Effectiveness of screening for atrial fibrillation and its determinants. A meta-analysis

<div><p>Background</p><p>Many atrial fibrillation patients eligible for oral anticoagulants are unaware of the presence of AF, and improved detection is necessary to facilitate thromboprophylaxis against stroke.</p><p>Objective</p><p>To assess the effectiveness of screening for AF compared to no screening and to compare efficacy outcomes of different screening strategies.</p><p>Materials and methods</p><p>Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE and MEDLINE from Jan 1, 2000 –Dec 31, 2015 were searched. Studies employing systematic or opportunistic screening and using ECG or pulse palpation in populations age ≥40 years were included. Data describing study and patient characteristics and number of patients with new AF were extracted. The outcome was the incidence of previously undiagnosed AF.</p><p>Results</p><p>We identified 25 unique (3 RCTs and 22 observational) studies (n = 88 786) from 14 countries. The incidence of newly detected AF due to screening was 1.5% (95% CI 1.1 to 1.8%). Systematic screening was more effective than opportunistic: 1.8% (95% CI 1.4 to 2.3%) vs. 1.1% (95% CI 0.6 to 1.6%), p<0.05, GP-led screening than community based: 1.9% (95% CI 1.4 to 2.4%) vs. 1.1% (95% CI 0.7 to 1.6%), p<0.05, and repeated heart rhythm measurements than isolated assessments of rhythm: 2.1% (95% CI 1.5–2.8) vs. 1.2% (95% CI 0.8–1.6), p<0.05. Only heart rhythm measurement frequency had statistical significance in a multivariate meta-regression model (p<0.05).</p><p>Conclusions</p><p>Active screening for AF, whether systematic or opportunistic, is effective beginning from 40 years of age. The organisation of screening process may be more important than technical solutions used for heart rhythm assessment.</p></div

Effects of selective carotid body stimulation with adenosine in conscious humans

KEY POINTS: In humans, excitation of peripheral chemoreceptors with systemic hypoxia causes hyperventilation, hypertension and tachycardia. However, the contribution of particular chemosensory areas (carotid vs. aortic bodies) to this response is unclear. We showed that selective stimulation of the carotid body by the injection of adenosine into the carotid artery causes a dose‐dependent increase in minute ventilation and blood pressure with a concomitant decrease in heart rate in conscious humans. The ventilatory response was abolished and the haemodynamic response was diminished following carotid body ablation. We found that the magnitude of adenosine evoked responses in minute ventilation and blood pressure was analogous to the responses evoked by hypoxia. By contrast, opposing heart rate responses were evoked by adenosine (bradycardia) vs. hypoxia (tachycardia). Intra‐carotid adenosine administration may provide a novel method for perioperative assessment of the effectiveness of carotid body ablation, which has been recently proposed as a treatment strategy for sympathetically‐mediated diseases. ABSTRACT: Stimulation of peripheral chemoreceptors by acute hypoxia causes an increase in minute ventilation (VI), heart rate (HR) and arterial blood pressure (BP). However, the contribution of particular chemosensory areas, such as carotid (CB) vs. aortic bodies, to this response in humans remains unknown. We performed a blinded, randomized and placebo‐controlled study in 11 conscious patients (nine men, two women) undergoing common carotid artery angiography. Doses of adenosine ranging from 4 to 512 μg or placebo solution of a matching volume were administered in randomized order via a diagnostic catheter located in a common carotid artery. Separately, ventilatory and haemodynamic responses to systemic hypoxia were also assessed. Direct excitation of a CB with intra‐arterial adenosine increased VI, systolic BP, mean BP and decreased HR. No responses in these variables were seen after injections of placebo. The magnitude of the ventilatory and haemodynamic responses depended on both the dose of adenosine used and on the level of chemosensitivity as determined by the ventilatory response to hypoxia. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of the CB abolished the adenosine evoked respiratory response and partially depressed the cardiovascular response in one participant. The results of the present study confirm the excitatory role of purines in CB physiology in humans and suggest that adenosine may be used for selective stimulation and assessment of CB activity. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01939912

Carotid body modulation in systolic heart failure from the clinical perspective

Augmented sensitivity of peripheral chemoreceptors (PChS) is a common finding in systolic heart failure (HF). It is related to lower left ventricle systolic function, higher plasma concentrations of natriuretic peptides, worse exercise tolerance and greater prevalence of atrial fibrillation compared to patients with normal PChS. The magnitude of ventilatory response to the activation of peripheral chemoreceptors is proportional to the level of heart rate (tachycardia) and blood pressure (hypertension) responses. All these responses can be measured non‐invasively in a safe and reproducible fashion using different methods employing either hypoxia or hypercapnia. Current interventions aimed at modulation of peripheral chemoreceptors in HF are focused on carotid bodies (CBs). There is a clear link between afferent signalling from CBs and sympathetic overactivity, which remains the priority target of modern HF treatment. However, CB modulation therapies may face several potential obstacles: (1) As evidenced by HF trials, an excessive inhibition of sympathetic system may be harmful. (2) Proximity of critical anatomical structures (important vessels and nerves) makes surgical and transcutaneous interventions on CB technically demanding. (3) Co‐existence of atherosclerosis in the area of carotid artery bifurcation increases the risk of central embolic events related to CB modulation. (4) The relative contribution of CBs vs. aortic bodies to sympathetic activation in HF patients is unclear. (5) Choosing optimal candidates for CB modulation from the population of HF patients may be problematic. (6) There is a risk of nocturnal hypoxia following CB ablation – mostly after bilateral procedures and in patients with concomitant obstructive sleep apnoea. [Image: see text