Nine-Week Versus One-Year Trastuzumab for Early Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2â € "Positive Breast Cancer: 10-Year Update of the ShortHER Phase III Randomized Trial

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned coprimary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical trial updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.We present the final analysis of the phase III noninferiority, randomized ShortHER trial comparing 9 weeks versus 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab with chemotherapy in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2â € "positive (HER2+) early breast cancer (BC). Women with HER2+ BC were randomly assigned to anthracycline-taxane combinations plus 1-year trastuzumab (arm A, long) or 9-week trastuzumab (arm B, short). Here, we report the second coprimary end point overall survival (OS), updated disease-free survival (DFS), and outcomes according to hormone receptor status, age, and nodal status. At a median follow-up of 9 years, 10-year DFS is 77% versus 78% in the long versus short arm, respectively. Ten-year OS is 89% versus 88% in the long versus short arm, respectively. 10-year DFS rates in the long versus short arm according to nodal status are N0 81% versus 85%; N1-3 77% versus 79%; and N4+ 63% versus 53%. Ten-year OS rates in long versus short arm according to nodal status are N0 89% versus 95%%; N1-3 92% versus 89%; and N4+ 84% versus 64%. The updated analysis of the ShortHER trial shows that 1-year trastuzumab is the standard treatment for patients with HER2+ early BC as noninferiority cannot be claimed. However, numerically, the differences for the patients at low or intermediate risk (N0/N1-3) is negligible, while patients with N4+ have a clear benefit with 1-year trastuzumab

The Still Bay points of Apollo 11 Rock Shelter, Namibia : an inter-regional perspective

Abstract: Dating to roughly 80,000 to 70,000 years ago, components of the Still Bay technocomplex of southern Africa and their potential behavioural implications have been widely discussed. Stone points with invasive retouch, as defined over 90 years ago by Goodwin and van Riet Lowe, serve as markers for Still Bay assemblages, yet many Still Bay sites remain undated and comprehensive, comparable sets of data for their point assemblages remain unpublished. Much of the Middle Stone Age at the site of Apollo 11 in Namibia was undated until 2010, when a potential Still Bay component was announced. Although a Still Bay assemblage at Apollo 11 would represent the most northwesterly and inland expression of this technocomplex, its points have never been fully analysed. This paper presents their morphometric data and an interpretation of point-production strategies. These results are then compared with data obtained for two South African sites: Hollow Rock Shelter in the Western Cape and Umhlatuzana in KwaZulu-Natal. This comparison demonstrates that whereas there are no statistically significant differences in the morphometric data sets between the three sites, there are both similarities and differences in point-production strategies, cross-section shapes and the use of raw materials for knapping. It is suggested that these similarities and variations represent aspects of how knowledge-transfer systems and knapping conventions were followed on both intra-regional and inter-regional scales

Safety and efficacy analysis of neoadjuvant pertuzumab, trastuzumab and standard chemotherapy for HER2–positive early breast cancer: real–world data from NeoPowER study

Background The addition of pertuzumab (P) to trastuzumab (H) and standard chemotherapy (CT) as neoadjuvant treatment (NaT) for patients with HER2 + breast cancer (BC), has shown to increase the pathological complete response (pCR) rate, without main safety concerns. The aim of NeoPowER trial is to evaluate safety and efficacy of P + H + CT in a real-world population. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of stage II-III, HER2 + BC patients treated with NaT: who received P + H + CT (neopower group) in 5 Emilia Romagna institutions were compared with an historical group who received H + CT (control group). The primary endpoint was the safety, secondary endpoints were pCR rate, DRFS and OS and their correlation to NaT and other potential variables. Results 260 patients were included, 48% received P + H + CT, of whom 44% was given anthraciclynes as part of CT, compared to 83% in the control group. The toxicity profile was similar, excluding diarrhea more frequent in the neopower group (20% vs. 9%). Three patients experienced significant reductions in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), all receiving anthracyclines. The pCR rate was 46% (P + H + CT) and 40% (H + CT) (p = 0.39). The addition of P had statistically correlation with pCR only in the patients receiving anthra-free regimens (OR = 3.05,p = 0.047). Preoperative use of anthracyclines (OR = 1.81,p = 0.03) and duration of NaT (OR = 1.18,p = 0.02) were statistically related to pCR. 12/21 distant-relapse events and 14/17 deaths occurred in the control group. Patients who achieve pCR had a significant increase in DRFS (HR = 0.23,p = 0.009). Conclusions Adding neoadjuvant P to H and CT is safe. With the exception of diarrhea, rate of adverse events of grade > 2 did not differ between the two groups. P did not increase the cardiotoxicity when added to H + CT, nevertheless in our population all cardiac events occurred in patients who received anthracycline-containing regimens. Not statistically significant, higher pCR rate is achievable in patients receiving neoadjuvant P + H + CT. The study did not show a statistically significant correlation between the addition of P and long-term outcomes

Adjuvant chemotherapy in average-risk adult medulloblastoma patients improves survival: a long term study

