177 research outputs found
Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP): a new device for fast evaluation of liver fat?
International audienc
The effects of vasopressin and its analogues on the liver and its disorders in the critically ill:
Purpose of review: Vasopressin and terlipressin, a long-acting V1a analogue, are increasingly used in intensive care. The main clinical indications are the treatment of patients with septic shock and of patients with cirrhosis, who develop variceal bleeding, the hepatorenal syndrome or both. In this review, we summarize the effects of these drugs on splanchnic hemodynamics and organ function.Recent findings: A recent systematic meta-analysis of randomized trials suggests that terlipressin may improve renal function in hepatorenal syndrome and thereby reduce mortality by 34%. Moreover, a recent study reported that association of terlipressin and albumin was more effective than terlipressin alone. In patients with variceal bleeding, the bleeding control is significantly improved by early administration of terlipressin. The place of vasopressin in the treatment of patients with septic shock is still discussed, but compared with norepinephrine, vasopressin showed at least an equal efficacy. Summary: The use of vasopressin and its synthetic analogues has shown beneficial effects in the management of patients with cirrhosis, especially in the context of variceal bleeding, the hepatorenal syndrome or both. In both cases, the use of terlipressin improved survival. Therefore, in these clinical indications, terlipressin is a part of recommendations. The role of vasopressin in patients with septic shock remains to be precisely evaluated
Comparaison de la valeur diagnostique de la Vidéo-Capsule oesophagienne (VCO) et de la Fibroscopie Oeso-Gastro-Duodénale (FOGD) dans le dépistage des varices oesophagiennes (VO) chez les patients atteints de cirrhose – Etude d’équivalence prospective
This file is the study draft of the following reference: Sacher-Huvelin S, Cales P, Bureau C, Valla D, Vinel JP, Duburque C, Attar A, et al. Screening of esophageal varices by esophageal capsule endoscopy: results of a French multicenter prospective study. Endoscopy 2015;47:486-49
Actualités sur les co-infections VIH–VHC
Objectives
To evaluate the incidence of HIV–HCV co-infections and analyse the outcome in co-infected patients.
Epidemiology. Effects of antivirals
The prevalence of the co-infection by the HCV thus varies from 10 to 14% on subjects who have sexual behaviors at risk at 80 or 90% on users of drug IV. Numerous studies showed that the infection by the HIV made worse the natural history of the infection by the HCV [J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 6 1993 602–610; J Hepatol 28 1998 945–950]. On the other hand, the studies which endeavoured to appreciate the effect of the antiretroviral therapeutics on the natural history of the chronic hepatitis C, on the co-infected patients, are more discussed. In cohorts of big size, it was demonstrated that the hepatic mortality increased with the exposure to antiretrovirals. However, the duration of the antiretroviral treatment also reports the more important survival of the patients, which distorts credibly the figures. The effect of the infection by the HCV on the progress of the disease with HIV is more discussed. The patients infected by the HIV, in any case, have to benefit from the research for a co-infection by the viruses of hepatitis B and C (HBV and HCV). This screening must be renewed every year, in particular on the drug addicts patients or presenting behaviors at risk.
Viral replication
The research of a viral replication, must be implemented for any confirmed positive HCV serology. The research of the HCV RNA needs ultrasensitive techniques of molecular biology which allow a qualitative detection andor a quantification of the viral genome (viral load). The techniques of last generation of real-time PCR combine both approaches (detection and quantification). The viral load HCV is not correlated to the degree of hepatic disease and does not predict the severity of the hepatic disease, contrary to the correlation demonstrated in the infection by the HIV. On the other hand, it can be a predictive factor in the response to the treatment. The pretherapeutic check-up also includes a determination of the viral genotype because a strong involvement in the response to the treatment was clearly demonstrated.
Hepatic fibrosis
The hepatic fibrosis must be estimated on patients having a chronic hepatitis because it conditions the prognosis and the treatment of the hepatitis. The anatomopathological study after hepatic biopsy (DHB) remains the reference method. Recently, the development of non invasive methods of measure of the hepatic fibrosis improved the care of hepatitis C, notably the blood tests (fibrotest BioPredictive Paris, fibrometer BLS Angers) and physical measures as the impulsional elastometry (Fibroscan® Echosens) which substitutes more and more in practice to the draining hepatic biopsy.
Treatment
Numerous studies now validated the treatment associating interferon pegilated and ribavirine as the reference treatment on the co-infected patients HIV/HCV. This treatment involves a high virological response going from 14 to 36% in the patients infected by a genotype 1 and 2 and from 43 to 73% in the patients infected by a genotype 2 or 3. The duration of the treatment is 48 weeks. As well as usual virological factors on the mono-infected patients (genotype, viral load), the rate of CD4 is one of the best predictive factors with a good response. Many hopes go towards the new molecules in development (inhibitors of protease), inhibitors of polymerase), with promising results on the mono-infected patients. However, the toxicity of these molecules is not very well known at the moment in the co-infected patients. It is thus necessary to perform trials in this group of patient, by watching very carefully the toxicity of the therapeutic associations
Cirrhosis Diagnosis and Liver Fibrosis Staging: Transient Elastometry Versus Cirrhosis Blood Test.
INTRODUCTION: Elastometry is more accurate than blood tests for cirrhosis diagnosis. However, blood tests were developed for significant fibrosis, with the exception of CirrhoMeter developed for cirrhosis. We compared the performance of Fibroscan and CirrhoMeter, and classic binary cirrhosis diagnosis versus new fibrosis staging for cirrhosis diagnosis.
METHODS: The diagnostic population included 679 patients with hepatitis C and liver biopsy (Metavir staging and morphometry), Fibroscan, and CirrhoMeter. The prognostic population included 1110 patients with chronic liver disease and both tests.
RESULTS: Binary diagnosis: AUROCs for cirrhosis were: Fibroscan: 0.905; CirrhoMeter: 0.857; and P=0.041. Accuracy (Youden cutoff) was: Fibroscan: 85.4%; CirrhoMeter: 79.2%; and P<0.001. Fibrosis classification provided 6 classes (F0/1, F1/2, F2±1, F3±1, F3/4, and F4). Accuracy was: Fibroscan: 88.2%; CirrhoMeter: 88.8%; and P=0.77. A simplified fibrosis classification comprised 3 categories: discrete (F1±1), moderate (F2±1), and severe (F3/4) fibrosis. Using this simplified classification, CirrhoMeter predicted survival better than Fibroscan (respectively, χ=37.9 and 19.7 by log-rank test), but both predicted it well (P<0.001 by log-rank test). Comparison: binary diagnosis versus fibrosis classification, respectively, overall accuracy: CirrhoMeter: 79.2% versus 88.8% (P<0.001); Fibroscan: 85.4% versus 88.2% (P=0.127); positive predictive value for cirrhosis by Fibroscan: Youden cutoff (11.1 kPa): 49.1% versus cutoffs of F3/4 (17.6 kPa): 67.6% and F4 classes (25.7 kPa): 82.4%.
CONCLUSIONS: Fibroscan\u27s usual binary cutoffs for cirrhosis diagnosis are not sufficiently accurate. Fibrosis classification should be preferred over binary diagnosis. A cirrhosis-specific blood test markedly attenuates the accuracy deficit for cirrhosis diagnosis of usual blood tests versus transient elastometry, and may offer better prognostication
- …
