Impact of the early phase of the COVID pandemic on cancer treatment delivery and the quality of cancer care: a scoping review and conceptual model

AbstractBackgroundThe disruption of health services due to coronavirus disease (COVID) is expected to dramatically alter cancer care; however, the implications for care quality and outcomes remain poorly understood.ObjectiveWe undertook a scoping review to evaluate what is known in the literature about how cancer treatment has been modified as a result of the COVID pandemic in patients receiving treatment for solid tumours, and what domains of quality of care are most impacted.MethodsCitations were retrieved from MEDLINE and EMBASE (from 1 January 2019 to 28 October 2020), utilizing search terms grouped by the key concept (oncology, treatment, treatment modifications and COVID). Articles were excluded if they dealt exclusively with management of COVID-positive patients, modifications to cancer screening, diagnosis or supportive care or were not in English. Articles reporting on guidelines, consensus statements, recommendations, literature reviews, simulations or predictive models, or opinions in the absence of accompanying information on experience with treatment modifications in practice were excluded. Treatment modifications derived from the literature were stratified by modality (surgery, systemic therapy (ST) and radiotherapy) and thematically grouped. To understand what areas of quality were most impacted, modifications were mapped against the Institute of Medicine’s quality domains. Where reported, barriers and facilitators were abstracted and thematically grouped to understand drivers of treatment modifications. Findings were synthesized into a logic model to conceptualize the inter-relationships between different modifications, as well as their downstream impacts on outcomes.ResultsIn the 87 retained articles, reductions in outpatients visits (26.4%) and delays/deferrals were commonly reported across all treatment modalities (surgery: 50%; ST: 55.8% and radiotherapy: 56.7%), as were reductions in surgical capacity (57.1%), alternate systemic regimens with longer treatment intervals or use of oral agents (19.2%) and the use of hypofractionated radiotherapy regimens (40.0%). Delivery of effective, timely and equitable care was the quality domains found to be the most impacted. The most commonly reported facilitator of maintaining cancer care delivery levels was the shift to virtual models of care (62.1%), while patient-initiated deferrals and cancellations (34.8%), often due to fear of contracting COVID (60.9%), was a commonly reported barrier.ConclusionsAs it will take a considerable amount of time for the cancer system to resume capacity and adjust models of care in response to the pandemic, these treatment delays and modifications will likely be prolonged and will negatively impact the quality of care and patient outcomes.</jats:sec

Recovery of a quality improvement project during the COVID pandemic.

246 Background: Prior to COVID we undertook a QI project with the aim improving the documentation of a best possible medication history (BPMH) or medication reconciliation (MedRec) for patients initiating systemic therapy (ST) in ambulatory oncology, where care spans multiple providers and patients may be at increased risk of adverse drug events. While initial improvements were realized (16.7% and 3.9% increases for BPMH and MedRec, respectively), completion rates returned to baseline following the start of the COVID pandemic. Methods: Guided by the four-phase Quality Implementation Framework we sought to recover implementation of MedRec. We initially undertook a purposeful re-examination of the MedRec process (Phase 1) to identify barriers to conducting MedRec during COVID. This guided the tailored selection of Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) implementation strategies utilized during the successive phase of the project. During each phase the proportion of patients with documented BPMH or MedRec within 30 days of initiating ST out of those eligible was calculated. Results: Major barriers to conducting MedRec during COVID included reduced resources (time, human resources and physical resources), loss of dedicated staff, and change in workflow/ clinical models brought on by the introduction of virtual care. This informed our strategy to improve capacity to conduct MedRec (Phase 2) through the development and distribution of educational materials, revisions of professional roles, and creation of a new dedicated clinical team consisting of existing modified duty nurses to conduct MedRec. To support ongoing implementation (Phase 3), additional implementation strategies included the staged implementation scale-up, conduct of educational meetings/ outreach visits, facilitation, and provision of clinical supervision. The impact of each phase of implementation on BPMH and MedRec completion rates is summarized in Table. Conclusions: Recovery of a quality improvement intervention during COVID was realized through the utilization of a structured, implementation process model approach to identify and address barriers to implementation. Future work will focus on improvement of MedRec completion rates by clinicians, and on embedding processes into practice (Phase 4) to support sustainability of the intervention.[Table: see text] </jats:p

