Automated measurement of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate: method validation and comparison

Abstract Background Development of automated analyzers for erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) has imposed the need for extensive validation prior to their implementation in routine practice, to ensure comparability with the reference Westergren method. The aim of our study was to perform the analytical validation of two automated ESR analyzers, the Ves-Matic Cube 200 and the TEST1. Methods Validation was performed according to the recent International Council for Standardization in Hematology recommendations and included determination of intrarun and inter-run precision, assessment of sample carryover, hemolysis interference, sensitivity to fibrinogen, method comparison with the gold standard Westergren method and stability test. Results The highest intrarun imprecision was obtained for the low ESR range (33.5% for Ves-Matic Cube; 37.3% for TEST1) while inter-run coefficients of variation on three levels were much better for the TEST1 (0%, 2% and 1.2%) compared to the Ves-Matic Cube 200 on two levels (24.9% and 5.8%). Both Ves-Matic Cube 200 and TEST1 showed no statistically significant difference when compared with Westergren. Bland-Altman analysis yielded overall insignificant mean biases for all comparisons, but a wider dispersion of results and 95% limits of agreement for comparisons including the Ves-Matic Cube 200. Carryover was considered insignificant, while hemolysis had a negative effect on all assessed ESR methods. The highest sensitivity to fibrinogen was observed for the Ves-Matic Cube 200, followed by Westergren and the least sensitive was the TEST1. Conclusions The obtained results proved the analytical validity of the TEST1 and the Ves-Matic Cube 200, and high comparability with the gold standard Westergren method, showing obvious improvements in standardization of ESR methods. </jats:sec

Ves-Matic CUBE 200: is modified Westergren method for erythrocyte sedimentation rate a valid alternative to the gold standard?

Ves-Matic CUBE 200 is an automated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) analyser based on the modified Westergren principle of measurement. In this study, we aimed to assess its analytical performance following the key points addressed by the International Council for Standardization in Haematology and the comparability with the gold standard Westergren method. Comparison of the two methods yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.852, no significant bias and a small constant difference between compared results. Intrarun coefficients of variation (CV) ranged from 2.2% to 22.2%, the higher being for lower ESR values, while inter-run CVs were 19.7% for the normal range and 3.0% for the abnormal range. This study proved the analytical validity of the Ves-Matic CUBE 200 and its high comparability with the Westergren method, showing obvious improvements in the technology applied for automated determination of ESR and a valuable step forward in standardisation of ESR methods.</jats:p

Evolution over Time of Leg Length Discrepancy in Patients with Syndromic and Isolated Lateralized Overgrowth

Objective: To provide information on evolution over time of leg length discrepancy in patients with syndromic and isolated lateralized overgrowth. Study design: This retrospective study investigates leg length discrepancy longitudinally in 105 patients with lateralized overgrowth either isolated (n = 37) or associated with Beckwith-Wiedemann spectrum (n = 56) or PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum (n = 12). Discrepancy was measured by standard methods and categorized as minor, mild, severe, and critical, based on the thresholds of 1, 2 and 5, respectively. Results: The period of observation from diagnosis was 1.7 ± 2.6 to 9.0 ± 6.0 years. Leg length discrepancy was 11.0 ± 7.2 mm at diagnosis and 17.1 ± 14.4 mm at last visit. Both final leg length discrepancy and change over time were correlated with discrepancy at diagnosis (r2 = 0.45, P &lt; .001 and r2 = 0.05, P = .019, respectively). Among minor leg length discrepancy at diagnosis, 47.5% remained minor, 40.0% become mild, and 12.5% severe. Among patients with discrepancy classified as severe at diagnosis, 84.6% remained severe and 15.4% evolved to critical. The isolated lateralized overgrowth group showed a milder evolution over time compared with Beckwith-Wiedemann spectrum and PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum groups. Among patients with Beckwith-Wiedemann, those with paternal chromosome 11 uniparental disomy had more severe leg length discrepancy at diagnosis and evolution over time. Conclusions: Leg length discrepancy associated with isolated or syndromic lateralized overgrowth tends to worsen with growth and correlates with discrepancy at first observation. Among the genotypic groups, isolated lateralized overgrowth tends to have a milder evolution, whereas Beckwith-Wiedemann spectrum predisposes to a more severe outcome, especially if associated with paternal chromosome 11 uniparental disomy genotype

La medicina di laboratorio: Gli Specialisti di domani

[Laboratory Medicine: specialists of tomorrow] Laboratory Medicine rides the wave of technological progress, the metamorphosis of information systems and data management. The Young Specialist is not a mere observer, but rather takes a leading role in this change, taking advantage of the opportunities offered by “omics” technologies, capturing new ideas and innovative stimuli that lead to a new concept of work and research oriented to health and prevention. Thanks to the support of international web platforms, training and exchange programs supported by the International Scientific Societies and Federations that favor professional and scientific growth, Young Scientists work in a global context. In this scenario, the SIBioC Young Scientists Study Group, with the auspices of SIBioC, EFLM and IFCC, organized a meeting on "Laboratory Medicine: Specialists of tomorrow" with the aim of discussing and highlighting some of the most important challenges, such as technological progress, training and internationalization of young people. Finally, the future of laboratory medicine looks at a multidisciplinary approach that leads to integrated diagnosis, identification of the frail patient, the use of the Point of Care Testing as an indispensable tool in crisis areas, making the dialogue between physician and laboratory specialist a fundamental step for the diagnosis and treatment with the final aim of a better outcome for the patient