39 research outputs found

    Safety, Adherence and Acceptability of Intermittent Tenofovir/Emtricitabine as HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) among HIV-Uninfected Ugandan Volunteers Living in HIV-Serodiscordant Relationships: A Randomized, Clinical Trial

    Get PDF
    Background: Efficacy of oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in prevention of HIV acquisition has been evaluated using a daily regimen. However, adherence to long term daily medication is rarely perfect. Intermittent regimen may be a feasible alternative. Preclinical studies have demonstrated effectiveness of intermittent PrEP in SHIV prevention among animals. However, little is known about intermittent PrEP regimens. Design: Seventy two HIV-uninfected volunteers in HIV serodiscordant couple relationships in Uganda were randomly assigned to receive daily oral Tenofovir/Emtricitabine (TDF/FTC-Truvada) or placebo, or intermittent (Monday, Friday and within 2 hours after sex, not to exceed one dose per day) oral TDF/FTC or placebo in a 2:1:2:1 ratio. Volunteers and study staff were blinded to drug assignment, but not to regimen assignment. Methods: Volunteers were followed for 4 months after randomization, with monthly clinical and laboratory safety assessments and comprehensive HIV risk reduction services. Adherence was monitored using medication event monitoring system (MEMS) and self-report. Sexual activity data were collected via daily short text message (SMS) and self-report. HIV-specific immune responses were assessed by IFN-γ ELISPOT. Results: Both daily and intermittent oral TDF/FTC regimens were well tolerated. Median MEMS adherence rates were 98% (IQR: 93-100) for daily PrEP regimen, 91% (IQR: 73-97) for fixed intermittent dosing and 45% (IQR: 20-63) for post-coital dosing. SMS response rate was 74%, but increased to 80% after excluding server outages; results may have been affected by the novelty of this measure. The majority of volunteers expressed willingness with no particular preference for either regimen. Conclusions: Both daily and intermittent oral PrEP dosing regimens were safe. Adherence was high for daily and fixed intermittent dosing; post-coital dosing was associated with poor adherence. Fixed intermittent PrEP regimens may be feasible especially if a minimum effective drug concentration correlating with HIV prevention can be achieved with this dosing. Registration Clinicaltrials.gov number NCT0093134

    Failure of A Novel, Rapid Antigen and Antibody Combination Test to Detect Antigen-Positive HIV Infection in African Adults with Early HIV Infection

    Get PDF
    BACKGROUND: Acute HIV infection (prior to antibody seroconversion) represents a high-risk window for HIV transmission. Development of a test to detect acute infection at the point-of-care is urgent. METHODS: Volunteers enrolled in a prospective study of HIV incidence in four African cities, Kigali in Rwanda and Ndola, Kitwe and Lusaka in Zambia, were tested regularly for HIV by rapid antibody test and p24 antigen ELISA. Five subgroups of samples were also tested by the Determine Ag/Ab Combo test 1) Antigen positive, antibody negative (acute infection); 2) Antigen positive, antibody positive; 3) Antigen negative, antibody positive; 4) Antigen negative, antibody negative; and 5) Antigen false positive, antibody negative (HIV uninfected). A sixth group included serial dilutions from a p24 antigen-positive control sample. Combo test results were reported as antigen positive, antibody positive, or both. RESULTS: Of 34 group 1 samples with VL between 5x105 and >1.5x107 copies/mL (median 3.5x106), 1 (2.9%) was detected by the Combo antigen component, 7 (20.6%) others were positive by the Combo antibody component. No group 2 samples were antigen positive by the Combo test (0/18). Sensitivity of the Combo antigen test was therefore 1.9% (1/52, 95% CI 0.0, 9.9). One false positive Combo antibody result (1/30, 3.3%) was observed in group 4. No false-positive Combo antigen results were observed. The Combo antigen test was positive in group 6 at concentrations of 80 pg/mL, faintly positive at 40 and 20 pg/mL, and negative thereafter. The p24 ELISA antigen test remained positive at 5 pg/mL. CONCLUSIONS: Although the antibody component of the Combo test detected antibodies to HIV earlier than the comparison antibody tests used, less than 2% of the cases of antigen-positive HIV infection were detected by the Combo antigen component. The development of a rapid point-of-care test to diagnose acute HIV infection remains an urgent goal

    Control of the HIV-1 Load Varies by Viral Subtype in a Large Cohort of African Adults With Incident HIV-1 Infection.

