Immunogenicity and safety of a multi-human dose formulation of Biological E’s 14-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide conjugate vaccine (PNEUBEVAX 14®) administered to 6–8-week-old healthy infants: a phase 3, single-blind, randomized, active-controlled study

BackgroundPneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) have considerably reduced the burden of invasive pneumococcal disease (PD) worldwide. Consequently, though, there has been an increase in non-vaccine serotype-induced PD particularly at both the extremes of age. Biological E has developed a 14-valent PCV (PNEUBEVAX 14®) that includes additional serotypes 22F and 33F. PNEUBEVAX 14® was shown to be safe, immunogenic, and non-inferior to Prevenar-13® (PCV-13) when administered to infants in a pivotal phase 3 trial. In this study, the multi-dose presentation of PNEUBEVAX 14® with 2-phenoxyethanol as a preservative was assessed for safety and immunogenicity in infants.MethodsThis was a phase 3, single-blind, randomized, active-controlled study in 6–8-week-old healthy infants, conducted at three sites across India. The safety and immunogenicity of multi-dose presentation of PNEUBEVAX 14® were assessed in a 6–10–14-week dosing schedule, with 300 infants randomized to receive either PNEUBEVAX 14® or PCV-13. Safety-wise solicited local reactions and systemic events, unsolicited adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and medically attended AEs (MAAEs) were recorded and analyzed. Immunogenicity was assessed by measuring anti-pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide (anti-PnCPS) immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies for all 14 serotypes, as well as cross-reactivity to serotype 6A.FindingsThe safety aspects of the multi-dose presentation of PNEUBEVAX 14® and PCV-13 were comparable with 23.3% of subjects having AEs in each of the two arms. There were no serious AEs, medically attended AEs, or deaths in either of the two study arms. Reported AEs were mild and solicited in nature, with injection site swelling and injection site pain being the most common AEs in both arms. The multi-dose presentation of PNEUBEVAX 14® was found to induce a robust immune response, including the new serotypes 22F and 33F. Importantly, PNEUBEVAX 14® also induced cross-reactive antibodies against serotype 6A.InterpretationThe multi-dose presentation of PNEUBEVAX 14® is both safe and immunogenic when administered to 6–8-week-old infants in a 6–10–14-week dosing schedule. These results extend the findings of a pivotal phase 3 study of the single-dose presentation of PNEUBEVAX 14® that showed that it was safe, robustly immunogenic, and non-inferior to PCV-13 in the same age group and dosing schedule. Taken together, these data suggest that both the single-dose and multi-dose presentations of PNEUBEVAX 14® can be safely administered to infants to prevent pneumococcal disease caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae.Clinical Trial Registrationhttps://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/pmaindet2.php?EncHid=NTk0MzA=&Enc=&userName=, identifier CTRI/2021/10/037067

A study on validity of C-reactive protein in deciding the duration of antibiotic therapy in suspected neonatal bacterial infection

Background: Neonatal septicemia is defined as generalized bacterial infection of newborns documented by positive blood culture in first four weeks of life. Objective of present study was to determine whether C-Reactive protein can be used as a parameter to identify the time point when antibiotic treatment can safely be discontinued in a defined major subgroup of neonates treated for suspected bacterial infection.Methods: A total of 50 neonates with birth weight more than 1500gms with suspected septicemia were enrolled in the prospective study. Serum CRP were determined 24-48 hours after the first dose of antibiotics. If CRP was less than 6mg/l, infants were considered unlikely to be infected and the antibiotic treatment was stopped. If CRP was more than 6mg/l, antibiotics were continued and CRP measured on alternative days in one subgroup (2a) and on seventh day in another subgroup (2b). CRP was the single decision criterion to stop the antibiotic therapy. Negative predictive value with respect to further treatment was determined.Results: Duration of antibiotic therapy could be reduced to less than seven days in 54% cases and &lt; 72 hours in 48% cases.Conclusions: Negative predictive value of serial CRP is 100% in deciding the duration of antibiotic therapy in suspected neonatal septicemia.</jats:p

Wolfram syndrome: a case report with severe polyuria and secondary urological abnormalities

