2,585 research outputs found
How “intuition” exploded
Recent decades have seen a surge in interest in metaphilosophy. In particular there has been an interest in philosophical methodology. Various questions have been asked about philosophical methods. Are our methods any good? Can we improve upon them? Prior to such evaluative and ameliorative concerns, however, is the matter of what methods philosophers actually use. Worryingly, our understanding of philosophical methodology is impoverished in various respects. This article considers one particular respect in which we seem to be missing an important part of the picture. While it is a received wisdom that the word “intuition” has exploded across analytic philosophy in recent decades, the article presents evidence that the explosion is apparent across a broad swathe of academia (and perhaps beyond). It notes various implications for current methodological debates about the role of intuitions in philosophy
The age of anxiety? It depends where you look: changes in STAI trait anxiety, 1970–2010
Purpose
Population-level surveys suggest that anxiety has been increasing in several nations, including the USA and UK. We sought to verify the apparent anxiety increases by looking for systematic changes in mean anxiety questionnaire scores from research publications.
Methods
We analyzed all available mean State–Trait Anxiety Inventory scores published between 1970 and 2010. We collected 1703 samples, representing more than 205,000 participants from 57 nations.
Results
Results showed a significant anxiety increase worldwide, but the pattern was less clear in many individual nations. Our analyses suggest that any increase in anxiety in the USA and Canada may be limited to students, anxiety has decreased in the UK, and has remained stable in Australia.
Conclusions
Although anxiety may have increased worldwide, it might not be increasing as dramatically as previously thought, except in specific populations, such as North American students. Our results seem to contradict survey results from the USA and UK in particular. We do not claim that our results are more reliable than those of large population surveys. However, we do suggest that mental health surveys and other governmental sources of disorder prevalence data may be partially biased by changing attitudes toward mental health: if respondents are more aware and less ashamed of their anxiety, they are more likely to report it to survey takers. Analyses such as ours provide a useful means of double-checking apparent trends in large population surveys
Measurement of psychological entitlement in 28 countries
This article presents the cross-cultural validation of the Entitlement Attitudes Questionnaire, a tool designed to measure three facets of psychological entitlement: active, passive, and revenge entitlement. Active entitlement was defined as the tendency to protect individual rights based on self-worthiness. Passive entitlement was defined as the belief in obligations to and expectations toward other people and institutions for the fulfillment of the individual’s needs. Revenge entitlement was defined as the tendency to protect one’s individual rights when violated by others and the tendency to reciprocate insults. The 15-item EAQ was validated in a series of three studies: the first one on a general Polish sample (N = 1,900), the second one on a sample of Polish students (N = 199), and the third one on student samples from 28 countries (N = 5,979). A three-factor solution was confirmed across all samples. Examination of measurement equivalence indicated partial metric invariance of EAQ for all national samples. Discriminant and convergent validity of the EAQ was also confirmed
What happens if you single out? An experiment
We present an experiment investigating the effects of singling out an individual on trust and trustworthiness. We find that (a) trustworthiness falls if there is a singled out subject; (b) non-singled out subjects discriminate against the singled out subject when they are not responsible of the distinct status of this person; (c) under a negative frame, the singled out subject returns significantly less; (d) under a positive frame, the singled out subject behaves bimodally, either selecting very low or very high return rates. Overall, singling out induces a negligible effect on trust but is potentially disruptive for trustworthiness
Sweets, sex, or self-esteem? Comparing the value of self-esteem boosts with other pleasant rewards
Many people ascribe great value to self-esteem, but how much value? Do people value self-esteem more than other pleasant activities, such as eating sweets and having sex? Two studies of college students (Study 1: N=130; Study 2: N=152) showed that people valued boosts to their self-esteem more than they valued eating a favorite food and engaging in a favorite sexual activity. Study 2 also showed that people valued self-esteem more than they valued drinking alcohol, receiving a paycheck, and seeing a best friend. Both studies found that people who highly valued self-esteem engaged in laboratory tasks to boost their self-esteem. Finally, personality variables interacted with these value ratings. Entitled people thought they were more deserving of all pleasant rewards, even though they did not like them all that much (both studies), and people who highly value self-esteem pursued potentially maladaptive self-image goals, presumably to elevate their self-esteem (Study 2). © 2011 The Authors. Journal of Personality © 2011, Wiley Periodicals, Inc
What makes a young assertive bystander? The effect of intergroup contact, empathy, cultural openness, and in-Group bias on assertive bystander intervention intentions.
