13 research outputs found
Quantitative flow ratio-based outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation quaestio study
Background: Coronary artery disease (CAD) is common in patients with aortic valve stenosis (AS) ranging from 60% to 80%. The clinical and prognostic role of coronary artery lesions in patients undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) remains unclear. The aim of the present observational study was to estimate long-term clinical outcomes by Quantitative Flow Ratio (QFR) characterization of CAD in a well-represented cohort of patients affected by severe AS treated by TAVI. Methods: A total of 439 invasive coronary angiographies of patients deemed eligible for TAVI by local Heart Teams with symptomatic severe AS were retrospectively screened for QFR analysis. The primary endpoint of the study was all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular mortality, stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA), acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and any hospitalization after TAVI. Results: After exclusion of patients with no follow-up data, coronary angiography not feasible for QFR analysis and previous surgical myocardial revascularization (CABG) 48/239 (20.1%) patients had a QFR value lower or equal to 0.80 (QFR + value), while the remaining 191/239 (79.9%) did not present any vessel with a QFR positive value. In the adjusted Cox regression analysis, patients with positive QFR were independently associated with an increased risk of all-casual mortality (Model 1, HR 3.47, 95% CI, 2.35−5.12; Model 2, HR 5.01, 95% CI, 3.17−7.90). In the adjusted covariate analysis, QFR+ involving LAD (37/48, 77,1%) was associated with the higher risk of the composite outcome compared to patients without any positive value of QFR or non-LAD QFR positive value (11/48, 22.9%). Conclusions: Pre-TAVI QFR analysis can be used for a safe, simple, wireless functional assessment of CAD. QFR permits to identify patients at high risk of cardiovascular mortality or MACE, and it could be considered by local Heart Teams
C69 EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF DISTINCT ANTIPLATELET REGIMENS AFTER TRANSCATHETER LEFT ATRIALE APPENDAGE OCCLUSION: A SINGLE CENTER REAL–WORLD EXPERIENCE
Abstract
Transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as a reliable tool to prevent thromboembolic events, in particular ischemic stroke, in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in the absence of mitral stenosis/valve prosthesis and contraindication to oral anticoagulation (OAC). Antiplatelet therapy (APT) is required after device implantation to prevent device–related thrombus (DRT). Previous studies provided conflicting results on the optimal APT regimen after LAAO. Thus, herein we aimed at assessing the comparative effectiveness and safety of distinct APT regimens. We conducted a real–world single–center observational study including consecutive AF patients that underwent LAAO at the University Hospital of Parma between October 2010 and June 2021. Clinical follow–up included all successfully implanted patients. Primary endpoint was net efficacy outcome, a composite of any ischemic or hemorrhagic event. Secondary endpoints were ischemic (any of the following: ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack [TIA], DRT, systemic embolism) and hemorrhagic (major [≥3] bleedings according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC] classification) complications alone. We enrolled a total of 130 patients (median age 77.0 [72.7;81.0] years; 78 [60.0%] men). History of hemorrhagic stroke in OAC (74 [56.9%]) was the main indication for LAAO. Technical procedure success was achieved in 123 (94.6%) patients. According to multidisciplinary team evaluation, immediately after LAAO, 39 (31.7%) patients received short (≤ 1 month)–dual APT (DAPT) consisting of cardioaspirin and clopidogrel, 35 (28.5%) long (>1, ≤12 months)–DAPT and 49 (39.8%) single APT (SAPT). At a median follow–up of 32 months, the incidence of primary endpoint was significantly lower in short–DAPT group (3 [7.7%] vs. 7 [20.0%] in long–DAPT vs. 14 [28.6%] in SAPT, p = 0.049], mainly driven by a lower occurrence of bleeding endpoint (0 [0.0] vs. 4 [11.4%] in long–DAPT vs. 9 [18.4%] in SAPT, p = 0.020) without differences in the incidence of ischemic endpoint (p = 0.916). Finally, comparison of the Kaplan–Meier curves showed that short–DAPT group had a higher primary endpoint–free survival (p = 0.015) compared to the others. In summary, our study highlighted that short (≤ 1 month)–DAPT regimen after LAAO is associated with better outcomes, mainly driven by reduction of major bleedings. Strong evidences arising from randomized trials are warranted to support these findings.
