Cardiac troponin T is necessary for normal development in the embryonic chick heart

The heart is the first functioning organ to develop during embryogenesis. The formation of the heart is a tightly regulated and complex process, and alterations to its development can result in congenital heart defects. Mutations in sarcomeric proteins, such as alpha myosin heavy chain and cardiac alpha actin, have now been associated with congenital heart defects in humans, often with atrial septal defects. However, cardiac troponin T (cTNT encoded by gene TNNT2) has not. Using gene-specific antisense oligonucleotides, we have investigated the role of cTNT in chick cardiogenesis. TNNT2 is expressed throughout heart development and in the postnatal heart. TNNT2-morpholino treatment resulted in abnormal atrial septal growth and a reduction in the number of trabeculae in the developing primitive ventricular chamber. External analysis revealed the development of diverticula from the ventricular myocardial wall which showed no evidence of fibrosis and still retained a myocardial phenotype. Sarcomeric assembly appeared normal in these treated hearts. In humans, congenital ventricular diverticulum is a rare condition, which has not yet been genetically associated. However, abnormal haemodynamics is known to cause structural defects in the heart. Further, structural defects, including atrial septal defects and congenital diverticula, have previously been associated with conduction anomalies. Therefore, to provide mechanistic insights into the effect that cTNT knockdown has on the developing heart, quantitative PCR was performed to determine the expression of the shear stress responsive gene NOS3 and the conduction gene TBX3. Both genes were differentially expressed compared to controls. Therefore, a reduction in cTNT in the developing heart results in abnormal atrial septal formation and aberrant ventricular morphogenesis. We hypothesize that alterations to the haemodynamics, indicated by differential NOS3 expression, causes these abnormalities in growth in cTNT knockdown hearts. In addition, the muscular diverticula reported here suggest a novel role for mutations of structural sarcomeric proteins in the pathogenesis of congenital cardiac diverticula. From these studies, we suggest TNNT2 is a gene worthy of screening for those with a congenital heart defect, particularly atrial septal defects and ventricular diverticula

Synthese und präklinische Evaluation von neuen antioxidativen Substanzen zur Neuroprotektion