LAMA2&amp;nbsp;and LOXL4 Are Candidate FSGS&amp;nbsp;Genes

Abstract Background: Focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a histologic pattern of injury that characterizes a wide spectrum of diseases. Many genetic causes have been identified in FSGS but even in families with comprehensive testing, a significant proportion remain unexplained. Results: In one FSGS family with 6 affected relatives, we performed linkage analysis and whole exome sequencing (WES). Linkage analysis narrowed the disease gene(s) to within 3% of the genome. Whole exome sequencing revealed 5 heterozygous rare variants, which were sequenced in 11 relatives where DNA was available. Two of these variants, in LAMA2 and LOXL4, remained as candidates after segregation analysis and encode extracellular matrix proteins of the glomerulus. Renal biopsies showed classic segmental sclerosis/hyalinosis lesion on a background of mild mesangial hypercellularity. Examination of basement membranes with electron microscopy showed regions of dense mesangial matrix in one individual and wider glomerular basement membrane (GBM) thickness in two individuals compared to historic control averages. Conclusions: Based on our findings, we postulate that the additive effect of digenic inheritance of heterozygous variants in LAMA2 and LOXL4 leads to adult-onset FSGS. Limitations to our study includes the absence of functional characterization to support pathogenicity. Alternatively, identification of additional FSGS cases with suspected deleterious variants in LAMA2 and LOXL4 will provide more evidence for disease causality. Thus, our report will be of interest to clinicians and genetic groups as sequencing in renal disease becomes more widespread. Overall, our results provide an example of more complicated genetic inheritance patterns that underlie glomerular disorders in unexplained families.</jats:p

LAMA2 and LOXL4 are candidate FSGS genes

Abstract Background Focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a histologic pattern of injury that characterizes a wide spectrum of diseases. Many genetic causes have been identified in FSGS but even in families with comprehensive testing, a significant proportion remain unexplained. Methods In a family with adult-onset autosomal dominant FSGS, linkage analysis was performed in 11 family members followed by whole exome sequencing (WES) in 3 affected relatives to identify candidate genes. Results Pathogenic variants in known nephropathy genes were excluded. Subsequently, linkage analysis was performed and narrowed the disease gene(s) to within 3% of the genome. WES identified 5 heterozygous rare variants, which were sequenced in 11 relatives where DNA was available. Two of these variants, in LAMA2 and LOXL4, remained as candidates after segregation analysis and encode extracellular matrix proteins of the glomerulus. Renal biopsies showed classic segmental sclerosis/hyalinosis lesion on a background of mild mesangial hypercellularity. Examination of basement membranes with electron microscopy showed regions of dense mesangial matrix in one individual and wider glomerular basement membrane (GBM) thickness in two individuals compared to historic control averages. Conclusions Based on our findings, we postulate that the additive effect of digenic inheritance of heterozygous variants in LAMA2 and LOXL4 leads to adult-onset FSGS. Limitations to our study includes the absence of functional characterization to support pathogenicity. Alternatively, identification of additional FSGS cases with suspected deleterious variants in LAMA2 and LOXL4 will provide more evidence for disease causality. Thus, our report will be of benefit to the renal community as sequencing in renal disease becomes more widespread. </jats:sec

LAMA2 and LOXL4 are candidate FSGS genes

Abstract Background Focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a histologic pattern of injury that characterizes a wide spectrum of diseases. Many genetic causes have been identified in FSGS but even in families with comprehensive testing, a significant proportion remain unexplained. Methods In a family with adult-onset autosomal dominant FSGS, linkage analysis was performed in 11 family members followed by whole exome sequencing (WES) in 3 affected relatives to identify candidate genes. Results Pathogenic variants in known nephropathy genes were excluded. Subsequently, linkage analysis was performed and narrowed the disease gene(s) to within 3% of the genome. WES identified 5 heterozygous rare variants, which were sequenced in 11 relatives where DNA was available. Two of these variants, in LAMA2 and LOXL4, remained as candidates after segregation analysis and encode extracellular matrix proteins of the glomerulus. Renal biopsies showed classic segmental sclerosis/hyalinosis lesion on a background of mild mesangial hypercellularity. Examination of basement membranes with electron microscopy showed regions of dense mesangial matrix in one individual and wider glomerular basement membrane (GBM) thickness in two individuals compared to historic control averages. Conclusions Based on our findings, we postulate that the additive effect of digenic inheritance of heterozygous variants in LAMA2 and LOXL4 leads to adult-onset FSGS. Limitations to our study includes the absence of functional characterization to support pathogenicity. Alternatively, identification of additional FSGS cases with suspected deleterious variants in LAMA2 and LOXL4 will provide more evidence for disease causality. Thus, our report will be of benefit to the renal community as sequencing in renal disease becomes more widespread

Implementation of medication reconciliation in outpatient cancer care

Background Medication reconciliation (MedRec) is a process where providers work with patients to document and communicate comprehensive medication information by creating a complete medication list (best possible medication history (BPMH)) then reconciling it against what patient is actually taking to identify potential issues such as drug-drug interactions. We undertook an environmental scan of current MedRec practices in outpatient cancer care to inform a quality improvement project at our centre with the aim of 30% of patients having a BPMH or MedRec within 30 days of initiating treatment with systemic therapy.Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders from 21 cancer centres across Canada, probing on current policies, and barriers and facilitators to MedRec. Guided by the findings of the scan, we then undertook a quality improvement project at our cancer centre, comprising six iterative improvement cycles.Results Most institutions interviewed had a process in place for collecting a BPMH (81%) and targeted patients initiating systemic therapy (59%); however, considerable practice variation was noted and completion of full MedRec was uncommon. Lack of resources, high patient volumes, lack of a common medical record spanning institutions and settings which limits access to medication records from external institutions and community pharmacies were identified as significant barriers. Despite navigating challenges related to the COVID-19 pandemic, we achieved 26.6% of eligible patients with a documented BPMH. However, uptake of full MedRec remained low whereby 4.7% of patients had a documented MedRec.Conclusions Realising improvements to completion of MedRec in outpatient cancer care is possible but takes considerable time and iteration as the process is complex. Resource allocation and information sharing remain major barriers which need to be addressed in order to observe meaningful improvements in MedRec