    Get PDF
    Few human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected persons can maintain low viral levels without therapeutic intervention. We evaluate predictors of spontaneous control of the viral load (hereafter, "viral control") in a prospective cohort of African adults shortly after HIV infection. Viral control was defined as ≥2 consecutively measured viral loads (VLs) of ≤10 000 copies/mL after the estimated date of infection, followed by at least 4 subsequent measurements for which the VL in at least 75% was ≤10 000 copies/mL in the absence of ART. Multivariable logistic regression characterized predictors of viral control. Of 590 eligible volunteers, 107 (18.1%) experienced viral control, of whom 25 (4.2%) maintained a VL of 51-2000 copies/mL, and 5 (0.8%) sustained a VL of ≤50 copies/mL. The median ART-free follow-up time was 3.3 years (range, 0.3-9.7 years). Factors independently associated with control were HIV-1 subtype A (reference, subtype C; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.1 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.3-3.5]), female sex (reference, male sex; aOR, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.1-2.8]), and having HLA class I variant allele B*57 (reference, not having this allele; aOR, 1.9 [95% CI, 1.0-3.6]) in a multivariable model that also controlled for age at the time of infection and baseline CD4+ T-cell count. We observed strong associations between infecting HIV-1 subtype, HLA type, and sex on viral control in this cohort. HIV-1 subtype is important to consider when testing and designing new therapeutic and prevention technologies, including vaccines

    Cohort Profile: IAVI's HIV epidemiology and early infection cohort studies in Africa to support vaccine discovery.

    Get PDF
    In 2003, IAVI (formerly the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative) identified several gaps in HIV epidemiology and vaccine research. IAVI launched cohort studies to better understand at-risk populations, their suitability for clinical trial participation and their unmet needs for preventive services and products. Our goals included (i) improving our understanding of HIV incidence and volunteer retention among ‘key populations’ of at-risk persons suitable for participation in large-scale HIV prevention trials; (ii) identifying and addressing unmet needs for health care, counselling and prevention among these key populations; (iii) understanding host–virus interactions both shortly after virus acquisition and longer term; (iv) generating data and reagents from recently transmitted HIV to support new vaccine product discovery; and (v) understanding clinical outcomes of HIV disease in the African context to define clinical trial endpoints where antiretroviral therapy (ART) was not (yet) widely available, while building the clinical, laboratory and quality systems to support future trials. To this end, starting in 2004, IAVI established partnerships with nine experienced clinical research centres in east and southern Africa to enrol suitable volunteers (Figure 1). This manuscript includes data from two broad protocols that followed persons at risk of HIV acquisition (1) ‘A prospective, open cohort, observational feasibility study to determine HIV incidence in preparation for future preventive HIV vaccine clinical trials’ (IAVI Protocol B) and (2) ‘Heterosexual transmission of HIV in Africa’ [Emory Heterosexual Transmission (HT) study]. Between 2005 and 2009, varying by research centre, through to December 2011, they served as the source populations for a third cohort study on the natural history of HIV infection, ‘A prospective, observational, multi-center study to evaluate laboratory, clinical, immunologic and viral markers of disease progression in recently HIV-infected volunteers’ (IAVI Protocol C). Table 1 summarizes the start and stop dates for each site and each cohort. As part of participating in each respective cohort study, clinical and laboratory teams were trained in good clinical practices and good clinical laboratory practices, laboratories were accredited, and all assays were standardized and conducted under an external quality control programme.1 Study teams met annually, typically in Africa, to share experiences and results and for additional training