Oxidativer Stress ist seit über 25 Jahren als ein Charakteristikum vieler pathologischer Prozesse bekannt. Helmut Sies beschrieb bereits in den 1980er Jahren oxidativen Stress als Störung in der prooxidativ – antioxidativen Balance zugunsten der prooxidativen Seite, wodurch es potentiell zu Schäden in verschiedenen Geweben kommt. Oxidativer Stress tritt sowohl bei neurodegenerativen Erkrankungen wie Morbus Alzheimer, Morbus Parkinson und zerebraler Ischämie, bei peripheren Erkrankungen wie Arteriosklerose, als auch beim Alterungsprozess per se auf und wird als Ursache oder zumindest als ein krankheitsfördernder Faktor diskutiert. Die in in vitro-Experimenten als vielversprechend antioxidativ getesteten Substanzen (meist phenolhaltig) ergaben in mehreren klinischen Studien keinen signifikanten Vorteil. Um die Ursachen dieser Ergebnisse näher zu analysieren, wurde in der vorliegenden Arbeit auf Basis des cytoprotektiven Phenothiazins, einem aromatischen trizyklischen Amin, der Einfluss von verschiedenen Substituenten im Hinblick auf Lipophilie, Radikalstabilisierung und Löslichkeit des Moleküls chemisch vorhergesagt. Anhand dieser in silicio Struktur-Wirkungs-Beziehung wurden anschließend neue Modellsubstanzen synthetisiert, welche sich systematisch in den drei zuvor genannten Parametern unterschieden. Dies wurde durch Substitution von unterschiedlich langen Fettsäureketten, von löslichkeitsbeeinflussenden funktionellen Gruppen, oder durch Anellierung zusätzlicher aromatischer Ringe erreicht. In den folgenden Versuchen zu antioxidativer Kapazität, zellulärem Überleben, Lipidperoxidation und Proteinoxidation zeigte sich, dass mit gesteigerter Stabilität der korrespondierenden Radikale und mit wachsender Lipophilie die antioxidativ cytoprotektive Aktivität der neuen Derivate bis zu einer gewissen Grenze (logP ≈ 7) signifikant zunahm; über diesen Wert hinaus sank die Effektivität wieder ab. Benzanellierte Phenothiazine entwickelten mit EC50-Werten von ungefähr 8-10 nM die höchste mittlere effektive Wirkkonzentration in oxidativ geschädigten, klonalen hippocampalen Neuronen (HT-22 Zellen). Dies entspricht einer etwa 20-fachen Verbesserung gegenüber α-Tocopherol, welches bisher als bestes natürliches lipophiles Antioxidans angesehen wurde. Im Vergleich zu Phenothiazin erreichen die neuen Antioxidantien immerhin eine höhere Effektivität um den Faktor 4. Folglich sind es sowohl Aspekte der Löslichkeit und der Distribution, welche die Potenz der gegenwärtigen Antioxidantien limitieren als auch Aspekte der Radikalstabilisierung, die Einfluss auf die primäre Wirksamkeit nehmen. Dieses Wissen sollte beim zukünftigen Design neuer, antioxidativ potenter Moleküle im Hinblick auf ihren langfristigen Einsatz bei neurodegenerativen Erkrankungen von Nutzen sein.Oxidative stress has been known as a common feature of a variety of pathologies for more than 25 years. It occurs in neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s disease and cerebral ischaemia, as well as in the process of aging and is discussed as causative or disease-promoting factor. In in vitro-experiments, several antioxidative substances (almost all phenols) have shown promising results, but in several clinical studies, those compounds were not able to evoke significant benefits. Subsequent in vitro-investigations on a cellular level have shown favourable neuroprotective characteristics of bisarylimines as compared to phenols. In order to elucidate the higher efficacy of these substances, in the present work, the influence of substituents on the cytoprotective phenothiazine core, an aromatic tricyclic amine, was analysed chemically and biologically. With regard to lipophilicity, radical stabilisation and solubility, novel substances based on phenothiazine were synthesized, which systematically differed in the three above-named parameters. This was achieved by substitution of different fatty acid chains, of solubility-influencing functional groups, or by the anellation of aromatic rings. According to tests of antioxidative capacity, cell survival, lipid peroxidation and protein oxidation, the novel derivatives exhibited a significant increase in antioxidative and cytoprotective activity. This enhanced efficacy correlated with increased stability of the corresponding radicals and raised lipophilicity up to a threshold of logP~7. Benzoanellated phenothiazines demonstrated cytoprotection EC50-values of 8-10 nM in oxidatively challenged, clonal hippocampal neurons (HT-22). This value represents a 20-fold improvement of the half-maximal effective concentration (EC50) compared to α-tocopherol, the most potent natural cytoprotective antioxidant. A comparison with the parent phenothiazine demonstrated a superiority of novel antioxidants of factor 4 in EC50 values. Hence, it is particularly aspects of solubility and distribution which limit the potency of current antioxidants, as well as aspects of radical stabilisation, which influence primary efficacy. In the future, these results might help in the design of more potent antioxidants, especially when long-range administration in neurodegenerative diseases is attempted.131 S

Fluphenazine dihydro­chloride dimethanol solvate

In the title compound {systematic name: 1-(2-hy­droxy­eth­yl)-4-[3-(2-trifluoro­methyl-10H-phenothia­zin-10-yl)prop­yl]piperazine-1,4-diium dichloride dimethanol disolvate}, C22H28F3N3OS2+·2Cl−·2CH3OH, the dihedral angle between the planes of the two outer benzene rings of the tricyclic phenothia­zine system is 46.91 (13)°. The piperazine ring adopts a chair conformation. The crystal structure is stabilized by O—H⋯Cl, N—H⋯Cl, C—H⋯O, C—H⋯Cl and C—H⋯F hydrogen bonds and contacts

