1,421 research outputs found
Genus two 3-manifolds are built from handle number one pieces
Let M be a closed, irreducible, genus two 3-manifold, and F a maximal
collection of pairwise disjoint, closed, orientable, incompressible surfaces
embedded in M. Then each component manifold M_i of M-F has handle number at
most one, i.e. admits a Heegaard splitting obtained by attaching a single
1-handle to one or two components of boundary M_i. This result also holds for a
decomposition of M along a maximal collection of incompressible tori.Comment: Published by Algebraic and Geometric Topology at
http://www.maths.warwick.ac.uk/agt/AGTVol1/agt-1-38.abs.htm
Generalized Property R and the Schoenflies Conjecture
There is a relation between the generalized Property R Conjecture and the
Schoenflies Conjecture that suggests a new line of attack on the latter. The
approach gives a quick proof of the genus 2 Schoenflies Conjecture and suffices
to prove the genus 3 case, even in the absence of new progress on the
generalized Property R Conjecture.Comment: 29 pages, 8 figure
Refilling meridians in a genus 2 handlebody complement
Suppose a genus two handlebody is removed from a 3-manifold M and then a
single meridian of the handlebody is restored. The result is a knot or link
complement in M and it is natural to ask whether geometric properties of the
link complement say something about the meridian that was restored. Here we
consider what the relation must be between two not necessarily disjoint
meridians so that restoring each of them gives a trivial knot or a split link.Comment: This is the version published by Geometry & Topology Monographs on 29
April 200
Alternate Heegaard genus bounds distance
Suppose M is a compact orientable irreducible 3-manifold with Heegaard
splitting surfaces P and Q. Then either Q is isotopic to a possibly stabilized
copy of P or the Hempel distance of the splitting P is no greater than twice
the genus of Q.
More generally, if P and Q are bicompressible but weakly incompressible
connected closed separating surfaces in M then either a) P and Q can be
well-separated or b) P and Q are isotopic or c) the Hempel distance of P is no
greater than twice the genus of Q.Comment: This is the version published by Geometry & Topology on 4 May 2006
(V4: typesetting correction
- …