Abstract Background Medulloblastoma is extremely rare in adults. The role of chemotherapy for average-risk adult patients remains controversial. Surgery and radiotherapy provide a significant disease control and a good prognosis, but about 25% of average-risk patients have a relapse and die because of disease progression. No data in average-risk adult patients are available to compareradiotherapy alone and radiotherapyfollowed byadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods We analyzed 48 average-risk patients according to Chang classification diagnosed from 1988 to 2016. Results Median age was 29 years (range 16–61). Based on histological subtypes, 15 patients (31.3%) had classic, 15 patients (31.3%) had desmoplastic, 5 patients (10.4%) had extensive nodularity and 2 patients (4.2%) had large cells/anaplastic medulloblastoma. Twenty-four patients (50%) received adjuvant radiotherapy alone and 24 (50%) received radiotherapy and chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 12.5 years, we found that chemotherapyincreases progression-free survival (PFS-15 82.3 ± 8.0% in patients treated with radiotherapy and chemotherapyvs. 38.5% ± 13.0% in patients treated with radiotherapy alone p = 0.05) and overall survival (OS-15 89.3% ± 7.2% vs. 52.0% ± 13.1%, p = 0.02). Among patients receiving chemotherapy, the reported grade ≥ 3 adverse events were: 9 cases of neutropenia (6 cases of G3 neutropenia [25%] and 3 cases of G4 neutropenia [13%]), 1 case of G3 thrombocytopenia (4%) and 2 cases of G3 nausea (8%). Conclusions Our study with a long follow up period suggests that adding adjuvant chemotherapy to radiotherapy might improve PFS and OS in average-risk adult medulloblastoma patients. </jats:sec

Third-line therapy in recurrent glioblastoma: is it another chance for bevacizumab?

Background: Standard glioblastoma therapy is long-lasting. Among second-line therapy, choices could be bevacizumab and nitrosoureas depending on National Agencies approval. There is no consensus on 3rd line therapy or clinical trials specifically designed for this setting. Methods: We reviewed our institutional database on all consecutive patients who received 3rd line therapy for glioblastoma. Results: Data on 168 out of 1337 (12.6%) glioblastoma patients who underwent 3rd line therapy treatment were collected. Third line treatments were bevacizumab or chemotherapy (nitrosourea, temozolomide or carboplatin plus etoposide). Median progression free survival was 2.9&nbsp;months and median survival time was 6.6 months from the start of 3rd line therapy. Bevacizumab significantly improved progression-free survival (4.7 vs. 2.6&nbsp;months, p =.020) and survival from 3rd line start (8.0 vs. 6.0&nbsp;months, p =.014) in respect to chemotherapy. Toxicity of grade ≥ 3 occurred in 13.7% of patients. In multivariate analysis, survival in 3rd line treatment depends on MGMT methylation (p =.006) and treatment with Bevacizumab (p =.011). Conclusions: Third line therapy in selected glioblastoma patients may be feasible and well tolerated. Bevacizumab improved outcome in 3rd line in respect to chemotherapy

Abstract OT3-05-01: Three-monthly dynamic evaluation of CEA and CA15-3 (followed by 18-FDG PET) vs usual practice in the follow-up of early breast cancer (BC) patients (pts): A prospective randomized trial (KRONOS-patient-oriented new surveillance study, Italy)

Abstract Background: Current guidelines for BC surveillance in asymptomatic pts recommend annual mammography and periodical physical examination. These recommendations arise from two trials conducted in the 1980's: since then no other randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been conducted on BC follow-up. However our knowledge on BC biology, diagnosis of metastases and treatment has improved. The aim of this prospective RCT is to verify if the serial measurement of CEA and CA15.3 (followed by 18-FDG PET) can anticipate the diagnosis of breast cancer recurrence compared to control arm. If this intermediate end-point will be met a subsequent extension trial will investigate the impact of the earlier diagnosis of distant metastases on survival. Methods: Pts diagnosed with stage I-III BC, who underwent adequate surgery are eligible. Special histologies and low-risk cases according to St. Gallen criteria are excluded. We will include pts at the beginning of the follow-up after the conclusion of primary treatment (cohort 1), and pts that have concluded without relapse the first 5 years of follow-up (cohort 2). Eligible pts will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to follow-up according to local practice (control arm) or to three-monthly serial dosing of CEA and CA15.3 and subsequent imaging studies (18-FDG PET) only in case of an increase of CEA and/or CA 15.3 greater than a critical difference (CEA +100% and/or CA15.3 +75%) compared to baseline (experimental arm). The following stratification factors will be used: node negative vs positive, HER2 negative vs positive, ER positive vs negative. Eight-hundred pts will be enrolled over 3 years. For such a calculation, we made the assumption of a 20% 5-year incidence of relapse. The target reduction of 3 months in restricted mean survival time (RMST) between the two arms implies a median time of diagnostic anticipation, conditional on having breast cancer recurrence, of 10 months. The follow-up will continue until 10 years from surgery. The first patient was enrolled on 23rd October 2014, up to now 434 pts have been enrolled. The present trial was approved by the Ethical Commitee of S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital and is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02261389). Citation Format: Zamagni C, Gion M, Mariani L, Stieber P, Quercia S, Rubino D, Bernardi A, Cacciari N, Fini A, Lenzi M, Minichillo S, Pizzirani C, Pagliaro M, Tomasini S, Barbieri E. Three-monthly dynamic evaluation of CEA and CA15-3 (followed by 18-FDG PET) vs usual practice in the follow-up of early breast cancer (BC) patients (pts): A prospective randomized trial (KRONOS-patient-oriented new surveillance study, Italy) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-05-01.</jats:p