Institutional imaginaries of publics in stem cell banking: The cases of the UK and Spain

The UK and Spanish Stem Cell Banks hold politically controversial-but potentially therapeutically beneficial-human embryonic stem cells for distribution to research laboratories globally. The UK bank was the first of its type in the world, opening in 2004, and the Spanish bank used it as a role model in its own development. Both banks structure their operations in response to how their staffs imagine the publics in their nation make trust judgements about their work. Differences between the workings of each bank can be traced to differences in the collective imaginings operating at each bank-termed 'institutional imaginaries'-about how publics think. The UK bank sustains an imaginary in which distance lends legitimacy and disengagement signifies correct moral practice. It conjures a public that values a steady, safe and reliable institution-free from potential conflict of interest-about which the less news the better. This stands in contrast to the Spanish bank that conjures a public that retains an interest in legitimate, ethical guardianship of stem cell material, but which is less worried about conflict of interest in attaining this. Instead, for the Spanish institution, engagement with science and the media through the projection of the bank as cutting edge is deemed crucial for maintaining public support. © 2013 Copyright Process Press.The support of the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) is gratefully acknowledged. This work was undertaken as part of the research programme of the ESRC Genomics Network at the Centre for Economic and Social Aspects of Genomics (Cesagen), Cardiff School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University, UK

