Os contornos e o entorno da Nova Sociologia da Moral

Neste ensaio vou expor brevemente como vejo o desenvolvimento do campo da Sociologia da Moral, com foco em seu potencial fundamentalmente interdisciplinar, destacando os estudos e tradições que merecem ser incorporados à sociologia. A moral, como tema de investigação da ciência social, perpassa os campos da psicologia (social e do desenvolvimento), sociologia, antropologia, neurociências e economia. Aqueles entre nós implicados no seu desenvolvimento afirmam que ela serve de fundamento para toda a organização e interação social. Assumo, implicitamente, a posição do filósofo Charles Taylor e do sociólogo Christian Smith de que os seres humanos vivem envolvidos em teias de significados, pelas quais são moldados, conforme versões de “certo” e de “bem”. Os seres humanos são fundamentalmente morais, não no sentido de serem convencionalmente altruístas ou de se preocuparem com os outros, mas de que as pessoas humanas, por serem seres sociais habitando um espaço social, devem assumir posições sobre temas relevantes nessas sociedades e grupos. As pessoas, de um modo geral, nesse meu paradigma, ancoram seus sentidos de si em posicionamentos morais, padrões que oferecem um solo a partir do qual dão sentido ao mundo através de lentes morais. Uma sociologia da moral compreende a formação dessas crenças, sua relativa imutabilidade ou as circunstâncias pelas quais elas mudam, sua influência sobre a ação e sua reconstrução retrospectiva diante de efeitos desajustados ou de pressões sociais.

Using Internet-Derived Data to Measure Religion: Understanding How Google Can Provide Insight into Cross-National Religious Differences

Internet and social media data provide new sources of information for examining social issues, but their potential for scholars interested in religion remains unclear. Focusing on cross-national religion data, we test the validity of measures drawn from Google and Twitter against well-known existing data. We find that Google Trend (GT) searches for the dominant religions’ major holidays, along with “Buddhism,” can be validated against traditional sources. We also find that GT and traditional measures account for similar amounts of variation, and the GT measures do not differ substantially from established ones for explaining several cross-national outcomes (e.g., fertility, circumcision, and alcohol use), as well as new ones (e.g., interest in religious buildings and sex). The Twitter measures do not perform as well. Our study provides insight into best practices for generating and using these measures, and offers evidence that internet-generated data can replicate existing measures that are less accessible and more expensive

A Novel Measure of Moral Boundaries: Testing Perceived In-Group/Out-Group Value Differences in a Midwestern Sample

The literature on group differences and social identities has long assumed that value judgments about groups constitute a basic form of social categorization. However, little research has empirically investigated how values unite or divide social groups. The authors seek to address this gap by developing a novel measure of group values: third-order beliefs about in- and out-group members, building on Schwartz value theory. The authors demonstrate that their new measure is a promising empirical tool for quantifying previously abstract social boundaries. Results from a midwestern sample show an important dichotomy such that in-groups were attributed the more positive and altruistic transcendence and openness values, while out-groups were associated conservation and enhancement, the value domains revolving around a self-focus and social restraint. Furthermore, religious attendance and political ideology also emerged as strong predictors of value boundaries, whereas socioeconomic indicators were less influential. Significance and implications are discussed.</div

The Evolution of Moral Progress Meets Social Science: Suggestions to Augment an Ambitious Argument

Abstract Buchanan and Powell’s ambitious work offers a wide-ranging philosophical treatment about one of social science’s active inquries: human morality and how it evolved. This review humbly offers a brief engagement with the social science of morality, both to support the book’s conclusions and occasionally to build productive interdisciplinary bridges toward an even more fuller treatment of the topic.</jats:p