CORE
COnnecting
REpositories
  • Services overviewExplore all CORE services
  • Access to raw data

    • API
    • Dataset
    • FastSync
  • Content discovery

    • Recommender
    • Discovery
  • OAI identifiers

    • OAI Resolver
  • Managing content

    • Dashboard
  • Bespoke contracts

    • Consultancy services
  • Support us

      MembershipSponsorshipResearch partnership
  • About

    • About us
    • Our mission
    • Team
    • Blog
    • FAQs
    • Contact us
  • Community governance

    • Governance
    • Advisory Board
    • Board of supporters
    • Research network
  • Innovations

    • Our research
    • Labs

    1 research outputs found

    The Role of the (Psychiatric) Expert in the Judicial Process

    Author
    1. Advisory Committee’s Note to Federal Rules of Evidence Rule 405
    2. AH Lubasch
    3. B See Richards
    4. CB Mueller
    5. DE Murray
    6. Discussed in Slovenko R
    7. DJ Steinbock
    8. GL See Wells
    9. IR See Freckelton
    10. J Simon
    11. J Weinstein
    12. J Weinstein
    13. J Weinstein
    14. JP Murphy
    15. K Menninger
    16. ME James
    17. ML Burton
    18. Quoted in Cooney JE
    19. R Slovenko
    20. RL Carlson
    21. RL Russell
    22. S Rep
    23. This is an actual case (reported by Dr. Hubert Miller to author Nov. 10, 1988). See Melton GB, Petrila J, Poythress NG
    24. V Mather
    Publication venue
    'Springer Science and Business Media LLC'
    Publication date
    01/01/1990
    Field of study
    No full text
    Crossref
    corecore

    CORE (COnnecting REpositories) is a not-for-profit service hosted by The Open University supported by CORE Members.

    Product
    • Services
    • Membership
    • Sponsorship
    • Labs
    Organisation
    • About us
    • Governance
    • Team
    • Data providers
    Support
    • Terms
    • FAQs
    • Blog
    • Contact us
    Writing about CORE?

    Discover our research outputs and cite our work.

    Follow us:
    COREAccessibilityCookiesPrivacy