12 research outputs found

    Locomotor Adaptation versus Perceptual Adaptation when Stepping Over an Obstacle with a Height Illusion

    Get PDF
    Background During locomotion, vision is used to perceive environmental obstacles that could potentially threaten stability; locomotor action is then modified to avoid these obstacles. Various factors such as lighting and texture can make these environmental obstacles appear larger or smaller than their actual size. It is unclear if gait is adapted based on the actual or perceived height of these environmental obstacles. The purposes of this study were to determine if visually guided action is scaled to visual perception, and to determine if task experience influenced how action is scaled to perception. Methodology/Principal Findings Participants judged the height of two obstacles before and after stepping over each of them 50 times. An illusion made obstacle one appear larger than obstacle two, even though they were identical in size. The influence of task experience was examined by comparing the perception-action relationship during the first five obstacle crossings (1–5) with the last five obstacle crossings (46–50). In the first set of trials, obstacle one was perceived to be 2.0 cm larger than obstacle two and subjects stepped 2.7 cm higher over obstacle one. After walking over the obstacle 50 times, the toe elevation was not different between obstacles, but obstacle one was still perceived as 2.4 cm larger. Conclusions/Significance There was evidence of locomotor adaptation, but no evidence of perceptual adaptation with experience. These findings add to research that demonstrates that while the motor system can be influenced by perception, it can also operate independent of perception

    An Outline of a Theory of Affordances

    No full text
    A theory of affordances is outlined according to which affordances are relations be-tween the abilities of animals and features of the environment. As relations, affordances are both real and perceivable but are not properties of either the environ-ment or the animal. I argue that this theory has advantages over extant theories of affordances and briefly discuss the relations among affordances and niches, perceivers, and events. The primary difference between direct and inferential theories of perception con-cerns the location of perceptual content, the meaning of our perceptions. In infer-ential theories of perception, these meanings arise inside animals, based on their interactions with the physical environment. Light, for example, bumps into recep-tors, causing a sensation. The animal (or its brain) performs inferences on the sen-sation, yielding a meaningful perception. In direct theories of perception, on the other hand, meaning is in the environment, and perception does not depend on meaning-conferring inferences; instead, the animal simply gathers information from a meaning-laden environment. However, if the environment contains mean-ings, then it cannot be merely physical. This places a heavy theoretical burden on direct theories of perception, a burden so severe that it may outweigh all the advan-tages to conceiving perception as direct.1 This is because direct theories of percep-tion require a new ontology, one that is at odds with today’s physicalist, reductionist consensus that says the world just is the physical world, full stop

    The influence of perturbing the working surface during reaching and grasping in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy

    No full text
    Purpose. To examine unimanual and bimanual reaching and grasping in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy with particular emphasis on the nature and extent of interlimb coupling when the working surface is perturbed. Method. Nine children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy and 7 control children with no movement difficulties took part in the study. Children were asked to pick up a cube unimamually and bimanually when the surface it was placed on was either sloping away from the child (Experiment 1) or towards the child (Experiment 2). Both 3D kinematic data and video data were gathered and qualitative descriptions of video data were made. Results. The working surface did indeed influence the nature and extent of interlimb coupling and this varied from participant to participant. Analysis of the displacement data revealed that during the bimanual condition lower trajectories were produced by both the hemiplegic and non hemiplegic sides, especially in Experiment 2. The control group showed little difference between the unimanual and bimanual condition. Conclusions. Evidence of interlimb coupling is found, these studies support the findings of our previous work that indicates that there are some benefits to performing bimanual movements in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy

    Exploratory Movement Generates Higher-Order Information That Is Sufficient for Accurate Perception of Scaled Egocentric Distance

    No full text
    Body movement influences the structure of multiple forms of ambient energy, including optics and gravito-inertial force. Some researchers have argued that egocentric distance is derived from inferential integration of visual and non-visual stimulation. We suggest that accurate information about egocentric distance exists in perceptual stimulation as higher-order patterns that extend across optics and inertia. We formalize a pattern that specifies the egocentric distance of a stationary object across higher-order relations between optics and inertia. This higher-order parameter is created by self-generated movement of the perceiver in inertial space relative to the illuminated environment. For this reason, we placed minimal restrictions on the exploratory movements of our participants. We asked whether humans can detect and use the information available in this higher-order pattern. Participants judged whether a virtual object was within reach. We manipulated relations between body movement and the ambient structure of optics and inertia. Judgments were precise and accurate when the higher-order optical-inertial parameter was available. When only optic flow was available, judgments were poor. Our results reveal that participants perceived egocentric distance from the higher-order, optical-inertial consequences of their own exploratory activity. Analysis of participants' movement trajectories revealed that self-selected movements were complex, and tended to optimize availability of the optical-inertial pattern that specifies egocentric distance. We argue that accurate information about egocentric distance exists in higher-order patterns of ambient energy, that self-generated movement can generate these higher-order patterns, and that these patterns can be detected and used to support perception of egocentric distance that is precise and accurate
    corecore