Primer Note: A novel set of EST-SSR markers in Tamarix: a resource to characterize this genus

AbstractBoth the negative and positive ecological impact of Tamarix plants is controversial, and thus a more comprehensive understanding is necessary. Tamarisks are invasive in many countries but the inter-specific transferability that characterizes simple sequence repeats (SSRs) could be harnessed to track the spread of specific genotypes or to study invasive populations. Thirteen polymorphic SSR markers, derived from expressed sequence tag (EST), were identified by first screening 26 samples of T. aphylla, T. jordanis, T. nilotica, and T. tetragyna and then 33 unidentified tamarisks from Yotvata, Israel. The mean number of alleles per locus ranged from two to 14 and the mean expected heterozygosity was 0.415. These EST-SSR markers will undoubtedly be useful in the genetic characterization of the genus Tamarix due to their high cross-species transferability which enables the estimation of the genetic diversity among and within different species, that are adapted to the same desert habitat under severe environmental constraints

Weekly epirubicin plus lonidamine in advanced breast carcinoma

: Lonidamine has been demonstrated to potentiate the cytotoxic activity of several antineoplastic drugs, for example anthracyclines. Moreover, epirubicin is considered one of the most active drugs in advanced breast cancer, although optimal dose and schedule remains to be defined. In the present study we have treated 51 patients with advanced breast cancer with a combination of lonidamine (450 mg/day orally from day 1 throughout treatment) and epirubicin (25 mg/m2 i.v.) administered according to a weekly schedule for 24 weeks. Objective responses were observed in 29 out of 51 patients (57%; CR 16%, PR 41%). Liver metastases responded in eight out of 12 evaluable patients (67%). Average response duration was 12.4 months and median overall survival was 23 months (range 1-90+). Toxicity was negligible. The combination of weekly epirubicin and lonidamine is feasible and active in advanced breast cancer patients

Circadian optimisation of irinotecan and oxaliplatin efficacy in mice with Glasgow osteosarcoma

The relevance of circadian rhythms in irinotecan and oxaliplatin tolerability was investigated with regard to antitumour activity. Mice bearing Glasgow osteosarcoma (GOS) received single agent irinotecan (50 or 60 mg kg−1 per day) or oxaliplatin (4 or 5.25 mg kg−1 per day) at one of six dosing times expressed in hours after light onset (3, 7, 11, 15, 19 or 23 hours after light onset). Irinotecan (50 mg kg−1 per day) and oxaliplatin (4 or 5.25 mg kg−1 per day) were given 1 min apart at 7 or 15 hours after light onset, or at their respective times of best tolerability (7 hours after light onset for irinotecan and 15 hours after light onset for oxaliplatin) or worst tolerability (15 hours after light onset for irinotecan and 7 hours after light onset for oxaliplatin). Tumour growth rate was nearly halved and per cent increase in estimated life span (% ILS) was – doubled in the mice receiving irinotecan at 7 hours after light onset as compared to 15 hours after light onset (P<0.05). Results of similar magnitude were obtained with oxaliplatin for both endpoints, yet with 7 hours after light onset corresponding to least efficacy and 15 hours after light onset to best efficacy (P<0.05). Irinotecan addition to oxaliplatin proved therapeutic benefit only if the schedule consisted of irinotecan administration at 7 hours after light onset and oxaliplatin delivery at 15 hours after light onset, i.e. when both drugs were given near their respective ‘best’ circadian times. These would correspond to the middle of the night for irinotecan and the middle of the day for oxaliplatin in humans

Toxicity and activity of docetaxel in anthracycline-pretreated breast cancer patients: a phase II study

: Docetaxel has proven effective in advanced breast cancer. Myelosuppression and cumulative fluid retention syndrome are troublesome, potentially avoidable toxicities. In this consecutive cohort study, docetaxel (100 mg/m2 by 1 hour i.v. infusion, q3 weeks) activity and toxicity was explored in 56 anthracycline-pretreated patients (eligible: 55: median age: 51 years [range: 28-68 years]; median performance status: 0 [range: 0-3]) with metastatic breast cancer, using two different granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and steroid pre- and postmedication schedules. Twenty-nine patients (group A) received a 5-day oral prednisone premedication, and 26 (group B) received 4-day low-dose i.m. dexamethasone; group B patients also received prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and 53 for response. Prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor significantly lowered the incidence of grade III-IV neutropenia and neutropenic fever (p = 0.0001 and 0.01, respectively). The incidence of moderate-severe fluid retention syndrome was lower in patients receiving i.m. dexamethasone (p = 0.08). Overall response rate was 53% (4 complete responses/24 partial responses, 95% confidence interval 39.4-66.2%); 32% have stable disease and 15% progressive disease. In 21 anthracycline-refractory/resistant patients, as well as in 10 paclitaxel-pretreated patients, the overall response rate was 50%. Docetaxel is highly active in anthracycline- and paclitaxel-pretreated metastatic breast cancer, with manageable toxicity. Optimal use of both granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support and steroid premedication deserves further investigation

Breast cancer and timing of surgery during menstrual cycle: a 5-year analysis of 248 premenopausal women

