Survey team on : conceptualisations of the role of competencies, knowing and knowledge in mathematics education research

This paper presents the outcomes of the work of the ICME 13 Survey Team on 'Conceptualisation and the role of competencies, knowing and knowledge in mathematics education research'. It surveys a variety of historical and contemporary views and conceptualisations of what it means to master mathematics, focusing on notions such as mathematical competence and competencies, mathematical proficiency, and mathematical practices, amongst others. The paper provides theoretical analyses of these notions-under the generic heading of mathematical competencies-and gives an overview of selected research on and by means of them. Furthermore, an account of the introduction and implementation of competency notions in the curricula in various countries and regions is given, and pertinent issues are reviewed. The paper is concluded with a set of reflections on current trends and challenges concerning mathematical competencie

Mathematical Proficiency for All Students: Toward a Strategic Research and Development Program in Mathematics Education

A clear need exists for substantial improvement in mathematics proficiency in U.S. schools. The RAND Mathematics Study Panel was convened to inform the U.S. Department of Education's Office of Educational Research and Improvement on ways to improve the quality and usability of education research and development (R&D). The panel identified three areas for focused R&D: development of teachers' mathematical knowledge used in teaching; teaching and learning of skills needed for mathematical thinking and problem-solving; and teaching and learning of algebra from kindergarten through the 12th grade

Using three levels in design of effective teacher-education tasks: The case of promoting conflicts with intuitive understandings in probability

This paper describes a three-level framework (technical, domain, and generic) which enables some generalisability across mathematics topics for effective teacher–education (TE) task design. It argues that TE tasks which encompass these levels increase pre-service and in-service teachers’ interest because they transcend the particular mathematical focus and pedagogical activity within the TE tasks and enable translation to classrooms (technical), enhance the success of student learning (domain), and facilitate transfer to other topics (generic). The paper then uses the levels to analyse an effective probability task (based on circular spinners) which involves cognitive conflict between formal and intuitive probability at all three levels, namely, with regard to facilitating non-random results (technical), differences between probabilistic and deterministic mathematics and area and set models (domain), and non-prototypic exemplars and validation in probability experiments (generic). The paper concludes with reference to the power of effective TE tasks in showing how connectivity of mathematics (e.g., fractions and probability) requires similar connectivity in pedagogy