STEM CELL RESEARCH: REPORT FROM THE SELECT COMMITTEE: EVIDENCE

Oral evidence -- Written evidence / Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority -- Oral evidence, 23 April 2001 / Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority -- Written evidence / Department of Health -- Oral evidence, 8 May 2001 / Department of Health -- Supplementary written evidence / Department of Health - - Further supplementary evidence / Department of Health -- Written evidence from the Royal Society / Royal Society and Academy of Medical Sciences -- Written evidence from the Academy of Medical Sciences / Royal Society and Academy of Medical Sciences -- Oral evidence, 2 July 2001 / Royal Society and Academy of Medical Sciences -- Written evidence from the Medical Research Council / Medical Research Council and Nuffield Council on Bioethics -- Written evidence from the Nuffield Council on Bioethics / Medical Research Council and Nuffield Council on Bioethics -- Oral evidence, 2 July 2001 / Medical Research Council and Nuffield Council on Bioethics -- Written evidence from The Board for Social Responsibility of the Church of England / Lord Bishop of Rochester, The Board for Social Responsibility of the Church of England; The Linacre Centre for Healthcare Ethics; and the Office of the Chief Rabbi -- Written evidence from the Court of the Chief Rabbi / Lord Bishop of Rochester, The Board for Social Responsibility of the Church of England; The Linacre Centre for Healthcare Ethics; and the Office of the Chief Rabbi -- Written evidence from the Linacre Centre for Healthcare Ethics / Lord Bishop of Rochester, The Board for Social Responsibility of the Church of England; The Linacre Centre for Healthcare Ethics; and the Office of the Chief Rabbi - - Oral evidence, 9 July 2001 / Lord Bishop of Rochester, The Board for Social Responsibility of the Church of England; The Linacre Centre for Healthcare Ethics; and the Office of the Chief Rabbi - - Written evidence from CARE / The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children and Christian Action Research and Education (CARE) -- Written evidence from the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children / The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children and Christian Action Research and Education (CARE) -- Written evidence from the Handicap Division of the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children / The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children and Christian Action Research and Education (CARE) -- Written evidence from Alison Davis / The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children and Christian Action Research and Education (CARE) -- Oral evidence, 16 July 2001 / The Society for the Protection of Unborn Children and Christian Action Research and Education (CARE) -- Written evidence from the BioIndustry Association / BioIndustry Association (BIA) and the Roslin Institute -- Written evidence from the Roslin Institute / BioIndustry Association (BIA) and the Roslin Institute -- Oral evidence, 23 July 2001 / BioIndustry Association (BIA) and the Roslin Institute -- Written evidence from The Association of Medical Research Charities (AMRC) / The Association of Medical Research Charities (AMRC); the Genetic Interest Group; and the Parkinson's Disease Society -- Written evidence from the Genetic Interest Group / The Association of Medical Research Charities (AMRC); the Genetic Interest Group; and the Parkinson's Disease Society -- Written evidence from the Parkinson's Disease Society of the UK / The Association of Medical Research Charities (AMRC); the Genetic Interest Group; and the Parkinson's Disease Society -- Oral evidence, 23 July 2001 / The Association of Medical Research Charities (AMRC); the Genetic Interest Group; and the Parkinson's Disease Society -- Written evidence from The Lord Walton of Detchant / Lord Walton of Detchant and the Wellcome Trust -- Written evidence from the Wellcome Trust / Lord Walton of Detchant and the Wellcome Trust -- Oral evidence, 15 October 2001 / Lord Walton of Detchant and the Wellcome Trust -- Written evidence from Sir Richard Sykes / Sir Richard Sykes -- Oral evidence, 22 October 2001 / Sir Richard Sykes -- Written evidence from Dr Michael Antoniou / Lord Alton of Liverpool, Dr Michael Antoniou; Professor David A Prentice; Professor Neil Scolding; Mr Gareth Williams -- Written evidence from Professor Neil Scolding / Lord Alton of Liverpool, Dr Michael Antoniou; Professor David A Prentice; Professor Neil Scolding; Mr Gareth Williams -- Supplementary evidence from Professor Neil Scolding / Lord Alton of Liverpool, Dr Michael Antoniou; Professor David A Prentice; Professor Neil Scolding; Mr Gareth Williams -- Oral evidence, 19 November 2001 / Lord Alton of Liverpool, Dr Michael Antoniou; Professor David A Prentice; Professor Neil Scolding; Mr Gareth Williams -- Written evidence / Islamic Medical Association -- Oral evidence, 19 November 2001 / Islamic Medical Association -- Written evidence -- Organisations -- All-Party Parliamentary Pro-Life Group -- Assisted Conception Unit, Birmingham Women's Health Care -- Association of Lawyers for the Defence of the Unborn -- Baha'i Community of the United Kingdom -- Baptists for Life Inc -- Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) - - British Heart Foundation -- British Medical Association (BMA) - - Cambridge University Orthodox Society -- Catholic Union of Great Britain and Guild of Catholic Doctors -- Centre for Bioethics and Public Policy -- Comment on Reproductive Ethics (CORE) -- Corner House -- Council of Heads of Medical Schools & Deans of UK Faculties of Medicine -- Diabetes UK -- Fisher Society -- (Members of the) German Parliament's Committee of Inquiry on Law and Ethics of Modern Medicine -- Human Genetics Alert -- IMAGE -- Institute of Science in Society -- King's College London -- LIFE -- Medical Ethics Alliance -- Medicines Control Agency -- Movement against the Cloning of Humans (MATCH) -- Policy, Ethics and Life Sciences Research Institute (PEALS), Universities of Durham and Newcastle - - Primary Immunodeficiency Association (PiA) -- ProLife Alliance - - Royal Society of Edinburgh -- Scientists for Labour -- Special Parkinson's Research Interest Group (SPRING) -- StudentLifeNet - - United Free Church of Scotland -- University Faculty for Life (UFL) -- Individuals -- Dr Ilham Saleh Abuljadayel -- Dr Elizabeth Allan -- Lord Alton of Liverpool -- Rupert Beale and Michael Pacold -- The Rev Ian Benson -- Dr Caroline Berry -- Professor Helen M Blau -- The Rt Rev Christopher Budd -- Mrs Elizabeth A Burbage - - Professor Derek Burke -- Eileen Cole -- Mrs J E Coverdale -- Norman Dallen -- Ian Duncan -- Francis Etheredge -- Dr Jonas Frisen -- Lord Habgood -- Professor John Harris -- Colin Harte -- David Heale -- The Rt Rev Christopher Herbert -- Christopher W J Hill - - A D Hunter -- Dr Gavin E Jarvis -- Professor Peter Jeffery -- Kathleen Liddell -- Dr Faith Lockwood -- Dr Kirsten McCoull and 17 others -- The Rev J MacDonald Smith -- Dr Maureen McHugh -- Professor Sheila A M McLean -- Professor Peter H Millard -- Sue Moore -- G E New -- Mrs M E Newman and D Hoggart -- Richard Ora - - John Perkins -- Jean Plant -- Professor Hilary Rose -- Professor Nadia Rosenthal -- Peter Saunders -- Dr Austin Smith -- Lord Tombs -- Professor Angelo Vescovi -- Dr Paul Watt -- His Eminence Cardinal Thomas Winning and His Eminence Cardinal Cormac Murphy- O'Connor -- Professor John Wyatt -- Mr A L & Mrs D E Young -- Miss Naomi Young -- Philip Young -- Stem cell research on-line consultation: report by the Hansard Societ