: In the present report, we retrospectively analyzed the impact of the timing of surgery during menstrual cycle on disease-free and overall survival of 248 premenopausal patients with stage I/II breast cancer who underwent surgery followed by anthracycline-containing adjuvant chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 5 years, no statistically significant differences were observed in disease-free or overall survival between women operated upon during the follicular (days 0-14) and the luteal (days 15-32) phase of the menstrual cycle. The impact on disease-free and overall survival of lymph-node status, tumor size and hormone receptor expression, but not of the phase of the menstrual cycle at the time of surgery, was confirmed by univariate and multivariate analysis. However, when combined with hormone receptor status, the phase of the menstrual cycle at the time of surgery proved useful to better define the prognosis of primary breast cancer patients, with significantly longer disease-free and overall survival for patients operated upon during the follicular phase and with positive hormone receptors

Weekly schedule of vinorelbine in pretreated breast cancer patients

Purpose: In this phase II study, we explored tolerability and activity of vinorelbine administered according to a dose-dense weekly schedule with hematopoietic growth factor support in pretreated, advanced breast cancer patients. Patients and methods: From January 1994 to March 1996, 40 patients with metastatic breast cancer, pretreated with at least one prior anthracycline-containing regimen, were entered into the study. Patient characteristics: median age 53 years (range 32-70); ECOG performance status 0-1: 34 patients, 2: 6 patients; dominant visceral metastatic disease: 15 patients, dominant non-visceral: 25; anthracycline-refractory/resistant: 2 patients, sensitive: 38 patients. Six patients were treated as first-line therapy for metastatic disease and 34 in second- or subsequent lines. All patients received vinorelbine at the dose of 25 mg/m2/week as a short intravenous infusion, together with routine antiemetic medication. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (Lenograstim) at the dose of 150 microg/m2 subcutaneously on day 3 was included in the treatment schedule. Results: The median number of treatment weeks was 23 (range: 4-24), with a delivered dose-intensity (DDI) of 23.8 mg/m2/week (range: 18.7-25, 95.2% of projected dose-intensity). Toxicity was mild, with non-complicated neutropenia being the main toxicity observed (grade 3-4 in 25% of the patients but only 2% of treatment weeks). Overall response rate was 52.5%, with complete responses in 12.5% of patients. Median duration of the response and median time to progression were 10 and 9 months, respectively. Median overall survival was 19 months. Conclusion: Dose-dense weekly vinorelbine is safe and effective with minimal toxicity in pretreated advanced breast cancer patients

Second- and third-generation aromatase inhibitors as first-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal metastatic breast cancer patients: a pooled analysis of the randomised trials

The purpose of this study was to estimate in all randomised trials the relative risk of overall response rate (ORR), clinical benefit (CB), time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and toxicity of aromatase inhibitors (AI), compared with tamoxifen (Tam) as first-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal metastatic breast cancer (PMBC) women. Prospective randomised studies were searched through computerised queries of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) abstract database. Relative risk, 95% confidence interval, and heterogeneity were derived according to the inverse variance and Mantel–Haenszel method and Q statistics. Six phase III prospective randomised trials including 2787 women were gathered. A significant advantage in ORR (P=0.042), TTP (P=0.007), and CB (P=0.001) in favour of AI over Tam was detected at the fixed effects model. These results were not significant at the random effects model, owing to the significant heterogeneity. On the contrary, no difference was registered for OS (P=0.743) with no significant heterogeneity. Regarding toxicity, Tam caused more frequently thromboembolic events (P=0.005) and vaginal bleeding (P=0.001) compared with AI. Aromatase inhibitors appear to be superior to Tam as first-line endocrine option in PMBC women. Owing to a component of variability between the six studies analysed, the random effects estimates differed from corresponding fixed ones. Investigators should assess heterogeneity of trial results before deriving summary estimates of treatment effect

A randomized phase II study of combination, alternating and sequential regimens of doxorubicin and docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy for women with metastatic breast cancer

Background: This randomized phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of doxorubicin and docetaxel (DOC) administered either as a combination, an alternating or a sequential regimen in women with metastatic breast cancer. Secondary objectives included overall response, time to progression, survival and safety. Patients and methods: Patients with breast cancer (n = 123) were randomized to receive doxorubicin and DOC either in combination (60 mg/m(2) of each drug), or by alternated or sequential schedule (100 mg/m(2) DOC and 75 mg/m(2) doxorubicin) every 3 weeks for a maximum of eight cycles as first chemotherapy for stage IV disease. A second randomization allocated patients from each arm to receive prophylactic oral ciprofloxacin or no therapy to prevent febrile neutropenia. Results: Patients received a median of eight cycles. In an intention-to-treat analysis, the overall response was 63%, 52% and 61% in the combination, alternating and sequential schedules, respectively. Corresponding rates of complete response were 15%, 14% and 11%. Grade 4 neutropenia was common in all arms (81%) and, together with febrile neutropenia, was significantly more frequent with the combination. Prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin did not reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia or infection. Other frequent non-hematological adverse events included alopecia, nausea, vomiting, stomatitis and asthenia. Congestive heart failure only occurred in the combination arm (10%). Conclusion: All three schedules are feasible and endowed of good therapeutic activity. In view of the more pronounced toxicity and the risk of cardiac events because of the higher exposure to doxorubicin, the combination should be least favored when treating women with metastatic breast cancer. Prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin was ineffective and is not recommended