15 research outputs found
Results from the Final Exposure of the CDMS II Experiment
We report results from a blind analysis of the final data taken with the
Cryogenic Dark Matter Search experiment (CDMS II) at the Soudan Underground
Laboratory, Minnesota, USA. A total raw exposure of 612 kg-days was analyzed
for this work. We observed two events in the signal region; based on our
background estimate, the probability of observing two or more background events
is 23%. These data set an upper limit on the Weakly Interacting Massive
Particle (WIMP)-nucleon elastic-scattering spin-independent cross-section of
7.0x10^{-44} cm^2 for a WIMP of mass 70 GeV/c^2 at the 90% confidence level.
Combining this result with all previous CDMS II data gives an upper limit on
the WIMP-nucleon spin-independent cross-section of 3.8x10^{-44} cm^2 for a WIMP
of mass 70 GeV/c^2. We also exclude new parameter space in recently proposed
inelastic dark matter models.Comment: 6 pages, 5 figure
Primordial Black Holes as All Dark Matter
We argue that a primordial black hole is a natural and unique candidate for
all dark matter. We show that, in a smooth-hybrid new double inflation model, a
right amount of the primordial black holes, with a sharply-defined mass, can be
produced at the end of the smooth-hybrid regime, through preheating. We first
consider masses < 10^(-7)M_sun which are allowed by all the previous
constraints. We next discuss much heavier mass 10^5 M_sun hinted at by entropy,
and galactic size evolution, arguments. Effects on the running of the scalar
spectral index are computed.Comment: 14 pages, 2 figures, a version to appear in JCAP
The Indirect Search for Dark Matter with IceCube
We revisit the prospects for IceCube and similar kilometer-scale telescopes
to detect neutrinos produced by the annihilation of weakly interacting massive
dark matter particles (WIMPs) in the Sun. We emphasize that the astrophysics of
the problem is understood; models can be observed or, alternatively, ruled out.
In searching for a WIMP with spin-independent interactions with ordinary
matter, IceCube is only competitive with direct detection experiments if the
WIMP mass is sufficiently large. For spin-dependent interactions IceCube
already has improved the best limits on spin-dependent WIMP cross sections by
two orders of magnitude. This is largely due to the fact that models with
significant spin-dependent couplings to protons are the least constrained and,
at the same time, the most promising because of the efficient capture of WIMPs
in the Sun. We identify models where dark matter particles are beyond the reach
of any planned direct detection experiments while being within reach of
neutrino telescopes. In summary, we find that, even when contemplating recent
direct detection results, neutrino telescopes have the opportunity to play an
important as well as complementary role in the search for particle dark matter.Comment: 17 pages, 10 figures, published in the New Journal of Physics 11
105019 http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/1367-2630/11/10/105019, new version
submitted to correct Abstract in origina
Annihilation of NMSSM neutralinos in the Sun and neutrino telescope limits
We investigate neutralino dark matter in the framework of NMSSM performing a
scan over its parameter space and calculating neutralino capture and
annihilation rates in the Sun. We discuss the prospects of searches for
neutralino dark matter in neutrino experiments depending on neutralino content
and its main annihilation channel. We recalculate the upper limits on
neutralino-proton elastic cross sections directly from neutrino telescopes
upper bounds on annihilation rates in the Sun. This procedure has advantages as
compared with corresponding recalcalations from the limits on muon flux,
namely, it is independent on details of the experiment and the recalculation
coefficients are universal for any kind of WIMP dark matter models. We derive
90% c.l. upper limits on neutralino-proton cross sections from the results of
the Baksan Underground Scintillator Telescope.Comment: 28 pages, 16 figures, accepted for publication in JCAP, references
adde
Determining Supersymmetric Parameters With Dark Matter Experiments
In this article, we explore the ability of direct and indirect dark matter
experiments to not only detect neutralino dark matter, but to constrain and
measure the parameters of supersymmetry. In particular, we explore the
relationship between the phenomenological quantities relevant to dark matter
experiments, such as the neutralino annihilation and elastic scattering cross
sections, and the underlying characteristics of the supersymmetric model, such
as the values of mu (and the composition of the lightest neutralino), m_A and
tan beta. We explore a broad range of supersymmetric models and then focus on a
smaller set of benchmark models. We find that by combining astrophysical
observations with collider measurements, mu can often be constrained far more
tightly than it can be from LHC data alone. In models in the A-funnel region of
parameter space, we find that dark matter experiments can potentially determine
m_A to roughly +/-100 GeV, even when heavy neutral MSSM Higgs bosons (A, H_1)
cannot be observed at the LHC. The information provided by astrophysical
experiments is often highly complementary to the information most easily
ascertained at colliders.Comment: 46 pages, 76 figure
Non-Baryonic Dark Matter - Observational Evidence and Detection Methods
The evidence for the existence of dark matter in the universe is reviewed. A
general picture emerges, where both baryonic and non-baryonic dark matter is
needed to explain current observations. In particular, a wealth of
observational information points to the existence of a non-baryonic component,
contributing between around 20 and 40 percent of the critical mass density
needed to make the universe geometrically flat on large scales. In addition, an
even larger contribution from vacuum energy (or cosmological constant) is
indicated by recent observations. To the theoretically favoured particle
candidates for non-baryonic dark matter belong axions, supersymmetric
particles, and of less importance, massive neutrinos. The theoretical
foundation and experimental situation for each of these is reviewed. Direct and
indirect methods for detection of supersymmetric dark matter are described in
some detail. Present experiments are just reaching the required sensitivity to
discover or rule out some of these candidates, and major improvements are
planned over the coming years.Comment: Submitted to Reports on Progress in Physics, 59 pages, LaTeX, iopart
macro, 14 embedded postscript figure
Puzzles of Dark Matter - More Light on Dark Atoms?
Positive results of dark matter searches in experiments DAMA/NaI and
DAMA/LIBRA confronted with results of other groups can imply nontrivial
particle physics solutions for cosmological dark matter. Stable particles with
charge -2, bound with primordial helium in O-helium "atoms" (OHe), represent a
specific nuclear-interacting form of dark matter. Slowed down in the
terrestrial matter, OHe is elusive for direct methods of underground Dark
matter detection using its nuclear recoil. However, low energy binding of OHe
with sodium nuclei can lead to annual variations of energy release from OHe
radiative capture in the interval of energy 2-4 keV in DAMA/NaI and DAMA/LIBRA
experiments. At nuclear parameters, reproducing DAMA results, the energy
release predicted for detectors with chemical content other than NaI differ in
the most cases from the one in DAMA detector. Moreover there is no bound
systems of OHe with light and heavy nuclei, so that there is no radiative
capture of OHe in detectors with xenon or helium content. Due to dipole Coulomb
barrier, transitions to more energetic levels of Na+OHe system with much higher
energy release are suppressed in the correspondence with the results of DAMA
experiments. The proposed explanation inevitably leads to prediction of
abundance of anomalous Na, corresponding to the signal, observed by DAMA.Comment: Contribution to Proceedings of XIII Bled Workshop "What Comes beyond
the Standard Model?