Wolfram syndrome is the condition characterized by juvenile onset diabetes mellitus and optic atrophy, which is also known as DIDMOAD. Classical Wolfram syndrome is a rare autosomal recessive disorder caused by mutations in WFS1, a gene involved in endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondrial function. Patients present with type 1 diabetes mellitus followed by optic atrophy in the first decade, diabetes insipidus and sensorineural deafness in the second decade, dilated renal outflow tracts as early as in the third decade, and various neurological abnormalities in the early fourth decade. We describe a case report of 14-year-old male child diagnosed as wolfram syndrome with type 1 diabetes mellitus, diabetes insipidus, deafness, optic atrophy and severe urological abnormalities. Patients who present with early onset insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and optic atrophy together should be evaluated with respect to Wolfram Syndrome. If a patient, who is a known case of diabetes mellitus, presents with persistent polyuria or neurogenic bladder despite good glycemic control, suspicion of wolfram syndrome and further evaluation regarding the same must be made. Recognizing and timely management of this condition will help to improve the quality of life in the patient.</jats:p

Immunogenicity and safety of a novel MMR vaccine (live, freeze-dried) containing the Edmonston-Zagreb measles strain, the Hoshino mumps strain, and the RA 27/3 rubella strain: Results of a randomized, comparative, active controlled phase III clinical trial

This phase III clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of the single-dose and multi-dose formulations of a novel MMR vaccine (live, freeze-dried) developed by M/s Cadila Healthcare Limited, India (Cadila MMR vaccine), containing the Hoshino mumps strain, compared to that of an existing MMR vaccine (live, freeze-dried) developed by M/s Serum Institute of India Limited, India (Serum MMR vaccine). These two vaccines have similar measles and rubella strains, but different mumps strains (Hoshino in Cadila MMR vaccine, and L-Zagreb in Serum MMR vaccine). Three hundred and twenty-eight subjects of either sex, aged 15–18 months, were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either the Cadila or Serum MMR vaccine. Immunogenicity assessments (IgG antibodies against measles, mumps, and rubella viruses) were done at baseline and 42 d after vaccination. Solicited (local and systemic) and unsolicited adverse events were recorded for up to 42 d following vaccination. The Cadila MMR vaccine was found to be non-inferior to the Serum MMR vaccine in terms of end-of-study proportion of subjects seropositive for anti-measles antibodies (100.0% in both groups), anti-mumps antibodies (94.5% vs. 94.0%), and anti-rubella antibodies (95.5% vs. 91.0%). Both vaccines were well tolerated by all study participants; the most common adverse event reported in both groups was fever, followed by rash. The results of this phase III clinical trial show that the novel Cadila MMR vaccine is non-inferior to the Serum MMR vaccine

Unveiling Silent Consequences: Impact of Pulmonary Tuberculosis on Lung Health and Functional Wellbeing after Treatment

Background: Pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) remains a major public health issue in India, with high incidence and mortality. The current literature on post-TB sequelae functional defects focuses heavily on spirometry, with conflicting obstruction vs. restriction data, lacks advanced statistical analysis, and has insufficient data on diffusion limitation and functional impairment. Objective: This study aimed to thoroughly evaluate post-tubercular sequelae after treatment, assessing chest radiology, spirometry, diffusing capacity, and exercise capacity. Methods: A total of 85 patients were studied at a university teaching hospital in Mysuru. The data collected included characteristics, comorbidities, smoking history, and respiratory symptoms. The investigations included spirometry, DLCO, chest X-rays with scoring, and 6MWT. Results: Of the patients, 70% had abnormal X-rays post-treatment, correlating with reduced lung function. Additionally, 70% had impaired spirometry with obstructive/restrictive patterns, and 62.2% had reduced DLCO, with females at higher risk. Smoking increased the risk of sequelae. Conclusions: Most patients had residual radiological/lung function abnormalities post-treatment. Advanced analyses provide insights into obstructive vs. restrictive defects. Ongoing research should explore pathogenetic mechanisms and therapeutic modalities to minimize long-term post-TB disability

Baseline demography of randomized group (FAS).

