Sharing bad news of a lung cancer diagnosis: understanding through communication privacy management theory.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this paper is to understand the process of information disclosure and privacy as patients share their news of lung cancer with significant others. METHODS: Twenty patients with lung cancer and 17 family members/friends accompanying them at diagnosis-giving completed either individual or dyad semi-structured interviews. Initial thematic analysis, then Petronio's Communication Privacy Management theory was used to inform interpretation. RESULTS: Patients described a sense of ownership of the news of their cancer and sought control of how, when and with whom it was shared. Family members expressed a need to follow the patients' rules in sharing this news, which limited their own support systems. Patients and family members had to live within the relational communication boundaries in order to maintain their trusting relationship and avoid potential disruptions. CONCLUSION: Patients as individuals are strongly interlinked with significant others, which impacts on their experience of disclosing private information. This shapes their psychological processes and outcomes impacting on their illness experience. This should be considered when developing interventions to support patients with sharing bad news. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.This project was funded by Dimbleby Cancer Care Research FundThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Wiley via http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pon.402

Acquiring a pet dog significantly reduces stress of primary carers for children with autism spectrum disorder: a prospective case control study

This study describes the impact of pet dogs on stress of primary carers of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Stress levels of 38 primary carers acquiring a dog and 24 controls not acquiring a dog were sampled at: Pre-intervention (17 weeks before acquiring a dog), post-intervention (3–10 weeks after acquisition) and follow-up (25–40 weeks after acquisition), using the Parenting Stress Index. Analysis revealed significant improvements in the intervention compared to the control group for Total Stress, Parental Distress and Difficult Child. A significant number of parents in the intervention group moved from clinically high to normal levels of Parental Distress. The results highlight the potential of pet dogs to reduce stress in primary carers of children with an ASD

How do women at increased breast cancer risk perceive and decide between risks of cancer and risk-reducing treatments? A synthesis of qualitative research

Objective: Risk‐reducing procedures can be offered to people at increased cancer risk, but many procedures can have iatrogenic effects. People therefore need to weigh risks associated with both cancer and the risk‐reduction procedure in their decisions. By reviewing relevant literature on breast cancer (BC) risk reduction, we aimed to understand how women at relatively high risk of BC perceive their risk and how their risk perceptions influence their decisions about risk reduction. Methods: Synthesis of 15 qualitative studies obtained from systematic searches of SCOPUS, Web of Knowledge, PsychINFO, and Medline electronic databases (inception‐June 2015). Results: Women did not think about risk probabilistically. Instead, they allocated themselves to broad risk categories, typically influenced by their own or familial experiences of BC. In deciding about risk‐reduction procedures, some women reported weighing the risks and benefits, but papers did not describe how they did so. For many women, however, an overriding wish to reduce intense worry about BC led them to choose aggressive risk‐reducing procedures without such deliberation. Conclusions: Reasoning that categorisation is a fundamental aspect of risk perception, we argue that patients can be encouraged to develop more nuanced and accurate categorisations of their own risk through their interactions with clinicians. Empirically‐based ethical reflection is required to determine whether and when it is appropriate to provide risk‐reduction procedures to alleviate worry

Enhancing patient-provider encounters when proposing SDF therapy by utilizing a qualitative analysis of parental feedback

PurposeSilver Diamine Fluoride (SDF) is a minimally invasive option for caries arrest, part of a paradigm shift in the management of pediatric dental caries. The perspective of parents regarding the long-term pros and cons of this therapy should be understood in order to achieve optimal patient-centered care.MethodsThis study used Constant comparative analysis as an analytic approach, applying the Precaution-Adoption Process Model (PAPM) as the Grounded Theory framework in the qualitative analysis of 30 parental unformatted, spontaneous comments collected at the end of a questionnaire to evaluate their satisfaction with treatment provided at a University Clinic.ResultsOur analysis provided important insights about the factors that influenced the parents’ decision to act and have their child receive SDF therapy, their perception of the outcomes, the necessary follow-ups after the therapy, and what impacted on their overall satisfaction with the completed procedure. Both positive and negative themes were identified. The positive themes point to SDF treatment's ease of application and addressing the immediate treatment needs on children with limited cooperation. The negative themes identified the adverse consequences of SDF treatment, specifically, the duration and appearance of the cosmetic consequences, as well as the parents’ misunderstandings and incorrect expectations of the long-term sustainability of the treatment, which in many instances requires further interventions. It was also evident from the parents’ comments that they needed additional educational guidance on other aspects of the treatment, such as the necessity for clinical follow-ups, information that impacted parents’ overall satisfaction with the treatment their child received.ConclusionOur results highlight the need to discuss the short and long term benefits of the treatment, as well as, its short and long-term limitations. Specifically, while it is important to discuss immediate outcomes and consequences, such as the ease of treatment and the resultant staining, to ensure that parental consent for the treatment is truly well-informed, it is also important to prepare parents, when this procedure is initially proposed, of the likely need for additional oral care interventions in the future

Mono- versus polydrug abuse patterns among publicly funded clients

To examine patterns of mono- versus polydrug abuse, data were obtained from intake records of 69,891 admissions to publicly funded treatment programs in Tennessee between 1998 and 2004. While descriptive statistics were employed to report frequency and patterns of mono- and polydrug abuse by demographic variables and by study years, bivariate logistic regression was applied to assess the probability of being a mono- or polydrug abuser for a number of demographic variables. The researchers found that during the study period 51.3% of admissions reported monodrug abuse and 48.7% reported polydrug abuse. Alcohol, cocaine, and marijuana were the most commonly abused substances, both alone and in combination. Odds ratio favored polydrug abuse for all but one drug category–other drugs. Gender did not affect drug abuse patterns; however, admissions for African Americans and those living in urban areas exhibited higher probabilities of polydrug abuse. Age group also appeared to affect drug abuse patterns, with higher odds of monodrug abuse among minors and adults over 45 years old. The discernable prevalence of polydrug abuse suggests a need for developing effective prevention strategies and treatment plans specific to polydrug abuse

Challenges and Perspectives on Breast Cancer Survivorship: The Journey Continues

Abstract Women have a 1-in-8 lifetime risk of breast cancer. Earlier diagnosis and treatment advances have improved 15- and 20-year survival rates. Increased survival can mean coping with the effects of cancer and its treatment over an extended period of time, while experiencing age-related changes in functioning and the emergence of other health issues. To explore breast cancer survivors’ perspectives on their issues and concerns across the life-course, focus groups were conducted with a culturally diverse sample (N=18) of survivors (72% white, 28% Black, 11% Hispanic). Participants were 44-82 years old. Most, 83% were 50 and older, 56% were 60 and older. The majority (83%) were diagnosed in their 40’s and 50’s. Two were diagnosed in their early 30’s and one at age 68. Participants reaffirmed the necessity, as a breast cancer survivor, of being a life-long health advocate on their own behalf, and the importance of being self-informed. As one woman commented: “Knowledge is power”. Survivors shared that their emergent health issues were complicated by their cancer history, and, that, as a cancer survivor, “I never stop worrying”. A widespread concern was not knowing if the health issues and co-morbidities they experienced (such as joint pain, neuropathy, tendinitis, heart disease), were age-related, a consequence of their cancer, or a late treatment effect. An overriding sentiment expressed was that clinicians have not recognized the importance of quality of life in cancer survival. As a survivor succinctly stated: “We are living longer, but we need to live long with quality of life.”</jats:p