TAC102 is a novel component of the mitochondrial genome segregation machinery in trypanosomes

Trypanosomes show an intriguing organization of their mitochondrial DNA into a catenated network, the kinetoplast DNA (kDNA). While more than 30 proteins involved in kDNA replication have been described, only few components of kDNA segregation machinery are currently known. Electron microscopy studies identified a high-order structure, the tripartite attachment complex (TAC), linking the basal body of the flagellum via the mitochondrial membranes to the kDNA. Here we describe TAC102, a novel core component of the TAC, which is essential for proper kDNA segregation during cell division. Loss of TAC102 leads to mitochondrial genome missegregation but has no impact on proper organelle biogenesis and segregation. The protein is present throughout the cell cycle and is assembled into the newly developing TAC only after the pro-basal body has matured indicating a hierarchy in the assembly process. Furthermore, we provide evidence that the TAC is replicated de novo rather than using a semi-conservative mechanism. Lastly, we demonstrate that TAC102 lacks an N-terminal mitochondrial targeting sequence and requires sequences in the C-terminal part of the protein for its proper localization

Native Variants of the MRB1 Complex Exhibit Specialized Functions in Kinetoplastid RNA Editing

We want to thank Kathy Kyler for editing this manuscript, Ken Stuart for supplying monoclonal antisera against RECC subunits, and Laurie K. Read for her gift of polyclonal antisera against GAP1 and RGG2. Funding: National Science Foundation Grant No. NSF1122109 (PI: J.Cruz-Reyes.). NIH/National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases R01 AI088011 (PI: Blaine Mooers). Institutional Development Award (IDeA) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under grant number P20 GM103640. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.Adaptation and survival of Trypanosoma brucei requires editing of mitochondrial mRNA by uridylate (U) insertion and deletion. Hundreds of small guide RNAs (gRNAs) direct the mRNA editing at over 3,000 sites. RNA editing is controlled during the life cycle but the regulation of substrate and stage specificity remains unknown. Editing progresses in the 3’ to 5’ direction along the pre-mRNA in blocks, each targeted by a unique gRNA. A critical editing factor is the mitochondrial RNA binding complex 1 (MRB1) that binds gRNA and transiently interacts with the catalytic RNA editing core complex (RECC). MRB1 is a large and dynamic complex that appears to be comprised of distinct but related subcomplexes (termed here MRBs). MRBs seem to share a ‘core’ complex of proteins but differ in the composition of the ‘variable’ proteins. Since some proteins associate transiently the MRBs remain imprecisely defined. MRB1 controls editing by unknown mechanisms, and the functional relevance of the different MRBs is unclear. We previously identified two distinct MRBs, and showed that they carry mRNAs that undergo editing. We proposed that editing takes place in the MRBs because MRBs stably associate with mRNA and gRNA but only transiently interact with RECC, which is RNA free. Here, we identify the first specialized functions in MRBs: 1) 3010-MRB is a major scaffold for RNA editing, and 2) REH2-MRB contains a critical trans-acting RNA helicase (REH2) that affects multiple steps of editing function in 3010-MRB. These trans effects of the REH2 include loading of unedited mRNA and editing in the first block and in subsequent blocks as editing progresses. REH2 binds its own MRB via RNA, and conserved domains in REH2 were critical for REH2 to associate with the RNA and protein components of its MRB. Importantly, REH2 associates with a ~30 kDa RNA-binding protein in a novel ~15S subcomplex in RNA-depleted mitochondria. We use these new results to update our model of MRB function and organization.Yeshttp://www.plosone.org/static/editorial#pee

25 years of African trypanosome research:From description to molecular dissection and new drug discovery

The Molecular Parasitology conference was first held at the Marine Biological laboratory, Woods Hole, USA 25 years ago. Since that first meeting, the conference has evolved and expanded but has remained the showcase for the latest research developments in molecular parasitology. In this perspective, I reflect on the scientific discoveries focussed on African trypanosomes (Trypanosoma brucei spp.) that have occurred since the inaugural MPM meeting and discuss the current and future status of research on these parasites

Genome and phylogenetic analyses of Trypanosoma evansi reveal extensive similarity to T. brucei and multiple independent origins for dyskinetoplasty.

Two key biological features distinguish Trypanosoma evansi from the T. brucei group: independence from the tsetse fly as obligatory vector, and independence from the need for functional mitochondrial DNA (kinetoplast or kDNA). In an effort to better understand the molecular causes and consequences of these differences, we sequenced the genome of an akinetoplastic T. evansi strain from China and compared it to the T. b. brucei reference strain. The annotated T. evansi genome shows extensive similarity to the reference, with 94.9% of the predicted T. b. brucei coding sequences (CDS) having an ortholog in T. evansi, and 94.6% of the non-repetitive orthologs having a nucleotide identity of 95% or greater. Interestingly, several procyclin-associated genes (PAGs) were disrupted or not found in this T. evansi strain, suggesting a selective loss of function in the absence of the insect life-cycle stage. Surprisingly, orthologous sequences were found in T. evansi for all 978 nuclear CDS predicted to represent the mitochondrial proteome in T. brucei, although a small number of these may have lost functionality. Consistent with previous results, the F1FO-ATP synthase γ subunit was found to have an A281 deletion, which is involved in generation of a mitochondrial membrane potential in the absence of kDNA. Candidates for CDS that are absent from the reference genome were identified in supplementary de novo assemblies of T. evansi reads. Phylogenetic analyses show that the sequenced strain belongs to a dominant group of clonal T. evansi strains with worldwide distribution that also includes isolates classified as T. equiperdum. At least three other types of T. evansi or T. equiperdum have emerged independently. Overall, the elucidation of the T. evansi genome sequence reveals extensive similarity of T. brucei and supports the contention that T. evansi should be classified as a subspecies of T. brucei

