Review of Health Sector Services Fund Implementation and Experience

The Health Sector Services Fund (HSSF) is an innovative scheme established by the Government of Kenya (GOK) to disburse funds directly to health facilities to enable them to improve health service delivery to local communities. HSSF empowers local communities to take charge of their health by actively involving them through the Health Facility Management Committees (HFMCs) in the identification of their health priorities and in planning and implementation of initiatives responsive to the identified priorities. Following a successful pilot of a similar mechanism, the strategy was scaled up nationwide, starting in 2010. Following the recent general election in Kenya, dramatic changes to the health system are being considered and introduced, including devolution of government functions to 47 semi-autonomous counties, the merging of the two ministries of health, and the abolition of user fees at health centres and dispensaries. Given the experience of nearly 3 years of HSSF implementation, and the context of these important changes in the organisation of health service delivery, a review of experiences to date with HSSF and key issues to consider moving forward is timely. The overall goal of HSSF is to generate sufficient resources for providing adequate curative, preventive and promotive services at community, dispensary and health centre levels, and to account for the resources in an efficient and transparent manner. HSSF can cover items such as facility operations and maintenance, refurbishment, support staff, allowances, communications, utilities, non-drug supplies, fuel and community based activities. DANIDA and the World Bank are currently partnering with the MOPHS in supporting the HSSF’s phased implementation which began in October 2010 with public health centres, and public dispensaries in July 2012. Following a facility stakeholder’s forum, HFMCs should develop annual work plans (AWPs) and quarterly implementation plans (QIPs). HSSF resources are credited directly to each designated facility’s bank account every quarter and to the District Health Management Team (DHMT): KSH 112,000 (1,339 USD) for health centres, KSH 27,500 (327 USD) for dispensaries and 131,500 (1,565 USD) for DHMTs. Other funds available to the facility, such as user fee revenue, and grants and donations received locally, should be banked in the same account, and managed and accounted for together with HSSF funds from national level. All funds should be managed by the Health Facility Management Committee (HFMC) which includes community representatives, according to the financial guidelines approved by the Ministry of Health (MOH). Funds can only be spent on receipt of an Authority to Incur Expenditure (AIE) from national level. Facilities must then account for funds using monthly and quarterly financial reports, and expenditures are recorded in a specific software called Navision. Facility level supervision and support is provided by the DHMT and county based accountants (CBAs) hired specifically for HSSF; and at national level HSSF oversight is provided by the National Health Sector Committee. This review had the following objectives: 1. To describe the process of HSSF implementation to date, including facilities covered, funds disbursed, and activities undertaken. 2. To review evidence on the experience with HSSF implementation 3. To identify key issues including devolution for consideration in future planning around HSSF These objectives have been addressed through review of policy documents, administrative reports, and research studies related to HSSF; and interviews with key stakeholders in MOPHS, DANIDA and the World Bank, to obtain updates on HSSF implementation and experience

Crises and resilience at the frontline-public health facility managers under devolution in a sub-county on the Kenyan Coast

BACKGROUND: Public primary health care (PHC) facilities are for many individuals the first point of contact with the formal health care system. These facilities are managed by professional nurses or clinical officers who are recognised to play a key role in implementing health sector reforms and facilitating initiatives aimed at strengthening community involvement. Little in-depth research exists about the dimensions and challenges of these managers' jobs, or on the impact of decentralisation on their roles and responsibilities. In this paper, we describe the roles and responsibilities of PHC managers-or 'in-charges' in Kenya, and their challenges and coping strategies, under accelerated devolution. METHODS: The data presented in this paper is part of a wider set of activities aimed at understanding governance changes under devolution in Kenya, under the umbrella of a 'learning site'. A learning site is a long term process of collaboration between health managers and researchers deciding together on key health system questions and interventions. Data were collected through seven formal in depth interviews and observations at four PHC facilities as well as eight in depth interviews and informal interactions with sub-county managers from June 2013 to July 2014. Drawing on the Aragon framework of organisation capacity we discuss the multiple accountabilities, daily routines, challenges and coping strategies among PHC facility managers. RESULTS: PHC in-charges perform complex and diverse roles in a difficult environment with relatively little formal preparation. Their key concerns are lack of job clarity and preparedness, the difficulty of balancing multidirectional accountability responsibilities amidst significant resource shortages, and remuneration anxieties. We show that day-to-day management in an environment of resource constraints and uncertainty requires PHC in-charges who are resilient, reflective, and continuously able to learn and adapt. We highlight the importance of leadership development including the building of critical soft skills such as relationship building

Priority setting for health in the context of devolution in Kenya: implications for health equity and community-based primary care