BackgroundPentavalent vaccines (DTP-HepB-Hib) have been introduced in many countries in their routine public immunization programmes to protect against diphtheria (D), tetanus (T), pertussis (P), hepatitis B (Hep B) and Hemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) diseases. This study compared the safety and immunogenicity of a new formulation of a whole-cell Bordetella pertussis (wP) based pentavalent vaccine (DTwP-HepB-Hib). The new formulation was developed using well-characterized hepatitis B and pertussis whole cell vaccine components.MethodsThis was a phase III, observer-blind, randomized, non-inferiority, multi-center study conducted in India among 460 infants who were followed up for safety and immunogenicity for 28 days after administration of three doses of either investigational or licensed comparator formulations at 6–8, 10–12 and 14–16 weeks of age.ResultsThe investigational formulation of DTwP-HepB-Hib vaccine was non-inferior to the licensed formulation in terms of hepatitis B seroprotection rate (% of subjects with HepB antibodies ≥10mIU/mL were 99.1% versus 99.0%, respectively, corresponding to a difference of 0.1% (95% CI, -2.47 to 2.68)) and pertussis immune responses (adjusted geometric mean concentrations of antibodies for anti-PT were 76.7 EU/mL versus 63.3 EU/mL, with a ratio of aGMTs of 1.21 (95% CI, 0.89–1.64), and for anti-FIM were 1079 EU/mL versus 1129 EU/mL, with a ratio of aGMTs of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.73–1.24), respectively). The immune responses to other valences (D, T, and Hib) in the two formulations were also similar. The safety profile of both formulations was found to be similar and were well tolerated.ConclusionsThe investigational DTwP-HepB-Hib vaccine formulation was immunogenic and well-tolerated when administered as three dose primary series in infants.Clinical trial registrationClinical Trials Registry India number: CTRI/2018/12/016692.</div

S1 File -

BackgroundPentavalent vaccines (DTP-HepB-Hib) have been introduced in many countries in their routine public immunization programmes to protect against diphtheria (D), tetanus (T), pertussis (P), hepatitis B (Hep B) and Hemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) diseases. This study compared the safety and immunogenicity of a new formulation of a whole-cell Bordetella pertussis (wP) based pentavalent vaccine (DTwP-HepB-Hib). The new formulation was developed using well-characterized hepatitis B and pertussis whole cell vaccine components.MethodsThis was a phase III, observer-blind, randomized, non-inferiority, multi-center study conducted in India among 460 infants who were followed up for safety and immunogenicity for 28 days after administration of three doses of either investigational or licensed comparator formulations at 6–8, 10–12 and 14–16 weeks of age.ResultsThe investigational formulation of DTwP-HepB-Hib vaccine was non-inferior to the licensed formulation in terms of hepatitis B seroprotection rate (% of subjects with HepB antibodies ≥10mIU/mL were 99.1% versus 99.0%, respectively, corresponding to a difference of 0.1% (95% CI, -2.47 to 2.68)) and pertussis immune responses (adjusted geometric mean concentrations of antibodies for anti-PT were 76.7 EU/mL versus 63.3 EU/mL, with a ratio of aGMTs of 1.21 (95% CI, 0.89–1.64), and for anti-FIM were 1079 EU/mL versus 1129 EU/mL, with a ratio of aGMTs of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.73–1.24), respectively). The immune responses to other valences (D, T, and Hib) in the two formulations were also similar. The safety profile of both formulations was found to be similar and were well tolerated.ConclusionsThe investigational DTwP-HepB-Hib vaccine formulation was immunogenic and well-tolerated when administered as three dose primary series in infants.Clinical trial registrationClinical Trials Registry India number: CTRI/2018/12/016692.</div

Unsolicited AEs within 28 days after any vaccine injections, by system organ class and preferred term (safety analysis set).

Unsolicited AEs within 28 days after any vaccine injections, by system organ class and preferred term (safety analysis set).</p

Summary of geometric means—Pre-dose 1 and post-dose 3 (PPAS).

Summary of geometric means—Pre-dose 1 and post-dose 3 (PPAS).</p

Summary of seroprotection and seronconversion rates—Pre-dose 1 and post-dose 3 (PPAS).

Summary of seroprotection and seronconversion rates—Pre-dose 1 and post-dose 3 (PPAS).</p