Drug-coated balloons for small coronary artery disease in patients with chronic kidney disease: a pre-specified analysis of the BASKET-SMALL 2 trial

Background Data on the safety and efcacy of drug-coated balloon (DCB) compared to drug-eluting stent (DES) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are scarce, particularly at long term. This pre-specifed analysis aimed to investigate the 3-year efcacy and safety of DCB versus DES for small coronary artery disease (<3 mm) according to renal function at baseline. Methods BASKET-SMALL-2 was a large multi-center, randomized, controlled trial that tested the efcacy and safety of DCBs (n=382) against DESs (n=376) in small vessel disease. CKD was defned as eGFR<60 ml/min/1.73m2 . The primary endpoint was the composite of cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization (MACE) during 3 years. Results A total of 174/758 (23%) patients had CKD, out of which 91 were randomized to DCB and 83 to DES implantation. The primary efcacy outcome during 3 years was similar in both, DCB and DES patients (HR 0.98; 95%-CI 0.67–1.44; p=0.937) and patients with and without CKD (HR 1.18; 95%-CI 0.76–1.83; p=0.462), respectively. Rates of cardiac death and all-cause death were signifcantly higher among patients with CKD but not afected by treatment with DCB or DES. Major bleeding events were lower in the DCB when compared to the DES group (12 vs. 3, HR 0.26; 95%-CI 0.07–0.92; p=0.037) and not infuenced by presence of CKD. Conclusions The long-term efcacy and safety of DCB was similar in patients with and without CKD. The use of DCB was associated with signifcantly fewer major bleeding events (NCT 01574534)

Results from the “Me & My Heart” (eMocial) Study: a Randomized Evaluation of a New Smartphone-Based Support Tool to Increase Therapy Adherence of Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

Purpose: This study evaluated whether patient support, administered via an electronic device-based app, increased adherence to treatment and lifestyle changes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treated with ticagrelor in routine clinical practice. Methods: Patients (aged >= 18 years) with diagnosed ACS treated with ticagrelor co-administered with low-dose acetylsalicylic acid were randomized into an active group (with support tool app for medication intake reminders and motivational messages) and a control group (without support tool app), and observed for 48 weeks (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02615704). Patients were asked to complete the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Lifestyle Changes Questionnaire (LSQ), and were assessed for blood pressure and body mass index (BMI) at baseline (visit 1) and at the end of the study (visit 2). Medication adherence was measured using the Brilique Adherence Questionnaire (BAQ). Results: Patients (N = 676) were randomized to an active (n = 342) or a control (n = 334) group. BAQ data were available for 174 patients in the active group and 174 patients in the control group. Over the 48-week period, mean (standard deviation) adherence for the active and control groups was 96.4% (13.2%) and 91.5% (23.1%), respectively (effect of app intervention, p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in blood pressure and BMI between visits. General improvements in SF-36 and LSQ scores were observed for both groups. Conclusion: The patient support tool app was associated with significant improvements in patient-reported treatment adherence compared with a data collection app alone in patients prescribed ticagrelor for ACS

Impact of Insulin-Treated Compared to Non-Insulin-Treated Diabetes Mellitus on Outcome of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Drug-Coated Balloons versus Drug-Eluting Stents in De Novo Coronary Artery Disease: The Randomized BASKET-SMALL 2 Trial

Background: We evaluated the outcome of PCI of de novo stenosis with drug-coated balloons (DCB) versus drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with insulin-treated diabetes mellitus (ITDM) versus non-insulin-treated diabetes mellitus (NITDM). Methods: Patients were randomized in the BASKET-SMALL 2 trial to DCB or DES and followed over 3 years for MACE (cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction [MI], and target vessel revascularization [TVR]). Outcome in the diabetic subgroup (n = 252) was analyzed with respect to ITDM or NITDM. Results: In NITDM patients (n = 157), rates of MACE (16.7% vs. 21.9%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29–1.58, p = 0.37), death, non-fatal MI, and TVR (8.4% vs. 14.5%, HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.09–1.03, p = 0.057) were similar between DCB and DES. In ITDM patients (n = 95), rates of MACE (DCB 23.4% vs. DES 22.7%, HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.46–2.74, p = 0.81), death, non-fatal MI, and TVR (10.1% vs. 15.7%, HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.18–2.27, p = 0.49) were similar between DCB and DES. TVR was significantly lower with DCB versus DES in all diabetic patients (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.18–0.95, p = 0.038). Conclusions: DCB compared to DES for treatment of de novo coronary lesions in diabetic patients was associated with similar rates of MACE and numerically lower need for TVR both for ITDM and NITDM patients

