920 research outputs found
The supremum of autoconvolutions, with applications to additive number theory
We adapt a number-theoretic technique of Yu to prove a purely analytic
theorem: if f(x) is in L^1 and L^2, is nonnegative, and is supported on an
interval of length I, then the supremum of the convolution f*f is at least
0.631 \| f \|_1^2 / I. This improves the previous bound of 0.591389 \| f \|_1^2
/ I. Consequently, we improve the known bounds on several related
number-theoretic problems. For a subset A of {1,2, ..., n}, let g be the
maximum multiplicity of any element of the multiset {a+b: a,b in A}. Our main
corollary is the inequality gn>0.631|A|^2, which holds uniformly for all g, n,
and A.Comment: 17 pages. to appear in IJ
A problem of Rankin on sets without geometric progressions
A geometric progression of length and integer ratio is a set of numbers
of the form for some positive real number and
integer . For each integer , a greedy algorithm is used to
construct a strictly decreasing sequence of positive
real numbers with such that the set contains no geometric
progression of length and integer ratio. Moreover, is a maximal
subset of that contains no geometric progression of length and
integer ratio. It is also proved that there is a strictly increasing sequence
of positive integers with such that for all .
The set gives a new lower bound for the maximum cardinality of a
subset of the set of integers that contains no geometric
progression of length and integer ratio.Comment: 15 page
Fraenkel's Partition and Brown's Decomposition
Denote the sequence ([ (n-x') / x ])_{n=1}^\infty by B(x, x'), a so-called
Beatty sequence. Fraenkel's Partition Theorem gives necessary and sufficient
conditions for B(x, x') and B(y, y') to tile the positive integers, i.e., for
B(x, x') \cap B(y, y') = \emptyset and B(x, x') \cup B(y, y') = {1,2, 3, ...}.
Fix 0 < x < 1, and let c_k = 1 if k \in B(x, 0), and c_k = 0 otherwise, i.e.,
c_k=[ (k+1) / x ] - [ k / x]. For a positive integer m let C_m be the binary
word c_1c_2c_3... c_m. Brown's Decomposition gives integers q_1, q_2, ...,
independent of m and growing at least exponentially, and integers t, z_0, z_1,
z_2, ..., z_t (depending on m) such that C_m =
C_{q_t}^{z_t}C_{q_{t-1}}^{z_{t-1}} ... C_{q_1}^{z_1}C_{q_0}^{z_0}. In other
words, Brown's Decomposition gives a sparse set of initial segments of C_\infty
and an explicit decomposition of C_m (for every m) into a product of these
initial segments.Comment: 19 page
Irrational numbers associated to sequences without geometric progressions
Let s and k be integers with s \geq 2 and k \geq 2. Let g_k^{(s)}(n) denote
the cardinality of the largest subset of the set {1,2,..., n} that contains no
geometric progression of length k whose common ratio is a power of s. Let
r_k(\ell) denote the cardinality of the largest subset of the set
{0,1,2,\ldots, \ell -1\} that contains no arithmetric progression of length k.
The limit exists and
converges to an irrational number.Comment: 7 page
On sequences without geometric progressions
An improved upper bound is obtained for the density of sequences of positive
integers that contain no k-term geometric progression.Comment: 4 pages; minor correctio
- …
