15-PGJ2, but not thiazolidinediones, inhibits cell growth, induces apoptosis, and causes downregulation of Stat3 in human oral SCCa cells

Activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) has been linked to induction of differentiation, cell growth inhibition and apoptosis in several types of human cancer. However, the possible effects of PPARγ agonists on human oral squamous cell carcinoma have not yet been reported. In this study, treatment with 15-deoxy-Δ12,14-PGJ2 (15-PGJ2), a natural PPARγ ligand, induced a significant reduction of oral squamous cell carcinoma cell growth, which was mainly attributed to upregulation of apoptosis. Interestingly, rosiglitazone and ciglitazone, two members of the thiazolidinedione family of PPARγ activators, did not exert a growth inhibitory effect. Given the critical role that the oncogene signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (Stat3) plays in head and neck carcinogenesis, its potential regulation by PPARγ ligands was also examined. Treatment of oral squamous cell carcinoma cells with 15-PGJ2 induced an initial reduction and eventual elimination of both phosphorylated and unphosphorylated Stat3 protein levels. In contrast, other PPARγ did not induce similar effects. Our results provide the first evidence of significant antineoplastic effects of 15-PGJ2 on human oral squamous cell carcinoma cells, which may be related to downmodulation of Stat3 and are at least partly mediated through PPARγ-independent events

Searching for molecular markers in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) by statistical and bioinformatic analysis of larynx-derived SAGE libraries

Background: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is one of the most common malignancies in humans. The average 5-year survival rate is one of the lowest among aggressive cancers, showing no significant improvement in recent years. When detected early, HNSCC has a good prognosis, but most patients present metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis, which significantly reduces survival rate. Despite extensive research, no molecular markers are currently available for diagnostic or prognostic purposes. Methods: Aiming to identify differentially-expressed genes involved in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) development and progression, we generated individual Serial Analysis of Gene Expression (SAGE) libraries from a metastatic and non-metastatic larynx carcinoma, as well as from a normal larynx mucosa sample. Approximately 54,000 unique tags were sequenced in three libraries. Results: Statistical data analysis identified a subset of 1,216 differentially expressed tags between tumor and normal libraries, and 894 differentially expressed tags between metastatic and non-metastatic carcinomas. Three genes displaying differential regulation, one down-regulated (KRT31) and two up-regulated (BST2, MFAP2), as well as one with a non-significant differential expression pattern (GNA15) in our SAGE data were selected for real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in a set of HNSCC samples. Consistent with our statistical analysis, quantitative PCR confirmed the upregulation of BST2 and MFAP2 and the downregulation of KRT31 when samples of HNSCC were compared to tumor-free surgical margins. As expected, GNA15 presented a non-significant differential expression pattern when tumor samples were compared to normal tissues. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study reporting SAGE data in head and neck squamous cell tumors. Statistical analysis was effective in identifying differentially expressed genes reportedly involved in cancer development. The differential expression of a subset of genes was confirmed in additional larynx carcinoma samples and in carcinomas from a distinct head and neck subsite. This result suggests the existence of potential common biomarkers for prognosis and targeted-therapy development in this heterogeneous type of tumor.Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo/FAPESP [05/51467-0]; [04/12054-9]; [07/50894-7]Ludwig Institute for Cancer ResearchConselho Nacional de Pesquisas/CNPqCoordenacao de Aperfeicoamento do Pessoal do Ensino Superior/CAPE

Salivary Gland Disorders and Diseases

Saliva plays an important role in maintaining healthy oral mucosa and teeth as well as oral function by continually covering and lubricating the oral tissues. Salivary gland dysfunction designates decreased saliva flow rate (salivary gland hypofunction), increased saliva flow rate (sialorrhea or hypersalivation), and changed saliva composition. Xerostomia (the subjective feeling of oral dryness) is often associated with salivary gland hypofunction and may severely affect nutritional intake, social interaction and quality of life. Local or systemic disorders and diseases are common causes of compromised saliva secretion. Some of these are related to gland pathology or to the pathophysiological conditions of the host, whereas others affect the gland innervation or are an iatrogenic result of treatment of a disease (e.g., radiation therapy for head and neck cancer, side effects of medications). In general, many patients suffering from diseases that influence salivary gland function also undergo treatments that may impair saliva secretion and/or induce xerostomia as an adverse effect. Consequently, it can be difficult to distinguish what can be attributed to the disease per se or what can be induced by treatment (e.g., medication intake). Thus, a thorough diagnostic workup and early diagnosis of salivary gland dysfunction are crucial to provide appropriate evidence-based treatment of salivary gland dysfunction to prevent oral sequelae and to initiate individualized alleviating management strategies of xerostomia.</p

PPARγ-independent induction of growth arrest and apoptosis in prostate and bladder carcinoma

Background Although PPARγ antagonists have shown considerable pre-clinical efficacy, recent studies suggest PPARγ ligands induce PPARγ-independent effects. There is a need to better define such effects to permit rational utilization of these agents. Methods We have studied the effects of a range of endogenous and synthetic PPARγ ligands on proliferation, growth arrest (FACS analysis) and apoptosis (caspase-3/7 activation and DNA fragmentation) in multiple prostate carcinoma cell lines (DU145, PC-3 and LNCaP) and in a series of cell lines modelling metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder (TSU-Pr1, TSU-Pr1-B1 and TSU-Pr1-B2). Results 15-deoxy-prostaglandin J2 (15dPGJ2), troglitazone (TGZ) and to a lesser extent ciglitazone exhibited inhibitory effects on cell number; the selective PPARγ antagonist GW9662 did not reverse these effects. Rosiglitazone and pioglitazone had no effect on proliferation. In addition, TGZ induced G0/G1 growth arrest whilst 15dPGJ2 induced apoptosis. Conclusion Troglitazone and 15dPGJ2 inhibit growth of prostate and bladder carcinoma cell lines through different mechanisms and the effects of both agents are PPARγ-independent