<jats:p /
Conduction disturbances after TAVR: rates of pacemaker implantation, burden of ventricular pacing and prognostic significance
Abstract
Funding Acknowledgements
Type of funding sources: None.
BACKGROUND
The occurrence of conduction disturbances remains frequent after TAVR. However, the effect of PM on mortality is controversial and many patients may recover spontaneous AV conduction during follow-up.
PURPOSE
To evaluate the incidence of PM implantation after TAVR, PM dependency and burden of ventricular pacing during follow-up and their influence on mortality.
METHODS AND RESULTS
We performed a retrospective analysis of all consecutive 293 patients who underwent TAVR from 2015 to 2019 at our hospital, regional hub for this procedure. Patients were classified into 3 groups: patients without PM (no-PM), patients with a PM implanted prior to TAVR (pre-PM) and patients requiring a PM following TAVR (post-PM) and their clinical and procedural characteristics are listed in Table 1.
The rate of PM implantation after TAVR was 20,8%, at a median of 3.6 days after the procedure. The most common indication was complete AV block. A VVIR pacemaker was implanted in 28 patients, a DDD/DDDR PM in 27 patients and 2 patients received a CRT device. Among post-PPM patients, only 16% were PM-dependent at 2-month and 1-year follow-up. All of them received a PM for complete AV block (AVB). At 1-year follow-up, RV pacing burden was 60% among AVB patients and 23% in patients with a PM implanted for other reasons. PM implantation after TAVR was not associated with a mortality difference at 30-day, 1-year and long-term follow-up. Pre-PPM patients showed a higher mortality rate at long-term follow-up although not statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS
Our data suggest that a single chamber device should be preferred in patients implanted for reasons other than complete AVB; in patients with AVB, the use of dual chamber device with an algorithm to minimize RV pacing should be the most suitable choice. Overall (293)No PPM (216)Pre-PPM (19)Post-PPM (57)p-valueAge, median(IQR)82(80-86)82(80-86)82(79-87)82(80-86)0,53Female, n(%)160(55)129(59)6(32)25(44)0,40NYHA III-IV, n(%)191(65)147(68)15(79)29(51)0,06Logistic Euroscore, mean (IQR)7,53(3,5-8,3)7(3,5-8)9,83(3,6-12)6(3,5-7,4)0,51Right bundle-branch block, n(%)21(7)13(6)na8(14)0,04AVA, mean ± SD0,69 ± 0,190,7 ± 0,190,7 ± 0,160,66 ± 0,180,23Self-expandable valve, n(%)181(62)123(57)12(63)46(81)0,001Balloon-expandable valve, n(%)102(35)86(40)7(37)8(14)0,0003Implant depth, mean ± SD6,87 ± 2,96,32 ± 2,65,71 ± 39,12 ± 30,0001Abstract Figure. Kaplan-Meier survival curve
</jats:sec
Predictors of recurrent cerebral ischemia after patent foramen ovale closure: A single center observational study
Objectives: Transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure lowers recurrent stroke in patients with cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attack with an indication for closure. However, the incidence of recurrent stroke is not negligible and underlying pathophysiology remains largely unknown. We sought to evaluate the prevalence of recurrent ischemic neurological events and to assess its predictors after transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure. Methods: We enrolled consecutive patients who underwent patent foramen ovale closure for secondary prevention of neurological ischemic events at the University Hospital of Parma between 2006 and 2021. Clinical and procedure-related features were collected for each patient. The incidence of recurrent ischemic neurological events was assessed at follow-up. Results: We enrolled a total of 169 patients with mean Risk of Paradoxical Embolism score at hospital admission of 6.4 ± 1.5. The primary indication was previous cryptogenic stroke (94 [55.6 %] subjects), followed by transient ischemic attack (75 [44.4 %]). Among patients with complete outcome data (n= 154), after a median follow-up of 112 months, recurrent cerebral ischemia occurred in 13 [8.4 %], with an annualized rate of 0.92/100 patients. The presence of obesity [OR 5.268, p = 0.018], Risk of Paradoxical Embolism score < 7 [OR 5.991, p = 0.035] and migraine [OR = 5.932 p = 0.012] were independent positive predictors of recurrent stroke/ transient ischemic attack after patent foramen ovale closure. Conclusions: The presence of obesity, Risk of Paradoxical Embolism score < 7 and migraine were independent positive predictors of recurrent ischemic neurological events after patent foramen ovale closure