The Impact of the Pandemic on the Quality of Colorectal and Anal Cancer Care, and 2-Year Clinical Outcomes

We undertook a retrospective study to compare the quality of care delivered to a cohort of newly diagnosed adults with colon, rectal or anal cancer during the early phase of COVID-19 (02/20–12/20) relative to the same period in the year prior (the comparator cohort), and examine the impact of the pandemic on 2-year disease progression and all-cause mortality. We observed poorer performance on a number of quality measures, such as approximately three times as many patients in the COVID-19 cohort experienced 30-day post-surgical readmission (10.5% vs. 3.6%; SD:0.27). Despite these differences, we observed no statistically significant adjusted associations between COVID-19 and time to either all-cause mortality (HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.61–1.27, p = 0.50) or disease progression (HR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.82–1.64, p = 0.41). However, there was a substantial reduction in new patient consults during the early phase of COVID-19 (12.2% decrease), which appeared to disproportionally impact patients who traditionally experience sociodemographic disparities in access to care, given that the COVID-19 cohort skewed younger and there were fewer patients from neighborhoods with the highest Housing and Dwelling, ands Age and Labour Force marginalization quintiles. Future work is needed to understand the more downstream effects of COVID-19 related changes on cancer care to inform planning for future disruptions in care

sj-docx-3-jpx-10.1177_23743735231223849 - Supplemental material for Patient Perceptions of the Impact of the COVID Pandemic on the Quality of Their Gastrointestinal Cancer Care

Supplemental material, sj-docx-3-jpx-10.1177_23743735231223849 for Patient Perceptions of the Impact of the COVID Pandemic on the Quality of Their Gastrointestinal Cancer Care by Melanie Powis, Rinku Sutradhar, Saidah Hack, Shabbir M.H. Alibhai, Alejandro Berlin, Simron Singh and Monika K. Krzyzanowska in Journal of Patient Experience</p

Feasibility and Effectiveness of Self-Management Education and Coaching on Patient Activation for Managing Cancer Treatment Toxicities

Background: Poorly managed cancer treatment toxicities negatively impact quality of life, but little research has examined patient activation in self-management (SM) early in cancer treatment. Methods: We undertook a pilot randomized trial to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effectiveness of the SMARTCare (Self-Management and Activation to Reduce Treatment Toxicities) intervention. This intervention included an online SM education program (I-Can Manage) plus 5 sessions of telephone cancer coaching in patients initiating systemic therapy for lymphoma or colorectal or lung cancer at 3 centers in Ontario, Canada, relative to a usual care control group. Patient-reported outcomes included patient activation (Patient Activation Measure [PAM]), symptom or emotional distress, self-efficacy, and quality of life. Descriptive statistics and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to examine changes over time (baseline and at 2, 4, and 6 months) within and between groups. We used general estimating equations to compare outcomes between groups over time. The intervention group completed an acceptability survey and qualitative interviews. Results: Of 90 patients approached, 62 (68.9%) were enrolled. Mean age of the sample was 60.5 years. Most patients were married (77.1%), were university educated (71%), had colorectal cancer (41.9%) or lymphoma (42.0%), and had stage III or IV disease (75.8%). Attrition was higher in the intervention group than among control subjects (36.7% vs 25%, respectively). Adherence to I-Can Manage was low; 30% of intervention patients completed all 5 coaching calls, but 87% completed ≥1. Both the continuous PAM total score (P&lt;.001) and categorical PAM levels (3/4 vs 1/2) (P=.002) were significantly improved in the intervention group. Conclusions: SM education and coaching early during cancer treatment may improve patient activation, but a larger trial is needed. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03849950</jats:p

sj-docx-2-jpx-10.1177_23743735231223849 - Supplemental material for Patient Perceptions of the Impact of the COVID Pandemic on the Quality of Their Gastrointestinal Cancer Care

Supplemental material, sj-docx-2-jpx-10.1177_23743735231223849 for Patient Perceptions of the Impact of the COVID Pandemic on the Quality of Their Gastrointestinal Cancer Care by Melanie Powis, Rinku Sutradhar, Saidah Hack, Shabbir M.H. Alibhai, Alejandro Berlin, Simron Singh and Monika K. Krzyzanowska in Journal of Patient Experience</p