13 research outputs found

    Performance studies on different okra varieties and hybrids under arid climatic conditions of Rajasthan

    No full text
    An experiment entitled “Performance and genetic variability studies in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench)” was carried out during August 2019 to November 2019 at the Research farm, College of Agriculture, Jodhpur (Rajasthan). The experiment comprised of 12 varieties and hybrids of okra viz. ‘P-8’, ‘Pusa Bhindi-5’, ‘Samrat F1 Hybrid’, ‘Punjab Suhawani’, ‘Arka Nikita’, ‘Shakshi F1 Hybrid’, ‘Palam Komal’, ‘Kashi Kranti’, ‘Shakti F1 Hybrid’, ‘Arka Anamika’, ‘Kashi Pragati’ and ‘Laxmi F1 Hybrid’ and was laid out in Randomized Block Design with three replications. Significant differences were found amongst the varieties and hybrids of okra for the studied characters. The ‘Arka Anamika’ recorded the maximum number of branches per plant (2.80), stem diameter (17.10 mm), number of leaves per plant (69.06), number of fruit per plant (25.80), fruit yield per plant (319.78 g), fruit yield per plot (4.95 kg), estimated fruit yield per hectare (122.30 q). The ‘Palam Komal’ recorded the maximum plant height (139.73) and numbers of nodes on main stem (30.80). The ‘Laxmi F1 Hybrid’ produced the largest leaves (156.86 cm2). The earliest first flower anthesis and 50% flowering and first picking were noted in ‘Kashi Pragati’ (38.67, 39.33 and 45.40 DAS, respectively). The ‘Pusa Bhindi-5’ recorded the maximum fruit length (12.36 cm). The ‘Samrat F1 Hybrid’ recorded the maximum fruit diameter (16.02 mm) and fruit weight (12.99 g). The maximum shelf life of fruit was recorded in ‘Kashi Kranti’ (4.47 Days). Five ridges per fruit were exhibited in all the okra varieties and hybrids. From the present investigation it can be concluded that okra variety ‘Arka Anamika’ performed best for various growth and yield traits under arid climatic conditions of Rajasthan

    Performance studies on different okra varieties and hybrids under arid climatic conditions of Rajasthan

    Full text link

    Post Operative Analgesia for Breast Surgery: Intercostal Nerve Block Versus Subcutaneous Infiltration.

    Full text link
    Abstract BackgroundPost operative analgesia is often underestimated in breast surgery resulting in long term sequelae. Opiates and epidural analgesia may produce complications and limits early rehabilitation. We compare the effects of intercostal nerve block with subcutaneous infiltration as post operative analgesia in breast surgery.MethodsAll patients who undergo breast surgery were assigned to two groups. They either receive intercostal nerve block or subcutaneous infiltration of 0.5% bupivacaine at the end of surgery. Pain score using visual analogue scale and the total amount of morphine consumption were recorded. Personnel taking measurements were kept blind.ResultsThere were 70 patients included in the study. Of these, three patients (two from Group A and one from Group B) were excluded because of post operative haematoma and drain related complications. 33 patients had intercostal nerve block and 34 patients received subcutaneous infiltration. The groups were comparable with respect to age and type of breast surgery. There were significant differences in the visual analogue pain scores at the early post operative period in the study group (P value of &amp;lt; 0.05).Table 1Pain ScoreGroup A Median (range)Group B Median (range)No. of patientsP valueWith in 4 hr of surgery2 (1-8)2 (1-9)330.7521st post op 8am2 (1-6)3 (1-8)330.0091st post op 6pm2 (1-6)2 (1-10)330.0112nd post op 8am1 (1-5)2 (1-8)120.2442nd post op 6pm1 (1-4)1.5 (1-5)110.2213rd post op 8am1 (1-4)1 (1-6)90.1373rd post op 6pm1 (1-7)2 (1-4)90.347 ConclusionsWe have demonstrated in our study that intercostal nerve block provides effective post operative analgesia in breast surgery patients. The accessibility of intercostal nerves in the operative field makes blockade feasible. Contrary to the misconception, incidence of pneumothorax is very rare. It should therefore be used more widely in view of its simplicity. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 5052.</jats:p
    corecore