Looking for optimal antithrombotic strategy after transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion: a real-world comparison of different antiplatelet regimens
Background: Transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as an effective procedure for the prevention of thromboembolic events in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with contraindications to oral anticoagulation. After the procedure, different antithrombotic regimens have been used, in order to prevent device-related thrombus and trying to minimize bleedings. The search for the optimal antithrombotic strategy is still ongoing. We sought to assess efficacy and safety of different antiplatelet therapy (APT) regimens. Methods: We enrolled non-randomized consecutive patients who underwent LAAO at the University Hospital of Parma between 2010 and 2021. Three study groups were identified according to post-procedural APT: long (>1, ≤12 months)-dual APT (DAPT), short (≤ 1 month)-DAPT, lifelong single APT (SAPT). The choice of the APT was left to multidisciplinary team evaluation. The incidence of the primary outcome, a composite of any ischemic or hemorrhagic event, was assessed at follow-up. Results: We enrolled a total of 130 patients. Technical success was achieved in 123 (94.6%) patients. After LAAO, 39 [31.7%] patients were discharged on short-DAPT, 35 [28.5%] on long-DAPT and 49 [39.8%] on SAPT. After a median follow-up of 32 months, short-DAPT group had a significantly lower occurrence of the primary outcome (3 [7.7%] vs. 7 [20.0%] in long-DAPT vs. 14 [28.6%] in SAPT, p = 0.049], mainly driven by a lower occurrence of the bleeding endpoint (0 vs. 4 [11.4%] in long-DAPT vs. 9 [18.4%] in SAPT, p = 0.020). Finally, comparison of the Kaplan-Meier curves showed that short-DAPT group had a higher primary endpoint-free survival [p = 0.015] compared to the other groups. Conclusion: Post-procedural short-DAPT strategy was associated with better outcomes, mainly driven by reduction of major bleedings
Managing cardiac arrest secondary to spontaneous coronary artery dissection: should we routinely consider ICD implantation? Insights from the Parma SCAD registry
Summary. Background. Cardiac arrest secondary to a spon taneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) represents a chal lenging scenario. Methods. We collected clinical data from
four women admitted in the Coronary Care Unit (CCU) of the
Parma University Hospital over the last two years for cardiac
arrest with the angiographic diagnosis of SCAD. Results.
Three patients survived the acute phases. One patient, being
considered at high risk of SCAD recurrence, received a sub cutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD).
Conclusions. The acute management of cardiac arrest related
to SCAD deserves specific consideration. The residual myo cardial damage and the predisposing and precipitants fac tors should be evaluated, in order to estimate the SCAD
recurrence and sudden cardiac death risk
C12 MANAGING CARDIAC ARREST SECONDARY TO SPONTANEOUS CORONARY ARTERY DISSECTION: SHOULD WE ROUTINELY CONSIDER ICD IMPLANTATION? INSIGHTS FROM PARMA SCAD REGISTRY
Abstract
Background
Cardiac arrest secondary to a spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) represents a challenging scenario. It deserves specific considerations due to the dramatic presentation and the need for secondary sudden cardiac death prevention.
Methods
We collected clinical data of four women admitted during the last two years in the Coronary Care Unit of Parma University Hospital, whose presentation of SCAD were cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation (Table1).
Results
Three patients survived the acute phases. One patient, being considered at high risk of SCAD recurrence, received a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter–defibrillator (S–ICD). Acute management of cardiac arrest related to SCAD deserves specific considerations. Our case series illustrates the importance of prompt resuscitation manoeuvres and early defibrillation. We propose a flow chart of management of cardiac arrest in patient with suspect of SCAD (Figure 2 A). Evaluating risk of SCAD recurrence and sudden cardiac death. The management of SCAD patients complicated by malignant ventricular arrhythmias and cardiac arrest is challenging. Looking at published registries, it appears that SCAD patients are more likely to suffer from ventricular arrythmia or sudden cardiac death than non–SCAD MI patients. The risk–benefit ratio of ICD implantation in these patients remain uncertain . Evaluation of scar burden with CMR can help stratify the global arrhythmic risk, especially as extensive myocardial scar with a residual impaired LVEF increases the risk of future arrhythmic events (Figure 2 B). In our series, only one patient underwent S–ICD implantation, and the decision was mainly driven by the finding of underlying arteriopathy affecting other vascular territories, suggesting a potentially higher rate of SCAD recurrence. For this particular subset of patients, we propose an algorithm that combines predisposing factors and myocardial injury quantification data (Figure 2 B) that could be useful for the estimate of the risk of malignant arrythmias, as well as the risk of recurrence of SCAD, but needs to be validated in larger case studies.
Conclusions
The acute management of cardiac arrest related to SCAD deserves specific consideration. The residual myocardial damage, predisposing and precipitants factors should be evaluated in order to estimate the SCAD recurrence and sudden cardiac death risks.
</jats:sec
P56 SPONTANEOUS CORONARY ARTERY DISSECTIONS: ANALYSIS OF NON TRADITIONAL RISK FACTORS
Abstract
The etiology of spontaneous coronary dissection (SCAD) is not well defined and Non traditional risk factors (NT–RF) have assumed increasing interest, but few data are available. NT–RF include three categories: Sex–related (SR–NT–FR), Sex–predominant (SP–NT–RF) and Gender–related (GR–NT–RF). (Table 1)
Aim of the Study
The objective of our analysis was to evaluate the incidence of NT–RF in Parma SCAD registry population.
Material and methods
We reviewed 62 patients with SCAD enrolled between January 2013 through November 2021
Results
Traditional risk factors were less common: hypertension was the most prevalent (39 pts, 62.9%). When considering NT–RF, 51 patients (82%) had at least one of all, with at least one SR–RF (66%) or GR–RF (64,5%). Patients with NT–RF were younger at time of SCAD (mean age 53 vs 66; p = 0.027) and they were predominantly females (48 vs 7 pts, p = 0.004) (Table 2). No differences were found among NT–RF SCAD and nNT–RF SCAD patients by fibromuscular dysplasia, peripheral arterial disease and chronic kidney disease. Patients with SCAD more often presented with non ST–segment elevation myocardial infarction (43 pts, 72.6%) vs ST–segment elevation (17 pts, 27.4%). No differences in clinical presentation and angiographic characteristics were found among NT–RF and nNT–RF patients group. MACE occurred in 17.7% of patients of the overall study population, at a median follow–up of 23 (interquartile range: 11;57) months. When comparing the incidence of cardiovascular events in the 2 study groups there was a trend toward a higher prevalence of MACE in NT–RF group without statistical significance (NT–RF SCAD 19.6% – nNT–RF SCAD 9.1%; p = 0.4). (Table 3)
Conclusion
SCAD is an emerging cause of myocardial infarction in young and middle–aged women without the traditional cardiovascular risk profile. Although overall survival seems good, SCAD is a potentially malignant disease which can present with ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Risk estimation is difficult in women, due to the scarce validity of prediction models, therefore a great effort must be made by the clinical community for the widespread diffusion and use of models incorporating NT–RF. Acknowledgement of peculiar features of this disease could help clinicians and researchers to establish targeted interventions for cardiovascular primary prevention, early diagnosis and secondary prevention in women, including rehabilitation and stress management programmes.
</jats:sec
An unusual case of early myocardial infarction: paradoxical coronary embolism in patient with patent foramen ovale
Case Report: A 40 years old male patient was admitted
to our CCU after acute onset of chest pain. The diagnostic
EKG showed a sinus rhythm with a transient ST-segmentelevation in the inferior leads. Markers of cardiac injury
were elevated (Troponin-I 9.6 ng/mL at peak).
Patient underwent emergency coronary angiogram with
evidence of complete, embolic occlusion of left anterior
descending artery at the level of the apical recurrent branch.
Given the small dimension of this very distal vessel, no
percutaneous intervention was performed.
Echocardiography showed a mild left ventricular systolic
dysfunction (EF 45%) with inferior wall and apical akinesia.
The patient was completely free from cardiovascular risk
factors. He had a history of migraine and a minor stroke
30 years before with a brain CT-scan showing multiple
ischemic areas.
In order to investigate the possible etiology of the
thrombotic event, we searched for a ovale foramen
patency and thrombophilia. A contrast echocardiography
confirmed the clinical suspicion of patent foramen ovale
(PFO) with massive right to left shunt, while screening for
thrombophilia was negative.
Initially the patient was pharmacologically treated with a triple
antithrombotic therapy (aspirin, clopidogrel and enoxaparin),
then he underwent percutaneous closure of PFO with
Amplatzer® septal occluder 27mm. Procedure was uneventful
and the patient completely recovered. Dual antiplatelet
theraphy was prolonged for 1 year after the index event.
At 12 months of follow-up the patient was completely
asymptomatic with contrast echocardiography showing no
evidence of residual interatrial shunt.
Discussion: Paradoxical coronary artery embolism is a rare
but under-diagnosed cause of acute myocardial infarction
and requires a high level of clinical suspicion to make
an early diagnosis. PFO is a common congenital cardiac
anomaly that has been shown to be an independent risk
factor for cerebrovascular events, particularly among young
adults with cryptogenic stroke. Embolic events occurring
through the PFO can also affect other vascular districts,
including coronary and peripheral arteries.
Here we report a case of an acute myocardial infarction in a
young man with a PFO. In our opinion this case highlights
the importance of searching for the presence of a PFO in
young patients with thrombotic coronary events
Prognostic role of coronary artery ectasia in patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease
AimsCoronary artery ectasia (CAE) has been linked to the occurrence of adverse events in patients with ischemia/angina and no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA/ANOCA), while the relationship between CAE and myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) has been poorly investigated. In our study we aimed at assessing differences in clinical, angiographic and prognostic features among patients with CAE and MINOCA vs. INOCA/ANOCA presentation.MethodsPatients with angiographic evidence of CAE were enrolled at the University Hospital of Parma and divided into MINOCA vs. INOCA/ANOCA presentation. Clinical and quantitative angiographic information was recorded and the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was assessed at follow-up.ResultsWe enrolled a total of 97 patients: 49 (50.5%) with MINOCA and 48 (49.5%) with INOCA/ANOCA presentation. The presentation with MINOCA was associated with a higher frequency of inflammatory diseases (P = 0.041), multivessel CAE (P = 0.030) and thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow < 3 (P = 0.013). At a median follow-up of 38 months, patients with MINOCA had a significantly higher incidence of MACE compared with those with INOCA/ANOCA [8 (16.3%) vs. 2 (4.2%), P = 0.045], mainly driven by a higher rate of nonfatal MI [5 (10.2%) vs. 0 (0.0%), P = 0.023]. At multivariate Cox regression analysis, the presentation with MINOCA (P = 0.039) and the presence of TIMI flow <3 (P = 0.037) were independent predictors of MACE at follow-up.ConclusionAmong a cohort of patients with CAE and nonobstructive coronary artery disease, the presentation with MINOCA predicted a worse outcome
