Treatment of women with heavy menstrual bleeding:Results of a prospective cohort study alongside a randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the reintervention rate of women who opted for treatment with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) to women who opted for endometrial ablation. Furthermore, the difference in reintervention rate between women in this observational cohort and women who were randomised was compared, with the hypothesis that women who actively decide on treatment have lower reintervention rates compared to women in a RCT. STUDY DESIGN: An observational cohort study alongside a multicentre randomised controlled trial (RCT) was conducted between April 2012 and January 2016, with a follow-up time of 24 months, in 26 hospitals and nearby general practices in the Netherlands. Women suffering from heavy menstrual bleeding, aged 34 years and older, without intracavitary pathology and without a future fertility desire, were eligible for this trial. Women who declined randomisation were asked to participate in the observational cohort. The outcome measure was reintervention rate at 24 months of follow-up. RESULTS: 276 women were followed in the observational cohort of which 87 women preferred an initial treatment with LNG-IUS and 189 women preferred an initial treatment with endometrial ablation. At 24 months of follow-up women in the LNG-IUS-group were more likely to receive a reintervention compared to the women in the ablation group, 28/81 (35 %) versus 25/178 (14 %) (aRR 2.42, CI 1.47-3.98, p-value 0.001). No differences in reintervention rates were found between women in the observational cohort and women in the RCT. CONCLUSIONS: Women who receive an LNG-IUS are more likely to undergo an additional intervention compared to women who receive endometrial ablation. Reintervention rates of women in the cohort and RCT population were comparable. The results of this study endorse the findings of the RCT and will contribute to shared decision making in women with heavy menstrual bleeding

The effects of Saline Infusion Sonography on the histological quality of endometrial sampling in women with postmenopausal bleeding

Background: The aim of this study is to analyze the histopathological features of endometrial samples obtained by aspiration when performed before or after the saline contrast sonohysterography in women with postmenopausal bleeding and a thickened endometrium. Hypothetically, the saline infusion could disrupt the tissue and therefore affect the quality of the sample. Furthermore, we want to determine which histological features have impact on the quality of the endometrial sample. Methods: We performed a randomized controlled trial (ESPRESSO trial) in which we analyzed the aspiration samples in two groups. Women were allocated either to saline contrast sonohysterography and subsequent endometrial sampling (SCSH-Sampling group) or to the opposite order (Sampling-SCSH group). Dedicated gyneco-pathologists retrospectively assessed the specimens and recorded the type (blood, mucus, epithelium, intact glands, stroma and tissue context) and quantity (on a scale of 0–3) of material that was found in the specimens. Results: This analysis consisted of 197 samples, with 101 women in the SCSH-Sampling group and 96 women in the Sampling-SCSH group. No significant differences were found in the histological features between the two groups. All significant histological features differed significantly in the sufficient samples compared to the insufficient samples: higher amounts of blood, more endometrial epithelium, presence of intact endometrial glands, better stroma and tissue context. Oppositely, a significantly higher amount of mucus was found in the insufficient samples. Conclusion: This study shows that the histological features of the endometrial sample were not affected by the saline contrast sonohysterography, when performed prior to the tissue sampling. Trial registration ESPRESSO TRIAL, NTR5690, registered 16 February 2016, https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NTR5690

Single-layer vs double-layer uterine closure during cesarean delivery:3-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial (2Close study)

Background: The rising rate of cesarean deliveries has led to an increased incidence of long long-term complications, including niche formation in the uterine scar. Niche development is associated with various gynecologic complaints and complications in subsequent pregnancies, such as uterine rupture and placenta accreta spectrum disorders. Although uterine closure technique is considered a potential risk factor for niche development, consensus on the optimal technique remains elusive. Objective: We aimed to evaluate the effect of single-layer vs double-layer closure of the uterine incision on live birth rate at a 3-year follow-up with secondary objectives focusing on gynecologic, fertility, and obstetrical outcomes at the same follow-up. Study Design: A multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial was performed at 32 hospitals in the Netherlands. Women ≥18 years old undergoing a first cesarean delivery were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either single-layer or double-layer closure of the uterine incision. The primary outcome of the long-term follow-up was the live birth rate; with secondary outcomes, including pregnancy rate, the need for fertility treatment, mode of delivery, and obstetrical and gynecologic complications. This trial is registered on the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform www.who.int (NTR5480; trial finished). Results: Between 2016 and 2018, the 2Close study randomly assigned 2292 women, with 830 of 1144 and 818 of 1148 responding to the 3-year questionnaire in the single-layer and double-layer closure. No differences were observed in live birth rates; also there were no differences in pregnancy rate, need for fertility treatments, mode of delivery, or uterine ruptures in subsequent pregnancies. High rates of gynecologic symptoms, including spotting (30%–32%), dysmenorrhea (47%–49%), and sexual dysfunction (Female Sexual Function Index score, 23) are reported in both groups. Conclusion: The study did not demonstrate the superiority of double-layer closure over single-layer closure in terms of reproductive outcomes after a first cesarean delivery. This challenges the current recommendation favoring double-layer closure, and we propose that surgeons can choose their preferred technique. Furthermore, the high risk of gynecologic symptoms after a cesarean delivery should be discussed with patients.</p

Women’s preference for laparoscopic or abdominal hysterectomy

In the present study, women’s preferences on advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) and abdominal hysterectomy (AH) have been studied. Patients’ preferences were evaluated in individual, structured interviews in women scheduled for hysterectomy and questionnaires in nurses. Forty-three patients and 39 nurses were included. After general information, 84% of patients and 74% of nurses preferred LH over AH. This preference did not change after supplying more detailed information or after hysterectomy. The avoidance of complications was indicated as the most important factor in the decision. More than half of the women evaluated a difference of 1% as the maximum acceptable risk of major complications. When confronted with scenarios based on current evidence, both patients and nurses prefer LH over AH. This study supports further implementation of LH in clinical practice. The actual major complication rate in hysterectomy, however, is perceived as high

Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system versus endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding

Acknowledgments: We thank all the women who participated in this trial; the participating general practitioners, gynecologists, and hospitals; the research nurses; and the staff of the Dutch Consortium for Studies in Women’s Health and Reproduction.Peer reviewedPublisher PD

Diagnostic accuracy of frozen section diagnosis of the adnexal mass: a metaanalysis

Background. Frozen section diagnosis is a diagnostic procedure for the assessment of the adnexal mass during surgery. The purpose of the present study was to perform a systematic review of the literature on the accuracy of frozen section diagnosis in the assessment of the adnexal mass. Methods. We performed a computerized Medline and EMBASE search to identify all registered articles published between January 1966 and June 2003, comparing frozen section diagnosis of ovarian pathology to the final histopathological diagnosis. For each study, we calculated the prevalence of malignant and borderline tumors, and the sensitivity and specificity of the frozen section diagnosis using the final histopathological diagnosis as reference. We performed the calculations in two ways. In the first analysis, tumors that were found to be borderline were considered as malignant in the 2 x 2 table. In the second analysis, tumors that were found to be borderline were considered as benign in the 2 x 2 table. Results. Eighteen studies were included for analysis. When the diagnosis borderline was classified as malignant, the sensitivity of frozen section diagnosis varied between 65% and 97%, and the specificity between 97% and 100%. When the diagnosis borderline was considered to be benign, the sensitivity varied between 71% and 100%, for a specificity varying between 98.3% and 100%. Conclusion. The accuracy of frozen section diagnosis for the assessment of the ovarian mass is good, with acceptable sensitivities for almost perfect specificities. Future studies on patient preferences for the different outcomes as well as economic analysis are needed for definite position of this diagnostic technique. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserve