The value and challenges of collegiality in practice

The ability to work optimally with colleagues is considered to be a valuable determinant of success, but collegiality is a challenge to assess. Could you be more collegial, and what might be the benefits and drawbacks for clinical practice? How could you be more collegial and foster more collegiality amongst those you work with? What is collegiality and what does it mean to be collegial? Collegiality can be defined as the relationship between individuals working towards a common purpose within an organisation. The concept has its origins in the roman practice of sharing responsibility equally between government officials of the same rank in order to prevent a single individual from gaining too much power. In contrast, managerialism does not provide opportunities for exploring democratic consensus because it promotes being responsive and obedient to implementing the wishes of authority (Dearlove, 1997, King, 2004). Collegiality emphasises trust, independent thinking and sharing between co-workers. This encourages both autonomy and mutual respect and can impact on organisational efficacy (Donohoo, 2017). In modern day practice, the focus is less on sharing responsibility between officials of the same rank and more on ensuring that all employees within an organisation are treated with equal respect as individual people (Lorenzen, 2006)

Developing contemporary models for understanding and treating sex addiction in the digital age

Sex addiction has been a highly contentious and controversial label since its conception in the early 80’s and debates continue between academics, therapists and sexologists. This context statement is a reflexive audit of the conception and evolution of public works that have been influenced by, and address these arguments. These public works, on which I base my doctoral claim, have broadened the understanding and treatment of sex and porn addiction for the counselling and therapeutic communities, other health professionals and the general public. A critical reflection of the development and evolution of five pan-theoretical models is presented that conceptualise, assess and treat sex and porn addiction. The rationale and background research for each of these models is described along with how each can be used in clinical practice. A reflective critique of my personal and professional development is also provided to explain the context to this work and my role within it. A significant contribution of the public works is that they bridge the divide between psychodynamic, psychosexual and addiction disciplines and provide new ways to understand and treat, what is still, a relatively new problem. They also encapsulate the complexity of case formulation and treatment and encourage a sex positive approach that addresses relapse prevention and concurrent psychological and relational issues. This doctoral claim is supported by an evidence section that details how the models have been shared with both professionals and the general public through extensive writing, including four books published by Routledge, teaching and public speaking and the development of the CPCAB level 5 accredited diploma in sex addiction counselling

Yoga for stroke rehabilitation

Background: Stroke is a major health issue and cause of long-term disability and has a major emotional and socioeconomic impact. There is a need to explore options for long-term sustainable interventions that support stroke survivors to engage in meaningful activities to address life challenges after stroke. Rehabilitation focuses on recovery of function and cognition to the maximum level achievable, and may include a wide range of complementary strategies including yoga. Yoga is a mind-body practice that originated in India, and which has become increasingly widespread in the Western world. Recent evidence highlights the positive effects of yoga for people with a range of physical and psychological health conditions. A recent non-Cochrane systematic review concluded that yoga can be used as self-administered practice in stroke rehabilitation. Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of yoga, as a stroke rehabilitation intervention, on recovery of function and quality of life (QoL). Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched July 2017), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (last searched July 2017), MEDLINE (to July 2017), Embase (to July 2017), CINAHL (to July 2017), AMED (to July 2017), PsycINFO (to July 2017), LILACS (to July 2017), SciELO (to July 2017), IndMED (to July 2017), OTseeker (to July 2017) and PEDro (to July 2017). We also searched four trials registers, and one conference abstracts database. We screened reference lists of relevant publications and contacted authors for additional information. Selection criteria: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared yoga with a waiting-list control or no intervention control in stroke survivors. Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently extracted data from the included studies. We performed all analyses using Review Manager (RevMan). One review author entered the data into RevMan; another checked the entries. We discussed disagreements with a third review author until consensus was reached. We used the Cochrane 'Risk of bias' tool. Where we considered studies to be sufficiently similar, we conducted a meta-analysis by pooling the appropriate data. For outcomes for which it was inappropriate or impossible to pool quantitatively, we conducted a descriptive analysis and provided a narrative summary. Main results: We included two RCTs involving 72 participants. Sixty-nine participants were included in one meta-analysis (balance). Both trials assessed QoL, along with secondary outcomes measures relating to movement and psychological outcomes; one also measured disability. In one study the Stroke Impact Scale was used to measure QoL across six domains, at baseline and post-intervention. The effect of yoga on five domains (physical, emotion, communication, social participation, stroke recovery) was not significant; however, the effect of yoga on the memory domain was significant (mean difference (MD) 15.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.29 to 29.31, P = 0.03), the evidence for this finding was very low grade. In the second study, QoL was assessed using the Stroke-Specifc QoL Scale; no significant effect was found. Secondary outcomes included movement, strength and endurance, and psychological variables, pain, and disability. Balance was measured in both studies using the Berg Balance Scale; the effect of intervention was not significant (MD 2.38, 95% CI -1.41 to 6.17, P = 0.22). Sensititivy analysis did not alter the direction of effect. One study measured balance self-efficacy, using the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (MD 10.60, 95% CI -7.08,= to 28.28, P = 0.24); the effect of intervention was not significant; the evidence for this finding was very low grade. One study measured gait using the Comfortable Speed Gait Test (MD 1.32, 95% CI -1.35 to 3.99, P = 0.33), and motor function using the Motor Assessment Scale (MD -4.00, 95% CI -12.42 to 4.42, P = 0.35); no significant effect was found based on very low-grade evidence. One study measured disability using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) but reported only whether participants were independent or dependent. No significant effect was found: (odds ratio (OR) 2.08, 95% CI 0.50 to 8.60, P = 0.31); the evidence for this finding was very low grade. Anxiety and depression were measured in one study. Three measures were used: the Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form (GCDS15), and two forms of State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI, Form Y) to measure state anxiety (i.e. anxiety experienced in response to stressful situations) and trait anxiety (i.e. anxiety associated with chronic psychological disorders). No significant effect was found for depression (GDS15, MD -2.10, 95% CI -4.70 to 0.50, P = 0.11) or for trait anxiety (STAI-Y2, MD -6.70, 95% CI -15.35 to 1.95, P = 0.13), based on very low-grade evidence. However, a significant effect was found for state anxiety: STAI-Y1 (MD -8.40, 95% CI -16.74 to -0.06, P = 0.05); the evidence for this finding was very low grade. No adverse events were reported. Quality of the evidence: We assessed the quality of the evidence using GRADE. Overall, the quality of the evidence was very low, due to the small number of trials included in the review both of which were judged to be at high risk of bias, particularly in relation to incompleteness of data and selective reporting, and especially regarding the representative nature of the sample in one study. Authors' conclusions: Yoga has the potential for being included as part of patient-centred stroke rehabilitation. However, this review has identified insufficient information to confirm or refute the effectiveness or safety of yoga as a stroke rehabilitation treatment. Further large-scale methodologically robust trials are required to establish the effectiveness of yoga as a stroke rehabilitation treatment