Drug-coated balloons for small coronary artery disease (BASKET-SMALL 2): an open-label randomised non-inferiority trial

Drug-coated balloons (DCB) are a novel therapeutic strategy for small native coronary artery disease. However, their safety and efficacy is poorly defined in comparison with drug-eluting stents (DES).; BASKET-SMALL 2 was a multicentre, open-label, randomised non-inferiority trial. 758 patients with de-novo lesions (&lt;3 mm in diameter) in coronary vessels and an indication for percutaneous coronary intervention were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive angioplasty with DCB versus implantation of a second-generation DES after successful predilatation via an interactive internet-based response system. Dual antiplatelet therapy was given according to current guidelines. The primary objective was to show non-inferiority of DCB versus DES regarding major adverse cardiac events (MACE; ie, cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularisation) after 12 months. The non-inferiority margin was an absolute difference of 4% in MACE. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01574534.; Between April 10, 2012, and February 1, 2017, 382 patients were randomly assigned to the DCB group and 376 to DES group. Non-inferiority of DCB versus DES was shown because the 95% CI of the absolute difference in MACE in the per-protocol population was below the predefined margin (-3·83 to 3·93%, p=0·0217). After 12 months, the proportions of MACE were similar in both groups of the full-analysis population (MACE was 7·5% for the DCB group vs 7·3% for the DES group; hazard ratio [HR] 0·97 [95% CI 0·58-1·64], p=0·9180). There were five (1·3%) cardiac-related deaths in the DES group and 12 (3·1%) in the DCB group (full analysis population). Probable or definite stent thrombosis (three [0·8%] in the DCB group vs four [1·1%] in the DES group; HR 0·73 [0·16-3·26]) and major bleeding (four [1·1%] in the DCB group vs nine [2·4%] in the DES group; HR 0·45 [0·14-1·46]) were the most common adverse events.; In small native coronary artery disease, DCB was non-inferior to DES regarding MACE up to 12 months, with similar event rates for both treatment groups.; Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Basel Cardiovascular Research Foundation, and B Braun Medical AG

Venice Chart International Consensus Document on Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: 2011 Update

Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/93647/1/j.1540-8167.2012.02381.x.pd

Effect of sitagliptin on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND: Data are lacking on the long-term effect on cardiovascular events of adding sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor, to usual care in patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind study, we assigned 14,671 patients to add either sitagliptin or placebo to their existing therapy. Open-label use of antihyperglycemic therapy was encouraged as required, aimed at reaching individually appropriate glycemic targets in all patients. To determine whether sitagliptin was noninferior to placebo, we used a relative risk of 1.3 as the marginal upper boundary. The primary cardiovascular outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or hospitalization for unstable angina. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 3.0 years, there was a small difference in glycated hemoglobin levels (least-squares mean difference for sitagliptin vs. placebo, -0.29 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.32 to -0.27). Overall, the primary outcome occurred in 839 patients in the sitagliptin group (11.4%; 4.06 per 100 person-years) and 851 patients in the placebo group (11.6%; 4.17 per 100 person-years). Sitagliptin was noninferior to placebo for the primary composite cardiovascular outcome (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.09; P<0.001). Rates of hospitalization for heart failure did not differ between the two groups (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.20; P = 0.98). There were no significant between-group differences in rates of acute pancreatitis (P = 0.07) or pancreatic cancer (P = 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease, adding sitagliptin to usual care did not appear to increase the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, hospitalization for heart failure, or other adverse events