40 research outputs found

    A Comparison of Circular and Slotted Synthetic Jets for Flow Control in a Twin Air Intake

    Get PDF
    The performance of an aircraft engine depends on air flow quality at the engine face / the exit of the air-intake also known as aerodynamic inlet plane (AIP). A single-engine aircraft has complex Y-shaped twin air-intake which causes severe flow separation, distortion and flow non-uniformity at the AIP. The present study compares the efficacy of slotted synthetic jet and a row of four circular synthetic jets attached to inner faces of a twin air-intake to improve aerodynamic performance at the AIP. The results are obtained using computational fluid dynamics. The velocity and vorticity plots show that lateral spread of the circular jets is limited as compared to the slotted jet. The circular jets are found to be weak as compared to slotted jet to prevent separation of main flow occurring in the twin air-intake. The various aerodynamic performance parameters, such as static pressure recovery coefficient, total pressure loss coefficient, distortion coefficient and secondary flow uniformity are compared for both the cases, exhibiting marked improvement in all these parameters. The study demonstrates that the slotted synthetic jets is a better option for controlling flow in twin air-intake as compared to a row of circular synthetic jets

    The New Criticism and Deconstruction: Attitudes to Language and Literature

    Full text link

    Introduction

    Full text link

    Impacts of Transit Priority on Signal Coordination

    No full text
    This study introduces the current application of transit signal priority (TSP) in the City of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, and focuses on the following: traffic signal operations, constraints of the current signal control system and TSP technology, evaluation metrics, and models for simulating transit priority operation. In Toronto, 335 traffic signals have transit priority, 321 of which are under the control of the main traffic signal system (MTSS). Active transit priority unconditionally allows an extension of up to 30 s per cycle in addition to the normal signal green time on transit routes. The extension generates complaints about traffic delays for vehicles on side streets, long pedestrian wait times, and poor signal coordination. Field tests were conducted on a section of a downtown Toronto arterial bus route. Actual MTSS logs and signpost data obtained by the transit agency during field tests were used to investigate three scenarios along Bathurst Street at six signalized intersections. An analysis of signal timing changes that encompassed selection and determination of traffic operation performance measures was conducted on a per-cycle basis in the morning peak, afternoon peak, and off-peak periods. Green-band effectiveness was one of the evaluation measures used to assess signal progression. Subsequently, a performance assessment frame based on a model for the analytic hierarchy process was built to determine the best scenario and to help develop simulation models. The analysis shows that the TSP strategy of unconditional extension up to 30 s in signal green time is not recommended for use with the existing system of traffic signal control. The approaches described can apply to different transit routes with variable situations in Toronto

    State Energy and Climate Index: Round-I

    No full text
    The index has a preliminary set of 27 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) covering 6 parameters ‘DISCOM’s performance’, ‘access, affordability &amp;amp; reliability of energy’,‘clean energy initiatives’, ‘energy efficiency’, ‘environmental sustainability’ and ‘new initiatives’.</p
    corecore