive syndrome and urethral stenosis. A better integration of the therapeutic modalities available, brachytherapy included, should increase our curative possibilities in the radiation treatment of prostatic cancer

What do we know about the α/β for prostate cancer?

Since last decade, the debate on the parameter which reflects prostate cancer sensitivity to fractionation in a radiotherapy treatment, the α/β, has become extensive. Unlike most tumors, the low labeling indices (LI) and large potential doubling time that characterize the prostate tumor led some authors to consider that it may behave as a late responding tissue. So far, the existing studies with regard to this subject point to a low value of α/β, around 2.7 Gy, which may be considered as a therapeutic gain in relation to surrounding normal tissues by using fewer and larger fractions. The aim of this paper is to review several estimates that have been made in the last few years regarding the prostate cancer α/β both from clinical and experimental data, as well as the set of factors that have potentially influenced these evaluations

Robotic image-guided reirradiation of lateral pelvic recurrences: preliminary results

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The first-line treatment of a pelvic recurrence in a previously irradiated area is surgery. Unfortunately, few patients are deemed operable, often due to the location of the recurrence, usually too close to the iliac vessels, or the associated surgical morbidity. The objective of this study is to test the viability of robotic image-guided radiotherapy as an alternative treatment in inoperable cases.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Sixteen patients previously treated with radiotherapy were reirradiated with CyberKnife^®for lateral pelvic lesions. Recurrences of primary rectal cancer (4 patients), anal canal (6), uterine cervix cancer (4), endometrial cancer (1), and bladder carcinoma (1) were treated. The median dose of the previous treatment was 45 Gy (EqD2 range: 20 to 96 Gy). A total dose of 36 Gy in six fractions was delivered with the CyberKnife over three weeks. The responses were evaluated according to RECIST criteria.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Median follow-up was 10.6 months (1.9 to 20.5 months). The actuarial local control rate was 51.4% at one year. Median disease-free survival was 8.3 months after CyberKnife treatment. The actuarial one-year survival rate was 46%. Acute tolerance was limited to digestive grade 1 and 2 toxicities.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Robotic stereotactic radiotherapy can offer a short and well-tolerated treatment for lateral pelvic recurrences in previously irradiated areas in patients otherwise not treatable. Efficacy and toxicity need to be evaluated over the long term, but initial results are encouraging.</p

La radiothérapie par modulation d'intensité de la région para-aortique peut-elle résoudre les problèmes que pose l'épargne des organes à risque ?

peer reviewedBACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The recent RTOG guidelines for future clinical developments in gynecologic malignancies included the investigation of dose escalation in the paraaortic (PO) region which is, however, very difficult to target due to the presence of critical organs such as kidneys, liver, spinal cord, and digestive structures. The aim of this study was to investigate intensity-modulated radiotherapy's (IMRT) possibilites of either increasing, in a safe way, the dose to 50-60 Gy in case of macroscopic disease or decreasing the dose to organs at risk (OR) when treatment is given in an adjuvant setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The dosimetric charts of 14 patients irradiated to the PO region at the Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Liege, Belgium, in 2000 were analyzed in order to compare six-field conformal external-beam radiotherapy (CEBR) and five-beam IMRT approaches. Both CEBR and IMRT investigations were planned to theoretically deliver 60 Gy to the PO region in the safest way possible. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were calculated for clinical target volume (CTV), planning target volume (PTV), and OR. Student's t-test was used to compare the paired DVH data issued from CEBR and IMRT planning. RESULTS: The IMRT approach allowed to cover the PTV at a higher level as compared to CEBR. Using IMRT, the maximal dose to the spinal cord was reduced from 42.5 Gy to 26.2 Gy in comparison with CEBR (p or= 20 Gy in the IMRT approach (p < 0.00001). Irradiation of digestive structures was not different, with < 25% receiving 35 Gy. Doses to the liver remained low regardless of the method used. CONCLUSION: At 60 Gy, IMRT is largely sparing the spinal cord and kidneys as compared to CEBR and represents an interesting approach not only for dose escalation up to 50-60 Gy (probably facilitating the radiochemotherapy approaches) but also in an adjuvant setting at lower doses. The dosimetric data of this study are in the same range as those published recently with a dynamic arc conformal approach

Tumor Size Matters-Understanding Concomitant Tumor Immunity in the Context of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy with Immunotherapy.

