25,385 research outputs found

    Properties of nonaqueous electrolytes Quarterly report, 20 Sep. - 19 Dec. 1966

    Get PDF
    Vapor phase chromatographic analysis of dimethyl formamide, and physical properties of electrolytes containing lithium chloride and/or aluminum chlorid

    Effect of delayed acquisition times on Gadolinium-enhanced MRI of the presumably normal canine brain

    Get PDF
    A delay in imaging following intravenous contrast medium administration has been recommended to reduce misdiagnoses. However, the normal variation of contrast enhancement in dogs following a delay has not been characterized. Contrast enhanced MR imaging of 22 dogs was assessed, in terms of identification of normal anatomic structures, to investigate the variation associated with 10 minute delay between contrast medium administration and imaging. All dogs had a normal brain MR imaging study and unremarkable CSF. Specific ROIs were assessed both objectively, using computer software, and subjectively using three observers. Mean contrast enhancement greater than 10% was seen in the pituitary gland, choroid plexus, meninges, temporal muscle, trigeminal nerve and the trigeminal nerve root. Structures with an active blood-brain-barrier had minimal contrast enhancement (<6%). Enhancing structures had significantly more contrast enhancement at t=1min versus t=10min, except in temporal muscle, the trigeminal nerve and the trigeminal nerve root. Inter-observer agreement was moderate to good in favor of the initial post contrast T1w sequence. The observers found either no difference or poor agreement in identification of the non-vascular structures. Intra-observer agreement was very good with all vascular structures and most non-vascular structures. A degree of meningeal enhancement was a consistent finding. The initial acquisition had higher enhancement characteristics and observer agreement for some structures; however, contrast-to-noise was comparable in the delayed phase or not significantly different. We provide baseline references and suggest that the initial T1w post contrast sequence is preferable but not essential should a delayed post contrast T1w sequence be performed

    Properties of nonaqueous electrolytes First quarterly report, 20 Jun. - 19 Sep. 1966

    Get PDF
    Solvent purification and water content determined by gas chromatography for nonaqueous electrolyte

    Properties of nonaqueous electrolytes Quarterly report, 20 Jun. - 19 Sep. 1967

    Get PDF
    Electrolyte preparation, and physical property and nuclear magnetic resonance structural studies of nonaqueous electrolyte

    Normal-Superconducting Phase Transition Mimicked by Current Noise

    Full text link
    As a superconductor goes from the normal state into the superconducting state, the voltage vs. current characteristics at low currents change from linear to non-linear. We show theoretically and experimentally that the addition of current noise to non-linear voltage vs. current curves will create ohmic behavior. Ohmic response at low currents for temperatures below the critical temperature TcT_c mimics the phase transition and leads to incorrect values for TcT_c and the critical exponents ν\nu and zz. The ohmic response occurs at low currents, when the applied current I0I_0 is smaller than the width of the probability distribution σI\sigma_I, and will occur in both the zero-field transition and the vortex-glass transition. Our results indicate that the transition temperature and critical exponents extracted from the conventional scaling analysis are inaccurate if current noise is not filtered out. This is a possible explanation for the wide range of critical exponents found in the literature.Comment: 4 pages, 2 figure

    Effects of Self-field and Low Magnetic Fields on the Normal-Superconducting Phase Transition

    Full text link
    Researchers have studied the normal-superconducting phase transition in the high-TcT_c cuprates in a magnetic field (the vortex-glass or Bose-glass transition) and in zero field. Often, transport measurements in "zero field" are taken in the Earth's ambient field or in the remnant field of a magnet. We show that fields as small as the Earth's field will alter the shape of the current vs. voltage curves and will result in inaccurate values for the critical temperature TcT_c and the critical exponents ν\nu and zz, and can even destroy the phase transition. This indicates that without proper screening of the magnetic field it is impossible to determine the true zero-field critical parameters, making correct scaling and other data analysis impossible. We also show, theoretically and experimentally, that the self-field generated by the current flowing in the sample has no effect on the current vs. voltage isotherms.Comment: 4 pages, 4 figure

    Properties of nonaqueous electrolytes Quarterly report, 20 Dec. 1966 - 19 Mar. 1967

    Get PDF
    Properties of nonaqueous electrolytes - preparation of electrolytes, nuclear magnetic resonance structural studies, and physical property determination
    corecore