Eosinophils Target Therapy for Severe Asthma: Critical Points

Asthma is a chronic and heterogeneous disease, which is defined as severe disease whenever it requires treatment with a high dose of inhaled corticosteroids plus a second controller and/or systemic corticosteroids to prevent it from becoming ‘‘uncontrolled’’ or if it remains ‘‘uncontrolled’’ despite this therapy. Severe asthma is a heterogeneous condition consisting of phenotypes such as eosinophilic asthma, which is characterized by sputum eosinophilia, associated with mild to moderate increase in blood eosinophil count, frequently adult-onset, and associated with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in half of the cases. Eosinophilic asthma is driven by T2 inflammation, characterized, among the others, by interleukin-5 production. IL-5 plays a key role in the differentiation, survival, migration, and activation of eosinophils, and it has become an appealing therapeutic target for eosinophilic asthma. In recent years two monoclonal antibodies (mepolizumab and reslizumab) directed against IL-5 and one monoclonal antibody directed against the alpha-subunit of the IL-5 receptor (benralizumab) have been developed. All these IL-5 target drugs have been shown to reduce the number of exacerbation in patients with severe asthma selected on the basis of peripheral blood eosinophil count. There are still a number of unresolved issues related to the anti-IL5 strategy in eosinophilic asthma, which are here reviewed. These issues include the effects of such therapy on airway obstruction and asthmatic symptoms, the level of baseline eosinophils that predicts a response to treatment, the relationship between blood and airway eosinophilia, and, perhaps most importantly, how to elucidate the pathogenetic role played by eosinophils in the individual patient with severe eosinophilic asthma

Sudden neck swelling with rash as late manifestation of COVID-19: a case report

Background: Although there are reports of otolaryngological symptoms and manifestations of CoronaVirus Disease 19 (COVID-19), there have been no documented cases of sudden neck swelling with rash in patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection described in literature. Case presentation: We report a case of a sudden neck swelling and rash likely due to late SARS-CoV-2 in a 64-year-old woman. The patient reported COVID-19 symptoms over the previous three weeks. Computed Tomography (CT) revealed a diffuse soft-tissue swelling and edema of subcutaneous tissue, hypodermis, and muscular and deep fascial planes. All the differential diagnoses were ruled out. Both the anamnestic history of the patient’s husband who had died of COVID-19 with and the collateral findings of pneumonia and esophageal wall edema suggested the association with COVID-19. This was confirmed by nasopharyngeal swab polymerase chain reaction. The patient was treated with lopinavir/ritonavir, hydroxychloroquine and piperacillin/tazobactam for 7 days. The neck swelling resolved in less than 24 h, while the erythema was still present up to two days later. The patient was discharged after seven days in good clinical condition and with a negative swab. Conclusion: Sudden neck swelling with rash may be a coincidental presentation, but, in the pandemic context, it is most likely a direct or indirect complication of COVID-19

Hypersensitivity Reactions to Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents: Update From an Allergist's Point of View

Background: The increasing use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has led to a rise in the administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs), accompanied by a growing number of reported adverse events (AEs). Objective: This review aims to provide an updated overview of hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to GBCAs, focusing on diagnostic and management strategies from an allergological perspective. Methods: We reviewed recent literature concerning the classification, clinical presentation, and pathophysiological mechanisms of HSRs to GBCAs. Particular attention was given to current recommendations for diagnosis, risk stratification, and prevention. Discussion: Adverse events to GBCAs are categorized into Type A reactions, which are dose-dependent and predictable, and Type B reactions, which are dose-independent hypersensitivity reactions. The latter may be allergic or non-allergic, presenting diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Conclusions: HSRs to GBCAs, though relatively rare, require careful evaluation and tailored management. An allergological work-up, including skin testing and graded challenges when appropriate, plays a critical role in the safe re-exposure of patients with prior reactions