Burkitt lymphoma research in East Africa : highlights from the 9th African organization for research and training in cancer conference held in Durban, South Africa in 2013

A one-day workshop on Burkitt lymphoma (BL) was held at the 9th African Organization for Research and Training in Cancer (AORTIC) conference in 2013 in Durban, South Africa. The workshop featured 15 plenary talks by delegates representing 13 institutions that either fund or implement research on BL targeting AORTIC delegates primarily interested in pediatric oncology. The main outcomes of the meeting were improved sharing of knowledge and experience about ongoing epidemiologic BL research, BL treatment in different settings, the role of cancer registries in cancer research, and opportunities for African scientists to publish in scientific journals. The idea of forming a consortium of BL to improve coordination, information sharing, accelerate discovery, dissemination, and translation of knowledge and to build capacity, while reducing redundant efforts was discussed. Here, we summarize the presentations and discussions from the workshop

Evaluation of sit-stand workstations in an office setting: A randomised controlled trial

Background: Excessive sitting time is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease mortality and morbidity independent of physical activity. This aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a sit-stand workstation on sitting time, and vascular, metabolic and musculoskeletal outcomes in office workers, and to investigate workstation acceptability and feasibility. Methods: A two-arm, parallel-group, individually randomised controlled trial was conducted in one organisation. Participants were asymptomatic full-time office workers aged ≥18 years. Each participant in the intervention arm had a sit-stand workstation installed on their workplace desk for 8 weeks. Participants in the control arm received no intervention. The primary outcome was workplace sitting time, assessed at 0, 4 and 8 weeks by an ecological momentary assessment diary. Secondary behavioural, cardiometabolic and musculoskeletal outcomes were assessed. Acceptability and feasibility were assessed via questionnaire and interview. ANCOVA and magnitude-based inferences examined intervention effects relative to controls at 4 and 8 weeks. Participants and researchers were not blind to group allocation. Results: Forty-seven participants were randomised (intervention n = 26; control n = 21). Relative to the control group at 8 weeks, the intervention group had a beneficial decrease in sitting time (-80.2 min/8-h workday (95 % CI = -129.0, -31.4); p = 0.002), increase in standing time (72.9 min/8-h workday (21.2, 124.6); p = 0.007) and decrease in total cholesterol (-0.40 mmol/L (-0.79, -0.003); p = 0.049). No harmful changes in musculoskeletal discomfort/pain were observed relative to controls, and beneficial changes in flow-mediated dilation and diastolic blood pressure were observed. Most participants self-reported that the workstation was easy to use and their work-related productivity did not decrease when using the device. Factors that negatively influenced workstation use were workstation design, the social environment, work tasks and habits. Conclusion: Short-term use of a feasible sit-stand workstation reduced daily sitting time and led to beneficial improvements in cardiometabolic risk parameters in asymptomatic office workers. These findings imply that if the observed use of the sit-stand workstations continued over a longer duration, sit-stand workstations may have important ramifications for the prevention and reduction of cardiometabolic risk in a large proportion of the working population. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02496507

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of biologic and targeted synthetic therapies in sarcoidosis

Objectives: Infliximab, an anti-TNF agent, is used to treat sarcoidosis that does not respond to corticosteroids or second-line agents. The efficacy of other anti-TNF agents, non-TNF biologics and targeted synthetic therapies remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate the role of these therapies in the management of multisystem sarcoidosis. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search to identify trials of biological and targeted synthetic therapies in sarcoidosis. Meta-analyses examined %-predicted forced vital capacity (FVC), as mean change from baseline. Heterogeneity was measured using the I2 statistic. Vote counting based on the direction of effect, as recommended by the Cochrane network, was used to synthesise study estimates. Results: The search identified 6777 records. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. These included 8 randomised control trials (RCTs) and 8 single-arm trials. Fourteen studies evaluated biologic therapies: infliximab (n=5), adalimumab (n=2), etanercept (n=2), golimumab (n=1), rituximab (n=1), anakinra (n=1), sarilumab (n=1), ustekinumab (n=1) and efzofitimod (n=1). Two trials assessed the targeted synthetic therapy tofacitinib. Risk of bias was high in five of eight RCTs. Meta-analysis of %-predicted FVC showed modest improvement with treatment (mean change: 4.79% (95% CI 1.22 to 8.35), driven by anti-TNF trials 5.70% (95% CI 1.61 to 9.78). Heterogeneity was substantial (I2=76.3%). In data synthesis using vote counting, infliximab, adalimumab, efzofitimod and tofacitinib demonstrated a positive direction of effect across all estimates, though improvements in several outcomes did not reach thresholds for minimal clinically important differences. Conclusions: Meta-analysis supports infliximab use in pulmonary sarcoidosis, although improvements in lung function are modest. There is limited but promising evidence for the use of adalimumab and tofacitinib in cutaneous disease and efzofitimob in pulmonary disease. Study interpretation is limited by small sample sizes and heterogeneity in study design and population.</p

Risk of infection in patients with early inflammatory arthritis:results from a large UK prospective observational cohort study

