Antimicrobial Therapies for Early-Onset Group B Streptococcal Sepsis: Insights from an Italian Multicenter Study

Background: Antimicrobial therapies used for treating group B streptococcus (GBS) early-onset sepsis (EOS) provide insight into clinicians' adherence to antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) guidelines. Methods: We reviewed antimicrobial therapies given to treat newborns with GBS-EOS. Data were obtained from an Italian surveillance network (including 35 birthing centers) and were prospectively collected from 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2024. Empiric and definitive therapies were classified as adequate and inadequate. Results: There were 967,054 live births and 200 cases of GBS-EOS, of which 43 (21.5%) were preterm and 157 (78.5%) were full-term; 35 (17.5%) out of 200 showed no signs of illness. Fourteen (7.0%) died (one full-term and thirteen preterm newborns under 34 weeks of gestation). Based on the available information, antibiotics were adequate in 106/137 (77.4%) empiric and 48/119 (40.3%) definitive therapies. The duration of antibiotic courses did not differ between severe (median 10 days, IQR 8.0-14.0) and non-severe cases (median: 10 days; IQR: 10.0-12.5; p = 0.68). Antibiotic treatments lasted >= 15 days in 34 (20.1%) out of 169 cases with available information. Conclusions: In this large Italian multicenter study, deviations from international recommendations in antimicrobial therapies for GBS-EOS were critical. Our findings underscore the importance of timely antimicrobial de-escalation and the need to avoid excessively prolonged courses of antimicrobials

Communication and visiting policies in Italian intensive care units during the first COVID-19 pandemic wave and lockdown: a nationwide survey

Background: During the first coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic wave, an unprecedented number of patients with respiratory failure due to a new, highly contagious virus needed hospitalization and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The aim of the present study was to describe the communication and visiting policies of Italian intensive care units (ICUs) during the first COVID-19 pandemic wave and national lockdown and compare these data with prepandemic conditions. Methods: A national web-based survey was conducted among 290 Italian hospitals. Each ICU (active between February 24 and May 31, 2020) was encouraged to complete an individual questionnaire inquiring the hospital/ICU structure/organization, communication/visiting habits and the role of clinical psychology prior to, and during the first COVID-19 pandemic wave. Results: Two hundred and nine ICUs from 154 hospitals (53% of the contacted hospitals) completed the survey (202 adult and 7 pediatric ICUs). Among adult ICUs, 60% were dedicated to COVID-19 patients, 21% were dedicated to patients without COVID-19 and 19% were dedicated to both categories (Mixed). A total of 11,102 adult patients were admitted to the participating ICUs during the study period and only approximately 6% of patients received at least one visit. Communication with family members was guaranteed daily through an increased use of electronic devices and was preferentially addressed to the same family member. Compared to the prepandemic period, clinical psychologists supported physicians more often regarding communication with family members. Fewer patients received at least one visit from family members in COVID and mixed-ICUs than in non-COVID ICUs, l (0 [0–6]%, 0 [0–4]% and 11 [2–25]%, respectively, p < 0.001). Habits of pediatric ICUs were less affected by the pandemic. Conclusions: Visiting policies of Italian ICUs dedicated to adult patients were markedly altered during the first COVID-19 wave. Remote communication was widely adopted as a surrogate for family meetings. New strategies to favor a family-centered approach during the current and future pandemics are warranted

An 84-year-old woman with shortness of breath and low oxygen saturation: \u201cthink outside the box\u201d

An 84-year-old woman, who had been admitted to the emergency department (ED) several times because of dyspnoea, was treated for acute exacerbation of chronic respiratory failure without satisfactory clinical improvement. According to her medical history, 8 years earlier, she underwent a complicated cardiosurgical procedure that required tracheostomy and mechanical ventilation in the post-operative period for 45 days. Traditional X-Ray did not show any abnormal findings; however, high resolution thorax computed tomography (HRCT) scan revealed a severe tracheal stenosis, which was confirmed with bronchoscopy, and required immediate tracheostomy. Tracheal stenosis is a rare but severe complication that should be suspected when a patient with previous tracheostomy presents to the ED with dyspnoea even if tracheostomy had been closed many years before, because adaptive mechanism results in asymptomatic life for a long period