The present research tests the indirect effects of intergroup contact on adolescents’ bystander intervention intentions via four potential mediators: “empathy,” “cultural openness,” “in-group bias,” and “intergroup anxiety.” British adolescents (N = 855), aged 11–13 years, completed measures of intergroup (interethnic) contact and the identified indirect variables. Intended bystander behavior was measured by presenting participants with an intergroup (immigrant) name-calling scenario. Participants rated the extent to which they would behave assertively. The findings extend previous intergroup contact research by showing a significant indirect effect of intergroup contact on assertive bystander intentions via empathy, cultural openness and in-group bias (but not via intergroup anxiety). Theoretical implications and practical suggestions for future prejudice-reduction interventions are discussed
Educación para la ciudadanía democrática en la cultura digital
Asumiendo la importancia de las nuevas tecnologías en las aulas, especialmente en las actuales sociedades de la
información y la comunicación, y siguiendo las recomendaciones de la Unión Europea a favor de la alfabetización
mediática, el presente trabajo reflexiona acerca de la necesidad de educar no solo en los usos técnicos y eficientes
de las tecnologías comunicativas, sino también en el uso responsable y cívico de las mismas, favoreciendo así los procesos
participativos y deliberativos que son el sustento de una democracia viva. El sueño griego de la «isegoría», del
igual derecho de todos al uso de la palabra, puede hacerse realidad en la cultura digital, si bien es cierto que un uso
hiperselectivo de la tecnología comunicativa puede producir un efecto contrario: las nuevas formas de socialización
pueden contribuir a la expansión de «cámaras de eco» o «nichos digitales», es decir, espacios discursivos cada vez
más reducidos en donde el derecho a decir se desvincula de la responsabilidad de escuchar críticamente lo que procede
de un espacio público más abierto y plural. Una de las metas de la educación en la cultura digital es precisamente
frenar esta tendencia, detectada en los últimos años por autores como Sunstein, Wolton o Cortina. En el presente
artículo se proponen orientaciones educativas para evitar estos sesgos y para fomentar, mediante la tecnología
comunicativa, la ciudadanía digital y los valores éticos propios de sociedades democráticas.Given the importance of new technologies in the classroom, especially in today’s information and communication
societies, and following European Union recommendations to promote media literacy, this article reflects the need
to educate not only in technical and efficient applications of communication technologies but also in their civic and
responsible use, thus promoting participatory and deliberative processes which are the lifeline of a functioning democracy.
The Greek dream of «isegoria», everyone’s right to speak, can become a reality in a digital culture, yet the
highly selective use of communication technology can have the opposite effect: new forms of socialization can contribute
to the expansion of «echo chambers» or «digital niches», shrinking communication spaces in which the right
to speak dissociates itself from the responsibility to listen critically to what arises from a more open, plural and public
sphere. One of the goals of education in a digital culture is precisely to diminish this trend that authors such as
Sunstein, Wolton and Cortina have detected in recent years. This article proposes educational guidelines to avoid
this bias by using communication technology to promote digital citizenship and the ethical values sustained by democratic
societies
Figures of admiration in emerging adulthood: A four country study
Admiration is a social emotion that is developmentally formative in emerging adulthood; admired adults act as mentors, role models and sources of inspiration to this age group (Arnett, 2014). The present study explored who and what emerging adults admire, across four countries (UK, Iran, China and Russia). 525 participants provided written descriptions of an admired figure. Across all cultures, Care and Generativity was the most common theme. Cross-cultural differences emerged for Limitations and Difficulties (most prevalent in China), Autonomy and Assertiveness (most prevalent in Russia), Intellect and Education (most prevalent in Russia), and Religion and Spirituality (most prevalent in Iran). Males and females in the UK and Russia tended to select admired figures of their own sex, but in Iran and China both male and female participants selected more male figures. The findings suggest a common core to admiration in emerging adulthood, combined with culturally specific features
Time crawls when you’re not having fun: Feeling entitled makes dull tasks drag on
All people have to complete dull tasks, but individuals who feel entitled may be more inclined to perceive them as a waste of their "precious" time, resulting in the perception that time drags.This hypothesis was confirmed in three studies.In Study 1, participants with higher trait entitlement (controlling for related variables) thought dull tasks took longer to complete; no link was found for fun tasks.In Study 2, participants exposed to entitled messages thought taking a dull survey was a greater waste of time and took longer to complete.In Study 3, participants subliminally exposed to entitled words thought dull tasks were less interesting, thought they took longer to complete, and walked away faster when leaving the laboratory.Like most resources, time is a resource valued more by entitled individuals.A time-entitlement link provides novel insight into mechanisms underlying self-focus and prosocial dynamics. © 2011 by the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc
The influence of teacher feedback on children's perceptions of student–teacher relationships
Background
Teachers can deliver feedback using person (‘you are clever’) or process terms (‘you worked hard’). Person feedback can lead to negative academic outcomes, but there is little experimental research examining the impact of feedback on children's perceptions of the student–teacher relationship.
Aim
We examined the effects of person, process, and no feedback on children's perceptions of their relationship with a (fictional) teacher following success and failure.
Samples
Participants were British children (145 aged 9–11 in experiment 1 and 98 aged 7–11 in experiment 2).
Method
In experiment 1, participants read three scenarios where they succeeded and received one of two types of praise (person or process) or no praise. Participants then read two scenarios where they failed. In experiment 2, participants read that they had failed in three tasks and received one of two types of criticism (person or process) or no criticism. Participants then read two scenarios where they succeeded. They rated how much they liked the teacher and how much they felt that the teacher liked them.
Results
Children felt more positive about the student–teacher relationship following success than failure. Type of praise did not influence perceptions of the student–teacher relationship following success or failure. However, person criticism led children to view the student–teacher relationship more negatively following failure and maintain this negative view following the first success.
Conclusions
Success appears to be important for developing positive student–teacher relationships. In response to failure, teachers could avoid person criticism which may negatively influence the student–teacher relationship
- …
