Enhancing participation in a national pedometer-based workplace intervention amongst staff at a Scottish university

Background: Physical inactivity is the fourth leading risk factor for global mortality. Increasing physical activity improves health, reduces the risk of multiple causes of chronic ill health and improves psychological wellbeing. Walking is an ideal way to meet physical activity guidelines, reduce sedentary behaviour, and improve health and wellbeing. Aim: To examine the effectiveness of a facilitated pedometer-based intervention to increase walking behaviour amongst staff at a Scottish university. Methods: 20 participants (4 men, 16 women) volunteered to take part in a national work-based step count challenge, which required them to wear a pedometer and record their steps for eight weeks. The intervention was enhanced by the use of additional techniques including encouragement, education, story sharing, goal setting and social support. Results: All participants significantly increased their step counts. Increases were particularly marked in the most physically inactive participants. Support staff recorded significantly more steps than academic staff. Conclusion: Pedometer-based interventions can be effective in increasing walking behaviour amongst university staff, particularly in physically inactive individuals. However, participation can be enhanced through the use of additional behaviour change techniques, such as goal setting and social support

Is there a demand for physical activity interventions provided by the health care sector? Findings from a population survey

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Health care providers in many countries have delivered interventions to improve physical activity levels among their patients. Thus far, less is known about the population's interest to increase their physical activity levels and their opinion about the health care provider's role in physical activity promotion. The aims of this paper were to investigate the self-reported physical activity levels of the population and intention to increase physical activity levels, self-perceived need for support, and opinions about the responsibilities of both individuals and health care providers to promote physical activity.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A regional public health survey was mailed to 13 440 adults (aged 18-84 years) living in Östergötland County (Sweden) in 2006. The survey was part of the regular effort by the regional Health Authorities.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>About 25% of the population was categorised as physically active, 38% as moderately active, 27% as somewhat active, and 11% as low active. More than one-third (37%) had no intentions to increase their physical activity levels, 36% had thought about change, while 27% were determined to change. Lower intention to change was mainly associated with increased age and lower education levels. 28% answered that physical activity was the most important health-related behaviour to change "right now" and 15% of those answered that they wanted or needed support to make this change. Of respondents who might be assumed to be in greatest need of increased activity (i.e. respondents reporting poor general health, BMI>30, and inactivity) more than one-quarter wanted support to make improvements to their health. About half of the respondents who wanted support to increase their physical activity levels listed health care providers as a primary source for support.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>These findings suggest that there is considerable need for physical activity interventions in this population. Adults feel great responsibility for their own physical activity levels, but also attribute responsibility for promoting increased physical activity to health care practitioners.</p

Let's make Scotland more active A strategy for physical activity

Includes bibliographical referencesAvailable from British Library Document Supply Centre- DSC:m03/18619 / BLDSC - British Library Document Supply CentreSIGLEGBUnited Kingdo

Socio-economic differences in cardiovascular disease and physical activity: stereotypes and reality

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is patterned by socio-economic status, being more common in lower social classes. Since physical inactivity is a risk factor for CVD it might be assumed that it is more common in tower social classes. We examine major recent UK population surveys and show that this assumption is incorrect; although higher social class adults engage in more formal sports activities, they are Less likely to engage in other (e.g. occupational) activities. Lower social class children are more likely to engage in sports and active play. We also show that although Scotland has higher rates of CVD than England, it does not have higher prevalences of all CVD risk factors

Tools to measure physical activity in medical practice

Health-care providers can play an important role in promoting weight loss among their overweight and obese patients by promoting regular physical activity. Regular physical activity, performed at moderate-to-vigorous intensities has substantial health benefits. Physical activity is effective in reducing the risks for complications of obesity, such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, insulin resistance, and diabetes. Regular physical activity is also associated with appetite suppression. The amount of physical activity recommended for promoting health and prevention of disease and early mortality by the Surgeon General's Report on Physical Activity and Health—150 kcal/d or 1000 kcal/wk—is equal to a 1.5-mile brisk walk (1). If the energy is not replaced, this accumulated energy expenditure is sufficient to prevent a weight gain and/or promote a weight loss of nearly 10 pounds a year

An evaluation of an obesity and weight management resource pack

Background: The prevention and treatment of overweight and obesity is a priority for all health professionals and requires resources that are regularly evaluated to ensure that they meet the needs of their target population. Dietitians in Obesity Management UK (DOM UK), a specialist group of the British Dietetic Association, commissioned an evaluation of their resources. These have been developed for use by Dietitians to determine the uptake and implementation of DOM UK resources in dietetic practice, as well as the opinions and suggestions of Dietitians concerning the resource pack. Methods: A random sample of 20% (n = 33) of the 165 Dietitians who had ordered resources were selected from the DOM UK database along with 20% of DOM UK members who had not (n = 38). Data were then collected using telephone-administered questionnaires. Results: Most of the Dietitians who used the resources favoured them because they improved their consultations and were liked by patients. Resources 'j' (controlling your portions) and 'k' (planning your meals) were most frequently used. However, the cost of the pack was a deterrent to both new and repeat orders. The evaluation also revealed that 17% of DOM UK members were unaware of these resources and 23% who ordered them were unaware that online samples were available. Conclusion: The evaluation showed that most Dietitians who used the resources found them very useful especially resources concerning meal planning and portion sizes. However, concerns about cost and the need for greater awareness about the resources among Dietitians were highlighte