The purpose of this study was to determine the dynamic contributions of different immune cell subsets to primary and abscopal tumor regression after hypofractionated radiation therapy (hRT) and the impact of anti-PD-1 therapy. A bilateral syngeneic FSA1 fibrosarcoma model was used in immunocompetent C3H mice, with delayed inoculation to mimic primary and microscopic disease. The effect of tumor burden on intratumoral and splenic immune cell content was delineated as a prelude to hRT on macroscopic T1 tumors with 3 fractions of 8 Gy while microscopic T2 tumors were left untreated. This was performed with and without systemic anti-PD-1. Immune profiles within T1 and T2 tumors and in spleen changed drastically with tumor burden in untreated mice with infiltrating CD4+ content declining, while the proportion of CD4+ Tregs rose. Myeloid cell representation escalated in larger tumors, resulting in major decreases in the lymphoid:myeloid ratios. In general, activation of Tregs and myeloid-derived suppressor cells allow immunogenic tumors to grow, although their relative contributions change with time. The evidence suggests that primary T1 tumors self-regulate their immune content depending on their size and this can influence the lymphoid compartment of T2 tumors, especially with respect to Tregs. Tumor burden is a major confounding factor in immune analysis that has to be taken into consideration in experimental models and in the clinic. hRT caused complete local regression of primary tumors, which was accompanied by heavy infiltration of CD8+ T cells activated to express IFN-γ and PD-1; while certain myeloid populations diminished. In spite of this active infiltrate, primary hRT failed to generate the systemic conditions required to cause abscopal regression of unirradiated microscopic tumors unless PD-1 blockade, which on its own was ineffective, was added to the RT regimen. The combination further increased local and systemically activated CD8+ T cells, but few other changes. This study emphasizes the subtle interplay between the immune system and tumors as they grow and how difficult it is for local RT, which can generate a local immune response that may help with primary tumor regression, to overcome the systemic barriers that are generated so as to effect immune regression of even small abscopal lesions

Feasibility study combining low dose rate (192)Ir brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy aiming at delivering 80-85 Gy to prostatic adenocarcinoma.

peer reviewedBACKGROUND: Increasing the radiation dose to prostatic adenocarcinoma has provided higher local control rates. A total of 80 Gy seem necessary to achieve this goal but patient set-up and prostate motion remain difficult problems to solve in conformal radiotherapy. Brachytherapy which overcomes these points could be an alternative way to external beam boost fields. We wanted to transpose the irradiation models largely used in cervix cancer treatment combining external beam radiotherapy and low dose rate brachytherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 71 patients with 19.5 and 13 ng/ml mean and median PSA levels, respectively, a dose escalation from 74 to 85 Gy was performed in four groups. RESULTS: Shifting from intraoperative placement of sources vectors (Group I) to positioning under ultrasound controls (groups II-IV), improving the implantation shape and optimizing radiation delivery to urethral bed have reduced the total dose to rectal wall under 65 Gy and to urethra under 100 Gy. Rectal/prostate dose ratio was lowered from 0.7 (Groups I-II) to 0.58 (Groups III-IV) while avoiding problems resulting from pelvic bone arch interference, prostate volume or seminal vesicles location. The mean and median follow-up periods are 28 and 18 months. In Groups III and IV 85% of patients without hormonotherapy treated with 80-85 Gy normalized PSA under 1 ng/ml within 6 months. No severe late effect has been noted for patients implanted under echographic control. CONCLUSIONS: The method described allows to deliver 85 Gy. Longer follow-up is however needed but the levels of dose delivered are not expected to induce prohibitive side effects