123 research outputs found
Factors associated with good self-rated health of non-disabled elderly living alone in Japan: a cross-sectional study
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Self-rated health (SRH) is reported as a reliable predictor of disability and mortality in the aged population and has been studied worldwide to enhance the quality of life of the elderly. Nowadays, the elderly living alone, a particular population at great risk of suffering physical and mental health problems, is increasing rapidly in Japan and could potentially make up the majority of the aged population. However, few data are available pertaining to SRH of this population. Given the fact that sufficient healthcare is provided to the disabled elderly whereas there is little support for non-disabled elderly, we designed this population-based survey to investigate SRH of non-disabled elderly living alone and to identify the factors associated with good SRH with the purpose of aiding health promotion for the elderly.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A cross-sectional study was conducted in a metropolitan suburb in Japan. Questionnaires pertaining to SRH and physical conditions, lifestyle factors, psychological status, and social activities, were distributed in October 2005 to individuals aged ≥ 65 years and living alone. Response rate was 75.1%. Among these respondents, a total of 600 male and 2587 female respondents were identified as non-disabled elderly living alone and became our subjects. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the factors associated with good SRH and sex-specific effect was tested by stepwise logistic regression.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Good SRH was reported by 69.8% of men and 73.8% of women. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that good SRH correlated with, in odds ratio sequence, "can go out alone to distant places", no depression, no weight loss, absence of self-rated chronic disease, good chewing ability, and good visual ability in men; whereas with "can go out alone to distant places", absence of self-rated chronic disease, no weight loss, no depression, no risk of falling, independent IADL, good chewing ability, good visual ability, and social integration (attend) in women.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>For the non-disabled elderly living alone, sex-appropriate support should be considered by health promotion systems from the view point of SRH. Overall, the ability to go out alone to distant places is crucial to SRH of both men and women.</p
On the comparison of material interpolation schemes and optimal composite properties in plane shape optimization
Comparative genome analysis of rice-pathogenic Burkholderia provides insight into capacity to adapt to different environments and hosts
Cemented versus Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty for Hip Fractures: A Systematic Review of Randomised Controlled Trials
We performed a systematic review of randomised controlled trials in order to identify the best available evidence to compare the outcome between cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasty for treatment of intracapsular hip fractures. We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, CINAHL, MEDLINE and the National Research Register (UK) to retrieve all of the published randomised controlled trials designed to address these issues, in order to perform a meta-analysis. Eight studies involving 1169 patients were determined to be appropriate for meta-analysis. The following statistically significant differences were found between the cemented and uncemented prostheses: (1) longer operative time for cemented prosthesis; (2) lower reduction in mobility score for those treated with cemented prosthesis; (3) fewer patients with residual pain in the hip and lower pain score (signifying less pain) for those treated with a cemented prosthesis. Our meta-analysis has shown that there is good evidence that the use of cement during hemiarthroplasty will reduce the amount of residual hip pain and also allow better restoration of function. There is no evidence of significant adverse effects of cement on mortality or other complications encountered. These observations apply to older designs, and there is a need for randomised trials comparing hydroxyapatite-coated modern stems with cemented prostheses. </jats:p
Fetal bradycardia and disseminated coagulopathy: atypical presentation of amniotic fluid emboli
Tips for success in interviewing for a national training number in trauma and orthopaedics
Techniques to enhance your application, preparation and performance. </jats:p
- …
