More early bleeds associated with high baseline direct oral anticoagulant levels in atrial fibrillation: the MAS study

Treatment with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is effective and safe. However, bleeding complications still occur. Whether DOAC level measurement may further improve treatment efficacy and safety is still an open issue. In the "Measure and See" study, venous blood was collected 15-30 days after DOAC initiation in patients with AF who were then followed up for 1 year to record the occurrence of major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. DOAC plasma levels were measured in 1 laboratory, and results were kept blind to patients and treating doctors. Trough DOAC levels were assessed in 1657 patients (957 [57.7%] and 700 patients treated with standard and low- dose, respectively). Fifty bleeding events were recorded during 1606 years of follow-up (3.11% pt/yrs). Fifteen bleeding events (4.97% pt/yrs) occurred in patients with C-trough standardized values in the highest activity class (>0.50), whereas 35 events (2.69% pt/yrs) occurred in those with values in the 2 lower classes (<= 0.50, P = .0401). Increasing DOAC levels and low-dose DOAC use were associated with increased bleeding risk in the first 3 months of treatment. Overall, 19% of patients receiving low doses had standardized values in the highest class. More bleeding occurred in patients on low (4.3% pt/yrs) vs standard (2.2% pt/yrs; P = .0160) dose DOAC. Early measurement of DOAC levels in patients with AF identified many individuals with high levels despite the low doses use and had more bleeding risk during the first 3 months of treatment. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03803579

D-dimer and reduced-dose apixaban for extended treatment after unprovoked venous thromboembolism: the Apidulcis study.

D-dimer assay is used to stratify patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE) for the risk of recurrence. However, this approach was never evaluated since direct oral anticoagulants are available. With this multicenter, prospective cohort study, we aimed to assess the value of an algorithm incorporating serial D-dimer testing and administration of reduced-dose apixaban (2.5 mg twice daily) only to patients with a positive test. A total of 732 outpatients aged 18 to 74 years, anticoagulated for ≥12 months after a first unprovoked VTE, were included. Patients underwent D-dimer testing with commercial assays and preestablished cutoffs. If the baseline D-dimer during anticoagulation was negative, anticoagulation was stopped and testing repeated after 15, 30, and 60 days. Patients with serially negative results (286 [39.1%]) were left without anticoagulation. At the first positive result, the remaining 446 patients (60.9%) were given apixaban for 18 months. All patients underwent follow-up planned for 18 months. The study was interrupted after a planned interim analysis for the high rate of primary outcomes (7.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.5-11.2), including symptomatic proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) recurrence, death for VTE, and major bleeding occurring in patients off anticoagulation vs that in those receiving apixaban (1.1%; 95% CI, 0.4-2.6; adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 8.2; 95% CI, 3.2-25.3). In conclusion, in patients anticoagulated for ≥1 year after a first unprovoked VTE, the decision to further extend anticoagulation should not be based on D-dimer testing. The results confirmed the high efficacy and safety of reduced-dose apixaban against recurrences. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03678506

Direct oral anticoagulants and therapeutic adherence: do not let your guard down

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) and vitamin K antagonist drugs (VKA) are recommended for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and for treatment of venous thromboembolism. Undoubtedly, DOAC have contributed to improve quality of life of these patients, but unfortunately, available \u2018real world\u2019 data show a very high variable compliance to DOAC. Aims and objectives: to evaluate predictors that adversely affect therapeutic adherence in patients naive (Formula presented.) to DOAC. Methods and population: this study was conducted on an outpatient population in oral anticoagulant therapy in a period between January 2019 and February 2020. Patients naiveto DOAC and treated for at least 6 months were enrolled. Non-Italian-speaking patients, cognitive or psychiatric disorders, refusal to participate or non-consent to the interview were exclusion criteria. A socio-demographic scale and the 8-item Morisky scale (MMAS-8) questionnaire assessed therapeutic adherence. Results: One hundred two DOAC-na\uefve patients were selected from a population of 407 patients on the first visit at our centre. The population was homogeneously represented for gender (males 48%). The mean age was 79.5 years. Atrial fibrillation (65.7%) resulted the main reason for DOAC prescription and a polypharmacy was detected in 47.1% of the patients. Moreover, an optimal adherence to DOAC therapy was assessed in less than 30% of patients. Conclusions: Polypharmacy, patient\u2019s isolation, such as a low education level were statistically associated with a low therapeutic adherence. Therapeutic adherence remains an unsolved problem for anticoagulated patient. To identify patients at higher risk of poor compliance and therapeutic failure and establish targeted care pathways is a priority