Devolution changes the locus of power within a country from central to sub-national levels. In 2013, Kenya devolved health and other services from central government to 47 new sub-national governments (known as counties). This transition seeks to strengthen democracy and accountability, increase community participation, improve efficiency and reduce inequities. With changing responsibilities and power following devolution reforms, comes the need for priority-setting at the new county level. Priority-setting arises as a consequence of the needs and demand for healthcare resources exceeding the resources available, resulting in the need for some means of choosing between competing demands. We sought to explore the impact of devolution on priority-setting for health equity and community health services. We conducted key informant and in-depth interviews with health policymakers, health providers and politicians from 10 counties (n = 269 individuals) and 14 focus group discussions with community members based in 2 counties (n = 146 individuals). Qualitative data were analysed using the framework approach. We found Kenya’s devolution reforms were driven by the need to demonstrate responsiveness to county contexts, with positive ramifications for health equity in previously neglected counties. The rapidity of the process, however, combined with limited technical capacity and guidance has meant that decision-making and prioritization have been captured and distorted for political and power interests. Less visible community health services that focus on health promotion, disease prevention and referral have been neglected within the prioritization process in favour of more tangible curative health services. The rapid transition in power carries a degree of risk of not meeting stated objectives. As Kenya moves forward, decision-makers need to address the community health gap and lay down institutional structures, processes and norms which promote health equity for all Kenyans

"For how long are we going to take the tablets?" Kenyan stakeholders' views on priority investments to sustainably tackle soil-transmitted helminths.

Recent global commitments to shift responsibility for Neglected Tropical Disease (NTD) control to affected countries reflect a renewed emphasis on sustainability, away from aid-dependency. This calls for a better understanding of how domestic stakeholders perceive investments in different strategies for NTD control. Soil transmitted helminths (STH) are among the NTDs targeted for elimination as a public health problem by international agencies through mass drug administration, provided periodically to at-risk population groups, often using drugs donated by pharmaceutical companies. This study was conducted in Kenya at a time when responsibilities for long running STH programmes were transitioning from external to national and sub-national agencies. Following an initial assessment in which we identified key domestic stakeholders and reviewed relevant scientific and government documents, the perspectives of stakeholders working in health, education, community engagement and sanitation were investigated through semi-structured interviews with national level policymakers, county level policymakers, and frontline implementers in one high-STH burden county, Kwale. Our conceptual framework on sustainability traced a progression in thinking, from ensuring financial stability through the technical ability to adapt to changing circumstances, and ultimately to a situation where a programme is prioritised by domestic policymakers because empowered communities demand it. It was clear from our interviews that most Kenyan stakeholders sought to be at the final stage in this progression. Interviewees criticised long-term investment in mass drug administration, the approach favoured predominantly by external agencies, for failing to address underlying causes of STH. Instead they identified three synergistic priority areas for investment: changes in institutional structures and culture to reduce working in silos; building community demand and ownership; and increased policymaker engagement on underlying socioeconomic and environmental causes of STH. Although challenging to implement, the shift in responsibility from external agencies to domestic stakeholders may lead to emergence of new strategic directions

Research involving health providers and managers: Ethical issues faced by researchers conducting diverse health policy and systems research in Kenya

There is a growing interest in the ethics of Health Policy and Systems Research (HPSR), and especially in areas that have particular ethical salience across HPSR. Hyder et al (2014) provide an initial framework to consider this, and call for more conceptual and empirical work. In this paper, we respond by examining the ethical issues that arose for researchers over the course of conducting three HPSR studies in Kenya in which health managers and providers were key participants. All three studies involved qualitative work including observations and individual and group interviews. Many of the ethical dilemmas researchers faced only emerged over the course of the fieldwork, or on completion, and were related to interactions and relationships between individuals operating at different levels or positions in health/research systems. The dilemmas reveal significant ethical challenges for these forms of HPSR, and show that potential 'solutions' to dilemmas often lead to new issues and complications. Our experiences support the value of research ethics frameworks, and suggest that these can be enriched by incorporating careful consideration of context embedded social relations into research planning and conduct. Many of these essential relational elements of ethical practice, and of producing quality data, are given stronger emphasis in social science research ethics than in epidemiological, clinical or biomedical research ethics, and are particularly relevant where health systems are understood as social and political constructs. We conclude with practical and research implications

Exploring the use of solid fuels for cooking and household air pollution in informal settlements through photovoice: The Fuel to Pot study in Ndirande (Malawi) and Mukuru (Kenya)

Introduction: Worldwide, 2.4 billion people rely on solid fuels such as wood or charcoal for cooking, leading to approximately 3.2 million deaths per year from illnesses attributable to household air pollution. Across Africa, household air pollution generated by solid fuel use accounts for nearly 700,000 deaths each year. Most studies to date have focused either household air pollution exposure, its impacts on particular health outcomes or on the efficacy of mitigation interventions. However, the economic, social, and cultural determinants of household air pollution in Africa are still poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to explore people's experience of using solid fuels for cooking in two informal settlements, Ndirande in Malawi and Mukuru in Kenya, and the associated harms caused by household air pollution. Methods: We adopted a community-based participatory method, photovoice, which was conducted with 9 participants in Ndirande and 10 participants in Mukuru. Participants took pictures reflecting their experiences and perceptions of household air pollution harms over a two-week period, and later discussed, sorted and analysed those in a series of meetings. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data. Results: With their pictures, participants described fuel stacking and switching behaviours in their communities. They described a mix of charcoal, firewood and other biomass fuels use. They also expressed their awareness and perceptions of the harms caused by smoke when cooking. Participants explained the simple behaviours used by residents to minimize the harms of household air pollution to themselves and within their own household. Other themes explored the roles and responsibilities for procuring fuels in the home, and the stated solutions required to address the issues and manage the transition to cleaner fuels in those informal settlements. Conclusion: This study highlights not only the need to understand the daily life, priorities and concerns of those who use solid fuels on informal settlements, but also the urgency to place them and their experience at the heart of the solutions that will reduce the health harms of household air pollution.No PovertyGood Health and Well-BeingAffordable and Clean EnergyReduced InequalitiesSustainable Cities and Communitie

