26 research outputs found

    Mesonephric-Like Adenocarcinomas a Rare Tumor: The Importance of Diagnosis

    Get PDF
    Mesonephric-like adenocarcinomas (MLA) are rare neoplasms that arise in the uterine body and ovary and have been added to the World Health Organisation’s recent 2020 classification of female genital cancers. The pathogenesis of MLA is unknown and it remains debated whether they represent mesonephric carcinomas (Wolffian) arising in the endometrium/ovary or endometrioid carcinomas (Müllerian) closely mimicking mesonephric carcinomas. Here we report the case of a 57-year-old woman with an initial misdiagnosis of endometrioid adenocarcinoma on diagnostic biopsy. The patient came to our clinical evaluation for the appearance of menometrorrhagia complicated by anemia for several months. Therefore, she underwent pelvic echo-flowmetry, with indication for diagnostic hysteroscopy with endometrial biopsy, which yielded a positive result for endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma. Following staging CT scan and targeted examinations on pulmonary findings, the patient underwent surgery with surprise of definitive diagnosis deponent for endometrial MLA. Our intention is to establish a brief review of the scientific evidence in the literature and the tools available for a correct histological diagnosis, in the light of the scant anatomopathological evidence. Our question gives rise to the motive for the publication: is immunohistochemistry the right way to resolve the diagnostic error at histology, which is usually the only source of diagnostic certainty? This case is intended to alert of diagnostic error that risked having the patient treated as a neoplasm with a favorable prognosis and low degree of aggressiveness instead of for a very aggressive and poor prognosis tumor such as MLA

    The mode of delivery and the risk of vertical transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1

    No full text

    Is there a role for the sentinel lymph node in endometrial atypical hyperplasia? Insights from an ESGO-accredited Institution

    No full text
    Introduction: This study investigates the outcomes of patients with premalignant endometrial findings on biopsy who underwent hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node (SLN) excision and were subsequently diagnosed with endometrial cancer (EC). It aims to highlight the role of nodal assessment in guiding postoperative treatment strategies. Additionally, the study compares surgery complication rates between patients who underwent SLN mapping and those who did not. Methods: This retrospective, observational, single-center study was conducted at Udine Hospital between April 2021 and July 2024. 63 patients diagnosed with atypical hyperplasia on endometrial biopsy who underwent hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, with or without SLN mapping, were included. All procedures were performed using minimally invasive surgery. Results: Of the 63 patients, 35 (55.6 %) had confirmed atypical hyperplasia on uterine pathology, while 23 (36.5 %) were diagnosed with EC on final pathology. Of the patients who underwent SLN mapping, 18 (43 %) received a final diagnosis of EC and were accurately staged and treated accordingly. In contrast, within the group of patients treated without SLN mapping, 5 (24 %) were diagnosed with EC on final pathology and didn't receive proper staging. No nodal metastases were found in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference in operating time and complication rates between the two groups (with or without SLN mapping), further supporting the procedure's safety. Conclusions: This study's findings underscore the significance of incorporating SLN mapping into hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy for patients with atypical hyperplasia. This approach enhances accurate staging for patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer on final pathology

    Application of novel algorithm on a retrospective series to implement the molecular classification for endometrial cancer

    No full text
    Introduction: The study aimed to validate the Betella algorithm, focusing on molecular analyses exclusively for endometrial cancer patients, where molecular classification alters risk assessment based on ESGO/ESTRO/ESP 2020 guidelines. Materials and methods: Conducted between March 2021 and March 2023, the retrospective research involved endometrial cancer patients undergoing surgery and comprehensive molecular analyses. These included p53 and mismatch repair proteins immunohistochemistry, as well as DNA sequencing for POLE exonuclease domain. We applied the Betella algorithm to our population and evaluated the proportion of patients in which the molecular analysis changed the risk class attribution. Results: Out of 102 patients, 97 % obtained complete molecular analyses. The cohort exhibited varying molecular classifications: 10.1 % as POLE ultra-mutated, 30.3 % as mismatch repair deficient, 11.1 % as p53 abnormal, and 48.5 % as non-specified molecular classification. Multiple classifiers were present in 3 % of cases. Integrating molecular classification into risk group calculation led to risk group migration in 11.1 % of patients: 7 moved to lower risk classes due to POLE mutations, while 4 shifted to higher risk due to p53 alterations. Applying the Betella algorithm, we can spare the POLE sequencing in 65 cases (65.7 %) and p53 immunochemistry in 17 cases (17.2 %). Conclusion: In conclusion, we externally validated the Betella algorithm in our population. The application of this new proposed algorithm enables assignment of the proper risk class and, consequently, the appropriate indication for adjuvant treatment, allowing for the rationalization of the resources that can be allocated otherwise, not only for the benefit of settings with low resources, but of all settings in general

    Exploring the cost-effectiveness of the OSNA method for patients facing endometrial cancer: Insights from a single-institution experience

    No full text
    Objective: The one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) method has emerged as a potential alternative to ultrastaging for diagnosing lymph node metastasis. This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of the OSNA technique compared to ultrastaging for detecting SLN metastasis in patients with early-stage endometrial cancer (EC). Methods: This retrospective, observational, single-center study included 30 patients with EC who underwent surgical treatment. SLN mapping was performed using an intracervical injection of indocyanine green. SLNs were analyzed and classified as negative, as having isolated tumor cells, micrometastases, or macrometastases. The study evaluated and quantified the costs of the OSNA and ultrastaging procedures in euros. Results: A total of 54 lymph nodes were analyzed using both the OSNA and ultrastaging methods. Concordant negativity was identified in 48 cases (89 %), while micrometastases were detected concordantly in 1 case (1.8 %). The cost for a single ultrastaging lymph node analysis, including immunohistochemistry, is approximately € 250, with a total processing time of 2 days. The cost for a single OSNA analysis is approximately € 236, boasting a significantly shorter processing time of 30–40 min. While materials and staff costs are comparable between both techniques, considering time-related expenses, the OSNA method proves to be more cost-effective than ultrastaging (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The OSNA method demonstrates diagnostic accuracy comparable to histopathological examination in detecting lymph node metastases, reinforcing its reliability for lymph node assessment in patients with EC. Our cost analysis reveals that the OSNA method is more cost-effective than ultrastaging when time-related expenses are considered
    corecore