5,999 research outputs found
Integrating form and meaning in L2 pronunciation instruction
One of the central challenges of ESL teaching is striking the right balance
between form and meaning. In pronunciation pedagogy, this challenge is compounded
because repetitive practice, which has been shown to enhance phonological
acquisition and promote fluency, is widely viewed as being incompatible with
communicative principles. This article provides a brief historical background for
modern pronunciation pedagogy (from World War II to the present) as part of a
backdrop for understanding the current disjuncture between pronunciation and
communicative language teaching. A discussion on form-focused instruction, its
applicability for pronunciation pedagogy, and challenges in implementation follows
with reference to a recent article that presents evidence for the appropriateness
of a communicative instructional framework for teaching L2
pronunciation (Trofimovich & Gatbonton, 2006). Finally, a communicative activity
that encourages repetitive practice while integrating pronunciation with
other components of language use is proposed
Deconstructing comprehensibility: identifying the linguistic influences on listeners' L2 comprehensibility ratings
Comprehensibility, a major concept in second language (L2) pronunciation research that denotes listeners’ perceptions of how easily they understand L2 speech, is central to interlocutors’ communicative success in real-world contexts. Although comprehensibility has been modeled in several L2 oral proficiency scales—for example, the Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL) or the International English Language Testing System (IELTS)—shortcomings of existing scales (e.g., vague descriptors) reflect limited empirical evidence as to which linguistic aspects influence listeners’ judgments of L2 comprehensibility at different ability levels. To address this gap, a mixed-methods approach was used in the present study to gain a deeper understanding of the linguistic aspects underlying listeners’ L2 comprehensibility ratings. First, speech samples of 40 native French learners of English were analyzed using 19 quantitative speech measures, including segmental, suprasegmental, fluency, lexical, grammatical, and discourse-level variables. These measures were then correlated with 60 native English listeners’ scalar judgments of the speakers’ comprehensibility. Next, three English as a second language (ESL) teachers provided introspective reports on the linguistic aspects of speech that they attended to when judging L2 comprehensibility. Following data triangulation, five speech measures were identified that clearly distinguished between L2 learners at different comprehensibility levels. Lexical richness and fluency measures differentiated between low-level learners; grammatical and discourse-level measures differentiated between high-level learners; and word stress errors discriminated between learners of all levels
Review of "Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research"
Experimental evaluation of atmospheric effects on radiometric measurements using the EREP of Skylab
The author has identified the following significant results. Test sites were located near the Great Salt Lake and the Salton Sea. Calculations were performed for a set of atmospheric models corresponding to the test sites, in addition to standard models for summer and winter midlatitude atmospheres with respective integrated water vapor amount of 2.4 g/sq cm and 0.9 g/sq cm. Each atmosphere was found to contain an average amount of continental aerosol. Computations were valid for high solar elevation angles. Atmospheric attenuation quantities were computed in addition to simulated EREP S192 radiances
Key themes, constructs, and interdisciplinary perspectives in second language pronunciation assessment
- …