Advancing the science behind human resources for health: highlights from the Health Policy and Systems Research Reader on Human Resources for Health

Health workers are central to people-centred health systems, resilient economies and sustainable development. Given the rising importance of the health workforce, changing human resource for health (HRH) policy and practice and recent health policy and systems research (HPSR) advances, it is critical to reassess and reinvigorate the science behind HRH as part of health systems strengthening and social development more broadly. Building on the recently published Health Policy and Systems Research Reader on Human Resources for Health (the Reader), this commentary reflects on the added value of HPSR underpinning HRH. HPSR does so by strengthening the multi-disciplinary base and rigour of HRH research by (1) valuing diverse research inferences and (2) deepening research enquiry and quality. It also anchors the relevance of HRH research for HRH policy and practice by (3) broadening conceptual boundaries and (4) strengthening policy engagement. Most importantly, HPSR enables us to transform HRH from being faceless numbers or units of health producers to the heart and soul of health systems and vital change agents in our communities and societies. Health workers’ identities and motivation, daily routines and negotiations, and training and working environments are at the centre of successes and failures of health interventions, health system functioning and broader social development. Further, in an increasingly complex globalised economy, the expansion of the health sector as an arena for employment and the liberalisation of labour markets has contributed to the unprecedented movement of health workers, many or most of whom are women, not only between public and private health sectors, but also across borders. Yet, these political, human development and labour market realities are often set aside or elided altogether. Health workers’ lives and livelihoods, their contributions and commitments, and their individual and collective agency are ignored. The science of HRH, offering new discoveries and deeper understanding of how universal health coverage and the Sustainable Development Goals are dependent on millions of health workers globally, has the potential to overcome this outdated and ineffective orthodoxy

‘There we are failing’ … Infection prevention practices associated factors among nurses working in public and private newborn units in Kenyan hospitals

Abstract Background: Small and sick newborns continue to die in low- and middle-income countries as a result of among other causes, infection. Despite the existence of guidelines for infection prevention, little is known on practices and associated factors among nurses working in newborn units in many developing nations. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess nurses’ practices and their perspectives on what influences their ability to adhere to infection prevention and control (IPC) norms in newborn units.Methods This qualitative study used an ethnographic research design to collect data. 150 hours of observations and through purposeful sampling, nurses working in the newborn units in three hospitals in Nairobi were interviewed using an interview guide. The face to face interviews lasted between 45-60 mins and were digitally audiotaped, transcribed verbatim and translated into English where necessary. Data were imported into Nvivo 10 software for management. All data were anonymised and subjected to thematic analysis.Results A total of 10 nurses from public, 11 from private and 8 from faith-based hospitals participated in the study. Structural organization factors such as proper ward layout, adequate staffing, controlled access of visitors on the ward, involvement of a security officer and presence of an isolation room were factors that facilitated nurses’ observance of infection control on the newborn units. On the other hand, overcrowding, absence of isolation room, improper ward layout, absence of hand hygiene resources, and uncontrolled presence of visitors and lack of enforcement of IPC protocol acted as barriers to non-adherence to IPC.Conclusions Knowledge of Infection prevention and control procedures among nurses may be necessary but are unlikely to be sufficient to deliver improved care. A deliberate investment in organization factors to improve the work environment can facilitate nurses’ ability to provide quality newborn care.</jats:p

"I train and mentor, they take them": a qualitative study of nurses' perspectives of neonatal nursing expertise and its development in Kenyan hospitals

Aims and Objectives Neonatal inpatient care is reliant on experienced nursing care, yet little is known about how Kenyan hospitals foster the development of newborn nursing experience in newborn units. Design A Qualitative ethnographic design. Methods Face to face 29 in depth interviews were conducted with nurses providing neonatal care in one private, one faith based and one public hospital in Nairobi, Kenya between January 2017 and March 2018. All data were transcribed verbatim, coded in the original language and analysed using a framework approach. Results Across the sectors, nurses perceived experience as important to the provision of quality care. They noted that hospitals could foster experience through recruitment, orientation, continuous learning and retention. However, while the private hospital facilitated experience building the public and faith‐based hospitals experienced challenges due to human resource management practices and nursing shortages. Conclusion Health sector context influenced how experience was developed among nurses. Implications Nurturing experience will require that different health sectors adopt better recruitment for people interested in NBU work, better orientation and fewer rotations even without specialist nurse training