Importance of structural features for tRNA(Met) identity.

We showed previously that the tRNA tertiary structure makes an important contribution to the identity of yeast tRNA(Met) (Senger B, Aphasizhev R, Walter P, Fasiolo F, 1995, J Mol Biol 249:45-58). To learn more about the role played by the tRNA framework, we analyzed the effect of some phosphodiester cleavages and 2'OH groups in tRNA binding and aminoacylation. The tRNA is inactivated provided the break occurs in the central core region responsible for the tertiary fold or in the anticodon stem/loop region. We also show that, for tRNA(Met) to bind, the anticodon loop, but not the anticodon stem, requires a ribosephosphate backbone. A tertiary mutant of yeast tRNA(Met) involving interactions from the D- and T-loop unique to the initiator species fails to be aminoacylated, but still binds to yeast methionyl-tRNA synthetase. In the presence of 10 mM MgCl2, the mutant transcript has a 3D fold significantly stabilized by about 30 degrees C over a wild-type transcript as deduced from the measure of their T(m) values. The k(cat) defect of the tRNA(Met) mutant may arise from a failure to overcome an increase of the free energetic cost of distorting the more stable tRNA structure and/or a tRNA based MetRS conformational change required for formation of transition state of aminoacylation

A tale of two TUTases

The insertion and deletion of U residues at specific sites in mRNAs in trypanosome mitochondria is thought to involve 3′ terminal uridylyl transferase (TUTase) activity. TUTase activity is also required to create the nonencoded 3′ oligo[U] tails of the transacting guide RNAs (gRNAs). We have described two TUTases, RET1 (RNA editing TUTase 1) and RET2 (RNA editing TUTase 2) as components of different editing complexes. Tandem affinity purification-tagged Trypanosoma brucei RET2 (TbRET2) was expressed and localized to the cytosol in Leishmania tarentolae cells by removing the mitochondrial signal sequence. Double-affinity isolation yielded tagged TbRET2, together with a few additional proteins. This material exhibits a U-specific transferase activity in which a single U is added to the 3′ end of a single-stranded RNA, thereby confirming that RET2 is a 3′ TUTase. We also found that RNA interference of RET2 expression in T. brucei inhibits in vitro U-insertion editing and has no effect on the length of the 3′ oligo[U] tails of the gRNAs, whereas down-regulation of RET1 has a minor effect on in vitro U-insertion editing, but produces a decrease in the average length of the oligo[U] tails. This finding suggests that RET2 is responsible for U-insertions at editing sites and RET1 is involved in gRNA 3′ end maturation, which is essential for creating functional gRNAs. From these results we have functionally relabeled the previously described TUT-II complex containing RET1 as the guide RNA processing complex

Dual role of the RNA substrate in selectivity and catalysis by terminal uridylyl transferases

Terminal RNA uridylyltransferases (TUTases) catalyze template-independent UMP addition to the 3′ hydroxyl of RNA. TUTases belong to the DNA polymerase β superfamily of nucleotidyltransferases that share a conserved catalytic domain bearing three metal-binding carboxylate residues. We have previously determined crystal structures of the UTP-bound and apo forms of the minimal trypanosomal TUTase, TbTUT4, which is composed solely of the N-terminal catalytic and C-terminal base-recognition domains. Here we report crystal structures of TbTUT4 with bound CTP, GTP, and ATP, demonstrating nearly perfect superposition of the triphosphate moieties with that of the UTP substrate. Consequently, at physiological nucleoside 5′-triphosphate concentrations, the protein–uracil base interactions alone are not sufficient to confer UTP selectivity. To resolve this ambiguity, we determined the crystal structure of a prereaction ternary complex composed of UTP, TbTUT4, and UMP, which mimics an RNA substrate, and the postreaction complex of TbTUT4 with UpU dinucleotide. The UMP pyrimidine ring stacks against the uracil base of the bound UTP, which on its other face also stacks with an essential tyrosine. In contrast, the different orientation of the purine bases observed in cocrystals with ATP and GTP prevents this triple stacking, precluding productive binding of the RNA. The 3′ hydroxyl of the bound UMP is poised for in-line nucleophilic attack while contributing to the formation of a binding site for a second catalytic metal ion. We propose a dual role for RNA substrates in TUTase-catalyzed reactions: contribution to selective incorporation of the cognate nucleoside and shaping of the catalytic metal binding site