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk of serious infections-(SI) according to initial conventional synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs-(csDMARD) and corticosteroids, in patients recruited to the National Early Inflammatory Arthritis Audit.METHODS: An observational cohort study was used, including adults in England and Wales with new diagnoses of rheumatoid arthritis-(RA) between 2018-2023. Main outcome was SI-events, defined as infections requiring hospitalisation/or resulting in death. Secondary analyses evaluated SI-related mortality alone. Hazard ratios-(HR) were calculated using cox proportional hazards models. Primary predictor was initial treatment strategy, with confounder adjustments.RESULTS: 17 472 patients were included, of whom 10 997 on methotrexate-based strategies; 4,540 on other csDMARDs; 13 680 received corticosteroids. There were 1307 SI-events, corresponding to incidence rates per 100 person-years of 3.02 (95% CI: 2.86-3.19) and 311 SI-related mortality (IR 0.69, 95% CI: 0.61-0.77). Methotrexate-based strategies were associated with reduced risk of SI-events compared with other csDMARDs (adjusted HR 0.72, 95% CI: 0.63-0.82). In unadjusted models, corticosteroid was associated with higher risk of SI-events, but in adjusted models this association was no longer significant (adjusted HR 0.99, 95% CI: 0.87-1.12). Increasing age, being a current/or ex-smoker (relative to non-smoker), having a comorbidity, being seropositive, and having high DAS28 all associated with increased incidence of SI. One unit increase in baseline DAS28 increases the risk of SI-event by 10%.CONCLUSION: Methotrexate-based regimens associated with a reduced risk of SI compared with other strategies. Patient-level and disease-related factors at diagnosis are important predictors of SI in individuals with new RA.</p

Peri-operative red blood cell transfusion in neonates and infants: NEonate and Children audiT of Anaesthesia pRactice IN Europe: A prospective European multicentre observational study

BACKGROUND: Little is known about current clinical practice concerning peri-operative red blood cell transfusion in neonates and small infants. Guidelines suggest transfusions based on haemoglobin thresholds ranging from 8.5 to 12 g dl-1, distinguishing between children from birth to day 7 (week 1), from day 8 to day 14 (week 2) or from day 15 (≥week 3) onwards. OBJECTIVE: To observe peri-operative red blood cell transfusion practice according to guidelines in relation to patient outcome. DESIGN: A multicentre observational study. SETTING: The NEonate-Children sTudy of Anaesthesia pRactice IN Europe (NECTARINE) trial recruited patients up to 60 weeks' postmenstrual age undergoing anaesthesia for surgical or diagnostic procedures from 165 centres in 31 European countries between March 2016 and January 2017. PATIENTS: The data included 5609 patients undergoing 6542 procedures. Inclusion criteria was a peri-operative red blood cell transfusion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was the haemoglobin level triggering a transfusion for neonates in week 1, week 2 and week 3. Secondary endpoints were transfusion volumes, 'delta haemoglobin' (preprocedure - transfusion-triggering) and 30-day and 90-day morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: Peri-operative red blood cell transfusions were recorded during 447 procedures (6.9%). The median haemoglobin levels triggering a transfusion were 9.6 [IQR 8.7 to 10.9] g dl-1 for neonates in week 1, 9.6 [7.7 to 10.4] g dl-1 in week 2 and 8.0 [7.3 to 9.0] g dl-1 in week 3. The median transfusion volume was 17.1 [11.1 to 26.4] ml kg-1 with a median delta haemoglobin of 1.8 [0.0 to 3.6] g dl-1. Thirty-day morbidity was 47.8% with an overall mortality of 11.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate lower transfusion-triggering haemoglobin thresholds in clinical practice than suggested by current guidelines. The high morbidity and mortality of this NECTARINE sub-cohort calls for investigative action and evidence-based guidelines addressing peri-operative red blood cell transfusions strategies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT02350348

Incidence, prevalence, and mortality of sarcoidosis in England:a population-based study

BACKGROUND: The epidemiology of sarcoidosis in England is largely uncharted, with no population-level prevalence data and outdated incidence and mortality estimates. Our objective was to investigate contemporary trends in incidence, prevalence, and mortality.METHODS: This cohort study used primary care data from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), linked to secondary-care and national death registration. Patients aged ≥18 with sarcoidosis were identified using primary care codes. Age-and-sex standardised incidence and prevalence were calculated. Standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) compared mortality with the general population. A matched non-sarcoidosis cohort was constructed within CPRD, and Poisson regression compared all-cause mortality between incident cases and controls.FINDINGS: Between 2003 and 2023, 18,554 incident sarcoidosis patients were identified. The age- and sex-standardised incidence per 100,000 person-years increased from 6.65 in 2003 to 7.73 in 2023, with the most pronounced rise occurring between 2010 and 2016. Incidence rose notably among males and those over 60-year-olds. Sarcoidosis prevalence increased from 167 to 230 per 100,000 individuals. The age-and-sex standardised all-cause mortality rate was 12.2 per 1000 patients in 2023. Elevated mortality was observed in males [SMR: 1.8 (1.7-1.8)] and females [SMR: 2.1(2.0-2.2)], particularly in those aged 30-70 years old. Regression models indicated higher all-cause mortality in the incident sarcoidosis cohort compared to controls [adjusted mortality rate ratio 1.36 (95% CI 1.27-1.44)].INTERPRETATION: Sarcoidosis incidence has increased during the study period, with shifts in age-and-sex distribution and excess mortality risk. Recognising this burden is key to refining healthcare policies, optimising resources and improving patient outcomes.FUNDING: None.</p

Designing challenges in a virtual reality café to help people with eating disorders: A qualitative study of user needs

The aim of this qualitative user needs study is to gain insights from relevant stakeholders (people with lived experience of a current or previous eating disorder (PWLE), parents/carers of people with a current or previous eating disorder, and clinicians with experience of treating people with an eating disorder), to inform the design of a VR graded-exposure café scenario to help people with eating disorders who find going into or eating/drinking within a café environment challenging

Designing challenges in a virtual reality café to help people with eating disorders: A qualitative study of user needs

The aim of this qualitative user needs study is to gain insights from relevant stakeholders (people with lived experience of a current or previous eating disorder (PWLE), parents/carers of people with a current or previous eating disorder, and clinicians with experience of treating people with an eating disorder), to inform the design of a VR graded-exposure café scenario to help people with eating disorders who find going into or eating/drinking within a café environment challenging