    Safety and broad immunogenicity of HIVconsvX conserved mosaic candidate T-cell vaccines vectored by ChAdOx1 and MVA in HIV-CORE 006: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 1 trial in healthy adults living without HIV-1 in eastern and southern Africa

    Full text link
    Background: Even within the context of antiretroviral treatment and prevention, an HIV-1 vaccine remains the best strategy for ending the HIV/AIDS epidemic. A vaccine is particularly needed in sub-Saharan Africa, where HIV-1 greatly affects people's lives and economy. Here, we aimed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of candidate T-cell vaccines in African populations. Methods: HIV-CORE 006 was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 1 trial conducted across four clinical research centres in Uganda, Kenya, and Zambia. Eligible participants were not pregnant, were living without HIV-1 or HIV-2, had a low likelihood of acquiring HIV-1, were aged 18–50 years, fully comprehended the purpose and details of this study as outlined in the participant information sheet, and passed an assessment of understanding before providing written informed consent. Participants were randomly assigned (9:2) to receive either a vaccine regimen or a placebo. The vaccine was administered as ChAdOx1.tHIVconsv1 (C1) followed by MVA.tHIVconsv3 (M3) and MVA.tHIVconsv4 (M4) in regimen C1-M3M4. The first primary outcome was the vaccines’ safety assessment, assessed in all participants who received at least one vaccine or placebo dose. The second primary outcome evaluated the C1-M3M4 regimen's induction of HIVconsvX-specific T-cell responses by assessing the proportion of vaccine recipients who responded to the vaccination, assessed in all participants who received all doses of vaccine or placebo as per protocol. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04553016, and the Pan-African Clinical Trials Registry PACTR202006495409011, and is now closed. Findings: Between July 15, 2021, and Nov 2, 2022, 89 healthy adults living without HIV-1 were randomly assigned, with 88 receiving either the vaccine (n=72) or placebo (n=16). Of these 88 participants, 57 (65%) were male and 31 (35%) were female. The C1, M3, and M4 vaccine components were well tolerated and induced HIVconsvX-specific responses in 70 (99%) of the 71 participants who completed all vaccine doses. Vaccine-elicited T cells peaked at a median of 2310 (IQR 1080–4480) IFN-γ spot-forming units per 106 peripheral blood mononuclear cells and recognised a median of eight (five to ten) of ten peptide pools spanning the HIVconsvX immunogen. The total frequencies of elicited T cells decreased 4·6 times over a 40-week follow-up period compared with the peak responses. Upon antigenic re-exposure, T cells proliferated, exhibited multiple effector functions, and inhibited HIV-1 representatives from clades A, B, C, and D. Interpretation: Results from key sub-Saharan African populations supported the safety of the vaccine regimen previously shown in the first-in-human trial in the UK. The induction of T cells and their characteristics encourage vaccine integration into HIV-1 cure strategies, which could inform HIV-1 prevention efforts. Funding: The European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership

    Examining oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) literacy among participants in an HIV vaccine trial preparedness cohort study

    Get PDF
    Background: PrEP literacy is influenced by many factors including the types of information available and how it is interpreted. The level of PrEP literacy may influence acceptability and uptake. Methods: We conducted 25 in-depth interviews in a HIV vaccine trial preparedness cohort study. We explored what participants knew about PrEP, sources of PrEP knowledge and how much they know about PrEP. We used the framework approach to generate themes for analysis guided by the Social Ecological Model and examined levels of PrEP literacy using the individual and interpersonal constructs of the SEM. Results: We found that PrEP awareness is strongly influenced by external factors such as social media and how much participants know about HIV treatment and prevention in the local community. However, while participants highlighted the importance of the internet/social media as a source of information about PrEP they talked of low PrEP literacy in their communities. Participants indicated that their own knowledge came as a result of joining the HIV vaccine trial preparedness study. However, some expressed doubts about the effectiveness of the drug and worried about side effects. Participants commented that at the community level PrEP was associated with being sexually active, because it was used to prevent the sexual transmission of HIV. As a result, some participants commented that one could feel judged by the health workers for asking for PrEP at health facilities in the community. Conclusion: The information collected in this study provided an understanding of the different layers of influence around individuals that are important to address to improve PrEP acceptability and uptake. Our findings can inform strategies to address the barriers to PrEP uptake, particularly at structural and community levels. Trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT0406688

