5 research outputs found
Evidence-Based Practices for Children, Youth, and Young Adults with Autism: Third Generation Review
This article is a systematic review describing a set of practices that have evidence of positive effects with autistic children and youth. It is the third iteration of a review of the intervention literature (Odom et al. in J Autism Dev Disorders 40(4):425–436, 2010a; Prevent School Fail 54(4):275–282, 2010b; Wong et al. in https://autismpdc.fpg.unc.edu/sites/autismpdc.fpg.unc.edu/files/imce/documents/2014-EBP-Report.pdf; J Autism Dev Disorders 45(7):1951–1966, 2015), extending coverage to articles published between 1990 and 2017
Recommended from our members
Correction to: Evidence-Based Practices for Children, Youth, and Young Adults with Autism: Third Generation
Correction to the article "Evidence-Based Practices for Children, Youth, and Young Adults with Autism: Third Generation Review." The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1007/
s10803-020-04844-2.Autism Spectrum Disorde
National Clearinghouse on Autism Evidence and Practice (NCAEP): Finding the Relevance to OT Within a Large-Scale Systematic Review
Abstract
Date Presented 03/27/20
The National Professional Development Center on ASD completed a review of literature published between 1990 and 2011 and identified 27 evidence-based practices for individuals with autism spectrum disorder from birth through age 21. The NCAEP is now conducting an updated review of the literature. Findings from the updated review that are relevant to OT domain and practice will be shared and discussed.
Primary Author and Speaker: Susan Szendrey</jats:p
Doing Occupational Justice: A Central Dimension of Everyday Occupational Therapy Practice
Background. The Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists (CAOT) and the American Occupational Therapy Association (AOTA) state that occupational justice is part of the domain of occupational therapy and that occupational justice is “an aspect of contexts and environments and an outcome of intervention” (AOTA, 2014, p. S9). Key Issues. Despite the increasing focus on justice in the occupational therapy and the occupational science literature, many practitioners in traditional settings do not see its relevance to their everyday practice (Galvin, Wilding, & Whiteford, 2011) or have difficulty envisioning how to enact a justice-informed practice. Purpose. This paper demonstrates how occupational justice is germane to all settings of occupational therapy, and how it can be enacted at micro, meso, and macro levels of occupational therapy practice. Implications. We argue that occupational therapy is a justice-oriented profession at its core and will discuss how occupational justice can be enacted at all levels of practice. </jats:sec
