Review of 1,447 Breast Augmentation Patients Using PERTHESE Silicone Implants

Introduction A survey of surgeons in Brazil on their experience with PERTHESE silicone breast implants was performed. Materials and methods Surgeons that used PERTHESE implants between 2002 and 2008 were surveyed on the shape and volume of the implants used, surgical incision site, surgical plane of insertion, key postoperative complications, and surgeon and patient satisfaction. Results The survey had a response rate of 20%, with ten surgeons reporting data on 1447 patients. The majority of the implants used were 200-300 cc, round, and high profile. Preference for the traditional inframammary incision site (47% of patients) was favored over transaxillary (33%) and periareolar (19%), and both subglandular (55%) and submuscular (44%) planes of insertion were used. Over 97% of surgeons and patients were satisfied with the results and surgeons indicated that the implants were easy to use. Conclusions This review demonstrates that these implants are safe, maybe easier to introduce than other implants, and result in a high level of surgeon and patient satisfaction.341111

Two methods of anesthesia for rhinoplasty in outpatient setting

This retrospective study was designed with the aim to evaluate suitability of two methods of anesthesia: local anesthesia combined with sedation (midazolam + pethidine) or dissociative (midazolam + ketamine hydrochloride) anesthesia for performing rhinoplasties in an outpatient setting. During 1985-1994, we performed 516 rhinoplasties in 464 patients. Sedation and local anesthesia was used in 263, and dissociative and local anesthesia in 253 procedures. Both methods were well tolerated by the patients, no serious anesthetic complications were seen, and the clinical problems in connection with anesthesia were acceptably low. The use of sedation technique and dissociative anesthesia in combination with local anesthesia have both proved to be safe and effective anesthetic methods for performing rhinoplasty