40 research outputs found

    Cox proportional hazards deep neural network identifies peripheral blood complete remission to be at least equivalent to morphologic complete remission in predicting outcomes of patients treated with azacitidine - a prospective cohort study by the AGMT

    Get PDF
    The current gold standard of response assessment in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is morphologic complete remission (CR) and CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi), both of which require an invasive BM evaluation. Outside of clinical trials, BM evaluations are only performed in ~50% of patients during follow-up, pinpointing a clinical need for response endpoints that do not necessitate BM assessments. We define and validate a new response type termed "peripheral blood complete remission" (PB-CR) that can be determined from the differential blood count and clinical parameters without necessitating a BM assessment. We compared the predictive value of PB-CR with morphologic CR/CRi in 1441 non-selected, consecutive patients diagnosed with MDS (n = 522; 36.2%), CMML (n = 132; 9.2%), or AML (n = 787; 54.6%), included within the Austrian Myeloid Registry (aMYELOIDr; NCT04438889). Time-to-event analyses were adjusted for 17 covariates remaining in the final Cox proportional hazards (CPH) model. DeepSurv, a CPH neural network model, and permutation-based feature importance were used to validate results. 1441 patients were included. Adjusted median overall survival for patients achieving PB-CR was 22.8 months (95%CI 18.9-26.2) versus 10.4 months (95%CI 9.7-11.2) for those who did not; HR = 0.366 (95%CI 0.303-0.441; p < .0001). Among patients achieving CR, those additionally achieving PB-CR had a median adjusted OS of 32.6 months (95%CI 26.2-49.2) versus 21.7 months (95%CI 16.9-27.7; HR = 0.400 [95%CI 0.190-0.844; p = .0161]) for those who did not. Our deep neural network analysis-based findings from a large, prospective cohort study indicate that BM evaluations solely for the purpose of identifying CR/CRi can be omitted

    Long-term treatment of pulmonary hypertension with aerosolized iloprost

    Full text link
    Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), defined as elevated pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance, is an end-point of a variety of conditions. The only therapy that has been shown to improve both quality of life and survival is intravenous prostacyclin (prostaglandin I2(PGI2), epoprostenol).The effect of long-term aerosolized iloprost (Ilomedin, Schering, Berlin, Germany and Vienna, Austria), a stable prostacyclin analogue and potent vasodilator, on haemodynamics and functional status was investigated in 12 patients with severe pulmonary hypertension. Haemodynamic measurements and vasodilator testing by right heart catheterization were performed prior to and after long-term iloprost inhalation therapy.Haemodynamic improvement or increased exercise tolerance was not observed in any of the patients. After a mean±sd treatment period of 10±5 months, mean±sd pulmonary vascular resistance had increased from 11±3 Wood Units (mmHg·L−1·min) to 13±4 Wood Units, with unchanged arterial oxygen saturation (92±4%versus91±4%). Within the study period, three patients went into right heart failure and had to be placed on intravenous epoprostenol.The authors conclude that inhaled iloprost in addition to conventional therapy in the presently recommended dose of 100 µg·day−1delivered in 8–10 2 h portions, is not an efficient vasodilator therapy in severe pulmonary hypertension. It remains to be shown whether dose increases and/or combination protocols will be effective, or whether inhalation of iloprost may be safe for selected cases of pulmonary hypertension.</jats:p

    European Journal of Haematology / Adverse impact of a high CD4/CD8 ratio in the allograft may be overcome by methotrexate- but not mycophenolate- or post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based graft versus host disease prophylaxis

    No full text
    Introduction A high CD4/CD8 T cell ratio in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) allografts was observed to predict graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) but has not been comparatively examined in settings of various GVHD-prophylaxis regimens. Methods This retrospective monocentric study included all consecutive HSCT performed with peripheral blood stem cells between January 2000 and June 2021. The impact of the graft CD4/CD8 ratio was analyzed in three cohorts with different GVHD-prophylaxis platforms. Results In the cyclosporine/mycophenolate-mofetil (CSA/MMF) cohort (n = 294, HLA-matched HSCT), a high (>75th percentile) CD4/CD8 ratio was associated with increased overall mortality (HR: 1.56; p = .01), increased NRM (HR: 1.85; p = .01) and GVHD-associated mortality (HR: 2.13; p = .005). In the post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy)/tacrolimus/MMF cohort (n = 113, haploidentical-related or mismatched-unrelated HSCT), a high CD4/CD8 ratio was associated with increased overall mortality (HR 2.07; p = .04) and aGVHD3-4 (HR: 2.24; p = .02). By contrast, in the CSA/methotrexate (CSA/MTX) cohort (n = 185, HLA-matched HSCT) the CD4/CD8 ratio had no significant impact on any of the investigated endpoints. Conclusion A high CD4/CD8 ratio in the allograft has an adverse impact on GVHD and survival in CSA/MMF- and PTCy-based HSCT, while MTX-based prophylaxis may largely alleviate this important risk factor.Version of recor
    corecore