HUBUNGAN ANTARA KEMAMPUAN LOMPAT TEGAK DENGAN LOMPAT JAUH GAYA JONGKOK KELAS V SD NEGERI ADISCUCIPTO 1 KECAMATAN DEPOK, KABUPATEN SLEMAN YOGYAKARTA TAHUN PELAJARAN 2011/2012

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara kemampuan lompat tegak dengan hasil lompat jauh gaya jongkok pada siswa kelas V SD Negeri Adisucipto 1, Kecamatan Depok, Kabupaten Sleman Yogyakarta Tahun Pelajaran 2011/2012 Populasi yang digunakan adalah siswa kelas V di SD Negeri Adisucipto 1, Kecamatan Depok, Kabupaaten Sleman Yogyakarta yang berjumalah 71 siswa. Penelitian ini menggunakan teknik purposive sampling dengan bersyarat siswa yang ada pada waktu penelitian berjumlah 60 siswa sebagai sampel. kemudian diberi tes dan pengukuran pada masing-masing variabel. Teknik analisis data menggunakan analisis uji korelasional yang mengkorelasikan : kemampuan lompat tegak dengan lompat jauh gaya jongkok. Dari hasil uji korelasi dapat diketahui (r hitung) sebesar 0,007, sedangkan r tabel pada signifikansi 0,05 dan N=60 sebesar 0,254 (r tabel). Melihat hasil tersebut berarti r hitung 0,007 < r tabel = 0,254. Hal ini berarti tidak ada hubungan yang signifikan kemampuan lompat tegak dengan lompat jauh gaya jongkok siswa kelas V SD Negeri Adisucipto 1, Kecamatan Depok, Kabupaten Sleman Yogyakarta. Dengan demikian dapat disimpulkan bahwa : kemampuan lompat tegak tidak memiliki hubungan yang signifikan dengan hasil lompat jauh gaya jongkok pada siswa kelas V SD Negeri Adisucipto 1 Depok Sleman Yogyakarta. Dengan demikian hipotesis alternatif ditolak. Kata Kunci : kemampuan lompat tegak, lompat jauh gaya jongko

Mapping Perspectives on the EU as Mediator

Research on the European Union’s role as a meditator is nascent. It predominantly focuses on case studies or is cursorily embedded within wider research on the European Union (EU) as a crisis manager. Moreover, there is a significant disconnect between the established studies on mediation based in Conflict Analysis Studies and the EU’s foreign and security policy situated in Security Studies. Thus, there is a dearth of systematic engagement on the issue of EU mediation, although the EU often uses the language of mediation as a key component of its external commitments to conflict prevention, transformation and resolution. While advancements in mediation research suggest that there are certain determinants of mediation, and highlight key features that support and impede actors during conflict, this has not been systematically applied to the EU. Consequently, a key task of this workshop was to establish conceptual clarity and practical information about on the EU’s mediation roles. As a starting point, this workshop took stock of EU mediation knowledge from the perspective of different actors including academics, civil society and policy practitioners. In particular, it explored the limited academic engagement with this particular aspect of EU foreign and security policy. Additionally, the workshop critically interrogated how the EU understood its role in international mediation practice by exploring its capabilities and infrastructure and thereby locating opportunities and constraints to it performance. By bringing together various perspectives these discussions generated critical insights into where the remaining gaps in knowledge lay and the possibilities of academic partnerships with practitioners and policymakers to create new knowledge for Security and Conflict Analysis Studies

Using theory to escape the descriptive impasse

In this article, I focus on the importance of theory for undertaking and making sense of research. In particular, I consider one of the most common challenges for postgraduate students, which is how to shift from describing findings (what I found) to theorising about them (why my findings turned out this way). Using a case study approach, I describe my engagement with a particular set of data and demonstrate how different theories led me to focus on different elements and draw different conclusions. I conclude that explicitly shifting my theoretical approach ended up guiding me towards a much stronger interpretation of my descriptive findings

Claiming space in sport: Opening wide the doors to sporting success

With a new millennium comes time to reflect on where we have been and where we are going. There are many stories of New Zealand sportswomen’s success that should be celebrated, and there is little doubt that visibility, opportunities, public support and recognition have improved over time. In this first section of the book, we focus on research that highlights some of those achievements

“Finding the \u27Public\u27 in \u27Public Disrepute” – Would the Cultural Defense Make a Difference in Celebrity and Sports Endorsement Contract Disputes? - The Case of Michael Vick and Adrian Peterson

This article will explore this issue by engaging in case studies of the Vick and Peterson scandals to see what would have happened had the two men taken their claims against Nike to court. Part One will discuss the cases in more depth and elaborate on how they might be viewed through the lens of cultural relativity theory and the cultural defense. Part Two will elaborate on what morals clauses are and the legal standards courts use to enforce them. In addition to examining the Mendenhall decision, several other court cases will be discussed, each of which places differing levels of emphasis on how much evidence is needed to meet the public disrepute requirement. Except for the judge in the Mendenhall case, all of the judges in these additional cases were white. This is mentioned because it is possible that the race of the judge may bear some relation to the level of openness they may have to entertaining the cultural defense. Part Three will apply the aforementioned legal standards to the Vick and Peterson cases, with special attention paid to the extent to which courts discussed in Part Two might be open to entertaining the cultural defense in these kinds of disputes. Part Four will contain my conclusion, which is that most judges will probably not give extra weight to the cultural defense in situations of the type discussed here. There will be a range of approaches to how courts might define public disrepute in these cases, but the overall outcome will be the same. On one side will be a small number of judges, like the judge in Mendenhall, who require both sides to produce detailed evidence to show if expressed minority viewpoints favoring talent outweigh viewpoints that disfavor talent. However, since white football fans outnumber blacks, this will mean that black talent like those discussed here won\u27t benefit from the cultural defense. On the other side will be judges who base their decisions on their own personal take on what the majority of people do (or should) think about the matter. In the main case discussed here where such an approach took place, the judge ruled against talent. Thus, regardless of the rationale for the decision-making expressed in these cases, most talent in these kinds of situations will lose. Nevertheless, there may still be some judges and endorsement company managers who do want to take into account the social dimensions that give rise to the cultural defense in the interests of fairness. My conclusion at the end of the paper will suggest some possible approaches they can adopt to achieve this result