    Strengthening laboratory capacity for HIV vaccine clinical trials and epidemiological studies in Eastern and Southern Africa

    No full text
    Background: Conducting successful HIV vaccine clinical trials in resource-limited settings is hampered by lack of adequate laboratory capacity at trial sites, poor infrastructure, lack of well-trained technical personnel, and inadequate laboratory quality management Systems. We describe our approach to establishing sustainable laboratory capacity for clinical trials in Africa. Methods: IAVI identified 9 CRCs where a capacity building program that supports immunology and clinical testing was established. Information from the 9 CRCs was collected retrospectively and compiled in Microsoft excel for descriptive statistics. Mapping was done in Quantum Geographic information system. Results: Newly built and refurbished laboratories have been equipped with the required testing laboratory equipment. All CRC laboratories (n=10, 100%) received Good Clinical Laboratory Practice (GCLP) accreditation between 2004 and 2016, and accreditation maintained annually. A total of 89 audits were done between 2005-2019. KAVI and KEMRI had the highest number of audits (n=11, 12.4%). IAVI successfully trained a total of 1811 individual, of which (n=1130, 62.7%) trained on GCLP, (n=330, 18.3%) Quality Management Systems, (n=311, 17,2%) laboratory techniques and (n=32,1.8%) between 2004 and 2021. All the 13 Assays were registered in either College of American pathologist (CAP) or Royal college of pathologists of Australasia (RCPA) for Proficiency testing. Conclusion: The establishment of GCLP accredited laboratories and well-trained personnel has created centers of excellence and it has enabled them to attract independent competitive research funding. The GCLP accreditation and standardized testing procedures ensured reliable and accurate data, especially important for multi-country and multi-center studies.</ns4:p

    Identifying at-risk populations in Kenya and South Africa: HIV incidence in cohorts of men who report sex with men, sex workers, and youth.

    No full text
    Objective To identify and describe populations at risk for HIV in 3 clinical research centers in Kenya and South Africa. Design Prospective cohort study Methods Volunteers reporting recent sexual activity, multiple partners, transactional sex, sex with an HIV-positive partner, or, if male, sex with men (MSM; in Kenya only) were enrolled. Sexually active minors were enrolled in South Africa only. Risk behavior, HIV testing, and clinical data were obtained at follow-up visits. Results From 2005 to 2008, 3023 volunteers were screened, 2113 enrolled, and 1834 contributed data on HIV incidence. MSM had the highest HIV incidence rate of 6.8 cases per 100 person-years [95% confidence interval (CI): 4.9 to 9.2] followed by women in Kilifiand Cape Town (2.7 cases per 100 person-years, 95% CI: 1.7 to 4.2). No seroconversions were observed in Nairobi women or men in Nairobi or Cape Town who were not MSM. In 327 MSM, predictors of HIV acquisition included report of genital ulcer (Hazard Ratio: 4.5, 95% CI: 1.7 to 11.6), not completing secondary school education (HR: 3.4, 95% CI: 1.6 to 7.2) and reporting receptive anal intercourse (HR: 8.2, 95% CI: 2.7 to 25.0). Paying for sex was inversely associated with HIV infection(HR:0.2,95%CI:0.04to0.8).279(13.0%) volunteers did not return after the first visit; subsequent attrition rates ranged from 10.4 to 21.8 volunteers per 100 person-years across clinical research centers. Conclusions Finding, enrolling, and retaining risk populations for HIV prevention trials is challenging in Africa. African MSM are not frequently engaged for research, have high HIV incidence, need urgent risk reduction counseling, and may represent a suitable population for future HIV prevention trials
    corecore