Impact on and use of an inner-city London Infectious Diseases Department by international migrants: a questionnaire survey

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The UK has witnessed a considerable increase in immigration in the past decade. Migrant may face barriers to accessing appropriate health care on arrival and the current focus on screening certain migrants for tuberculosis on arrival is considered inadequate. We assessed the implications for an inner-city London Infectious Diseases Department in a high migrant area.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>We administered an anonymous 20-point questionnaire survey to all admitted patients during a 6 week period. Questions related to sociodemographic characteristics and clinical presentation. Analysis was by migration status (UK born <it>vs </it>overseas born).</p> <p>Results</p> <p>111 of 133 patients completed the survey (response rate 83.4%). 58 (52.2%) were born in the UK; 53 (47.7%) of the cohort were overseas born. Overseas-born were over-represented in comparison to Census data for this survey site (47.7% <it>vs </it>33.6%; proportional difference 0.142 [95% CI 0.049–0.235]; p = 0.002): overseas born reported 33 different countries of birth, most (73.6%) of whom arrived in the UK pre-1975 and self-reported their nationality as British. A smaller number (26.4%) were new migrants to the UK (≤10 years), mostly refugees/asylum seekers. Overseas-born patients presented with a broad range and more severe spectrum of infections, differing from the UK-born population, resulting in two deaths in this group only. Presentation with a primary infection was associated with refugee/asylum status (n = 8; OR 6.35 [95% CI 1.28–31.50]; p = 0.023), being a new migrant (12; 10.62 [2.24–50.23]; p = 0.003), and being overseas born (31; 3.69 [1.67–8.18]; p = 0.001). Not having registered with a primary-care physician was associated with being overseas born, being a refugee/asylum seeker, being a new migrant, not having English as a first language, and being in the UK for ≤5 years. No significant differences were found between groups in terms of duration of illness prior to presentation or duration of hospitalisation (mean 11.74 days [SD 12.69]).</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Migrants presented with a range of more severe infections, which suggests they face barriers to accessing appropriate health care and screening both on arrival and once settled through primary care services. A more organised and holistic approach to migrant health care is required.</p

Beyond Hip Fracture: Orthopaedic Trauma in an Aging America

Abstract Trauma related death and disability is common among working-age Americans, however the impact on older adults is consequential and increasing. Fractures are the most common traumatic injury diagnosis among Medicare beneficiaries, and though fragility fractures continue to be an important health problem, recent data indicate an increase in high-energy fractures. The purpose of this study was to produce national incidence estimates among US men and women ≥ 65 years using data from the 2003-2014 National Inpatient Sample (NIS). The study cohort included hospitalizations involving upper and/or lower extremity fractures which were further classified by mechanism as high or low energy using external cause of injury codes. Incidence was computed using survey weights provided by NIS, and population estimates from the Census Bureau. The incidence of high-energy fractures increased from 744.1/100,000 persons (95%CI: 681.1–807.1) in 2003 to 821.4/100,000 (95%CI: 795.0 – 874.8) in 2014 in women, and from 359.1/100,000 (95%CI: 331.4–386.8) to 408.2/100,000 (95%CI: 394.–809.2) in men. Over 80% were motor vehicle related. The greatest increase was among those ≥ 85 (1,856.4/100,000 to 2,126.3/100,000 in women; 1,069.1/100,000 to 1,215.1/100,000 in men). Simultaneously, the incidence of low-energy fractures declined: 748.4/100,000 (95%CI: 687.5–809.2) to 443.8/100,000 (95%CI: 423.5 -464.1) in women, and 310.6/100,000 (95%CI: 285 – 336.2) to 206.3/100,000 (95%CI: 196.5 - 216) in men. Results suggest that fractures commonly seen in younger adults will be seen more frequently in older age. It is therefore essential to establish treatment pathways to optimize outcomes for the growing number of injured older adults.</jats:p