Temporomandibular joint damage in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: Diagnostic validity of diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders

Diagnostic criteria reported in the expanded taxonomy for temporomandibular disorders include a standardised clinical examination and diagnosis (DC/TMD 3.B) of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) damage in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA); however, their validity is unknown

Temporomandibular Involvement and Craniofacial Development in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) is a generalised autoimmune disease, which starts in childhood. JIA is one of the most frequent occurring autoimmune diseases in childhood, and concerns approximately 1 in a 1000 children. JIA is a heterogeneous group of conditions divided into seven different subtypes (see table 1). These different subtypes all should meet some mutual criteria. These criteria are; start of the disease before the sixteenth birthday, arthritis persisting for at least 6 weeks, and all other diagnosis should be excluded. The subtypes are divided based on the clinical symptoms during the first six months of the disease according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. These subtypes all have a different initial presentation, course, and prognosis

Agreement between child- and parent-reported orofacial symptoms in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Objective: To assess the agreement between child- and parent-reported orofacial symptoms in the Danish version of the patient questionnaire Assessment of Orofacial Symptoms in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. Method: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Aarhus University in March 2023. Eligible candidates were consecutive subjects with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and temporomandibular joint involvement accompanied by a parental proxy for examination in the Craniofacial Clinic. After obtaining written informed consent, the questionnaire was completed individually and separately by the child and the parent without any communication between them. The level of agreement was analysed using Cohen’s (weighted) kappa for nominal and ordinal outcome variables (orofacial pain frequency, pain location, jaw function, orofacial symptoms, and changes since last visit) and the intraclass correlation coefficient for linear outcome variables (orofacial pain intensity and functional disability of the jaw). Results: The 34 included dyads had an overall ‘poor’ to ‘moderate’ child–proxy reporting agreement on the questionnaire for the assessment of JIA-related orofacial symptoms. After dividing the children into two age groups, < 13 and ≥ 13 years old, we found substantial agreement on pain frequency and moderate to excellent agreement on pain intensity for the older group. The child–proxy agreement for children aged < 13 years was slight on pain frequency and poor to moderate on pain intensity. Conclusion: The child–proxy reporting agreement on JIA-related orofacial symptoms is inconsistent. We suggest collecting information from both children and parents, especially when assessing orofacial pain and symptoms in children < 13 years of age

Genomic Health Literacy Interventions in Pediatrics:Scoping Review

BACKGROUND: The emergence of genetic and genomic sequencing approaches for pediatric patients has raised questions about the genomic health literacy levels, attitudes toward receiving genomic information, and use of this information to inform treatment decisions by pediatric patients and their parents. However, the methods to educate pediatric patients and their parents about genomic concepts through digital health interventions have not been well-established. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this scoping review is to investigate the current levels of genomic health literacy and the attitudes toward receiving genomic information among pediatric patients and their parents. The secondary aim is to investigate patient education interventions that aim to measure and increase genomic health literacy among pediatric patients and their parents. The findings from this review will be used to inform future digital health interventions for patient education. METHODS: A scoping review using PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines and protocols was completed using the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Scopus. Our search strategy included genomic information inclusive of all genetic and genomic terms, pediatrics, and patient education. Inclusion criteria included the following: the study included genetic, genomic, or a combination of genetic and genomic information; the study population was pediatric (children and adolescents <18 years) and parents of patients with pediatric illnesses or only parents of patients with pediatric illnesses; the study included an assessment of the knowledge, attitudes, and intervention regarding genomic information; the study was conducted in the last 12 years between 2008 and 2020; and the study was in the English language. Descriptive data regarding study design, methodology, disease population, and key findings were extracted. All the findings were collated, categorized, and reported thematically. RESULTS: Of the 4618 studies, 14 studies (n=6, 43% qualitative, n=6, 43% mixed methods, and n=2, 14% quantitative) were included. Key findings were based on the following 6 themes: knowledge of genomic concepts, use of the internet and social media for genomic information, use of genomic information for decision-making, hopes and attitudes toward receiving genomic information, experiences with genetic counseling, and interventions to improve genomic knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: This review identified that older age is related to the capacity of understanding genomic concepts, increased genomic health literacy levels, and the perceived ability to participate in decision-making related to genomic information. In addition, internet-searching plays a major role in obtaining genomic information and filling gaps in communication with health care providers. However, little is known about the capacity of pediatric patients and their parents to understand genomic information and make informed decisions based on the genomic information obtained. More research is required to inform digital health interventions and to leverage the leading best practices to educate these genomic concepts